Protein kinase A and TORC1 activate genes for ribosomal biogenesis by inactivating repressors encoded by Dot6 and its homolog Tod6

Genes required for ribosome biogenesis in yeast, referred to collectively as the Ribi regulon, are tightly regulated in coordination with nutrient availability and cellular growth rate. The promoters of a significant fraction of Ribi genes contain one or more copies of the RNA polymerases A and C (PAC) and/or ribosomal RNA-processing element (RRPE) motifs. Prompted by recent studies showing that the yeast protein Dot6 and its homolog Tod6 can bind to a PAC motif sequence in vitro and are required for efficient Ribi gene repression in response to heat shock, we have examined the role of Dot6 and Tod6 in nutrient control of Ribi gene expression in vivo. Our results indicate that PAC sites function as Dot6/Tod6-dependent repressor elements in vivo. Moreover, Dot6 and Tod6 mediate different nutrient signals, with Tod6 responsible for efficient repression of Ribi genes after inhibition of the nitrogen-sensitive TORC1 pathway and Dot6 responsible for repression after inhibition of the carbon-sensitive protein kinase A signaling pathway. Consistently, Dot6 and Tod6 are required for efficient repression of Ribi gene repression immediately after nutrient deprivation and for successful adaptation to nutrient limitation. Thus, these results establish Dot6/Tod6 as a direct link between nutrient availability, Ribi gene regulation, and growth control.

[1]  Mike Tyers,et al.  Systