Effects of the group leadership promotion approach on students’ higher order thinking awareness and online interactive behavioral patterns in a blended learning environment

ABSTRACT The present study aims to incorporate a group leadership promotion approach into collaborative learning tasks in the hope of developing students’ creativity, problem-solving, and critical thinking. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, we recruited 59 cross-professional students from a university in northern Taiwan, and divided them into an experimental group (6 sub-groups) and a control group (6 sub-groups). The experimental group students learned with the group leadership promotion approach, while the control group learned with conventional blended learning approach. The results show that the students could better develop their creativity, problem-solving, critical thinking, and learning achievement via the group leadership promotion approach. Lastly, sequential analysis of their behaviors indicated that students’ interaction with group leadership in online collaborative learning can promote many more creative ideas and comments, enhance reaching a consensus and making conclusions, and finally, facilitate completion of the group learning tasks.

[1]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  Nahida Mahmud Imanova,et al.  New Media Communication , 2018 .

[3]  Basuki Wibawa,et al.  Determining the Appropriate Blend of Blended Learning: A Formative Research in the Context of Spada-Indonesia , 2018 .

[4]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  A Case Study of How a Reduction in Explicit Leadership Changed an Online Game Community , 2017, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[5]  Liang-Yi Li,et al.  Accessing online learning material: Quantitative behavior patterns and their effects on motivation and learning performance , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Pei Liu,et al.  Blended learning with Moodle in medical statistics: an assessment of knowledge, attitudes and practices relating to e-learning , 2017, BMC Medical Education.

[7]  Hui-Ming Kuo,et al.  A Study on the Effect of Virtual Reality 3D Exploratory Education on Students’ Creativity and Leadership , 2017 .

[8]  S. Eagleton Designing blended learning interventions for the 21st century student. , 2017, Advances in physiology education.

[9]  Ya-Wen Lin,et al.  The Effect of Blended Learning in Mathematics Course. , 2017 .

[10]  Ana González-Marcos,et al.  Student evaluation of a virtual experience for project management learning: An empirical study for learning improvement , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Abelardo Pardo,et al.  Quality in blended learning environments - Significant differences in how students approach learning collaborations , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Do interpersonal skills and interpersonal perceptions predict student learning in CSCL-environments? , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Interactivity in online discussions and learning outcomes , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Edward Palmer,et al.  Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[15]  F. Butera,et al.  Improving Low Achievers’ Academic Performance at University by Changing the Social Value of Mastery Goals , 2015 .

[16]  G. Shieh,et al.  Optimal sample size allocation for Welch’s test in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA , 2015, Behavior research methods.

[17]  Chien Chou,et al.  Can more interactivity improve learning achievement in an online course? Effects of college students' perception and actual use of a course-management system on their learning achievement , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Meredith J.C. Swallow,et al.  The Year-Two Decline: Exploring the Incremental Experiences of a 1:1 Technology Initiative , 2015 .

[19]  Jeffrey R. Harring,et al.  Reexamining the Impact of Nonnormality in Two-Group Comparison Procedures , 2015 .

[20]  Steven E. Higgins,et al.  Different leaders: Emergent organizational and intellectual leadership in children’s collaborative learning groups , 2014, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[21]  Kelsey L. Deane,et al.  The Youth Adventure Programming Model , 2014 .

[22]  B. Chaminade,et al.  Les blessures lors de la pratique de l’escalade en France de 2004 à 2011 , 2014 .

[23]  W. Herzog,et al.  Social skills as predictors of communication, performance and quality of collaboration in project-based learning , 2014, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[24]  Chien Yu,et al.  Impacts of role assignment and participation in asynchronous discussions in college-level online classes , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[25]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Effects of mobile learning time on students' conception of collaboration, communication, complex problem-solving, meta-cognitive awareness and creativity , 2014, Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organisation.

[26]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[27]  Ya-Ting Carolyn Yang,et al.  A blended learning environment for individualized English listening and speaking integrating critical thinking , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Kui Xie,et al.  What do the numbers say? The influence of motivation and peer feedback on students' behaviour in online discussions , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[29]  Claire Jarvis,et al.  Going mobile: perspectives on aligning learning and teaching in geography , 2013 .

[30]  A. Colli Contextualizing Performances of Family Firms , 2012 .

[31]  Huei-Tse Hou,et al.  Exploring the behavioral patterns of learners in an educational massively multiple online role-playing game (MMORPG) , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Effectiveness of shared leadership in online communities , 2012, CSCW.

[33]  Larry Johnson,et al.  The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. , 2012 .

[34]  A. Tsui,et al.  Leadership behaviors and group creativity in Chinese organizations: The role of group processes ☆ ☆☆ , 2011 .

[35]  Ru-Chu Shih,et al.  Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning , 2011 .

[36]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Can Traditional Divergent Thinking Tests Be Trusted in Measuring and Predicting Real-World Creativity? , 2011 .

[37]  Helen L. Partridge,et al.  Good practice report: blended learning , 2011 .

[38]  Liyan Song,et al.  Understanding Students' Online Interaction: Analysis of Discussion Board Postings , 2011 .

[39]  Julia Gressick,et al.  Distributed leadership in online groups , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[40]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Mobile guide system using problem-solving strategy for museum learning: a sequential learning behavioural pattern analysis , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[41]  Yingxu Wang,et al.  On the cognitive process of human problem solving , 2010, Cognitive Systems Research.

[42]  Heng-Li Yang,et al.  Creativity of student information system projects: From the perspective of network embeddedness , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[43]  David W. Johnson,et al.  An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning , 2009 .

[44]  Martin A. Andresen Asynchronous Discussion Forums: Success Factors, Outcomes, Assessments, and Limitations , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[45]  Thomas A. Brush,et al.  Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[46]  Wen-Ling Shih,et al.  Exploring the information literacy competence standards for elementary and high school teachers , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[47]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  E-Leadership and Virtual Teams , 2008, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[48]  Zahide Yildirim,et al.  Communication Behaviors and Trust in Collaborative Online Teams , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[49]  Shu-Ling Wang,et al.  The application of social cognitive theory to web-based learning through NetPorts , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[50]  Erping Zhu,et al.  Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions , 2006 .

[51]  Lewis A. Bizo,et al.  Team-skills training enhances collaborative learning , 2006 .

[52]  Agnes Kukulska-Hulme Group Leadership in Online Collaborative Learning , 2005 .

[53]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  Interactivity-as-Product and Interactivity-as-Process , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[54]  W. Jochems,et al.  The Effect of Functional Roles on Group Efficiency , 2004 .

[55]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Transformational and Transactional Leadership in Virtual and Physical Environments , 2003 .

[56]  Simon Hooper The effects of persistence and small group interaction during computer-based instruction , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[57]  Franziska Tschan,et al.  Ideal Cycles of Communication (or Cognitions) in Triads, Dyads, and Individuals , 2002 .

[58]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. , 2002 .

[59]  W. D. Murry,et al.  A Longitudinal Model of the Effects of Team Leadership and Group Potency on Group Performance , 2002 .

[60]  Sally J. McMillan Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documents, and Systems , 2002 .

[61]  Anthony J Gabriele,et al.  Collaborating With a Skilled Peer: The Influence of Achievement Goals and Perceptions of Partners' Competence on the Participation and Learning of Low-Achieving Students , 2001 .

[62]  Jim Hewitt Beyond Threaded Discourse , 2001 .

[63]  P. Sander,et al.  University Students' Expectations of Teaching , 2000 .

[64]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[65]  J. Wiley Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[66]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Discourse About Ideas: Monitoring and Regulation in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Environments , 1998, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[67]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[68]  R. Bakeman,et al.  Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis, 2nd ed. , 1997 .

[69]  J. D. Bakos,et al.  Communication Skills for the 21st Century , 1997 .

[70]  P. Pintrich A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). , 1991 .

[71]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[72]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis , 1986 .

[73]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .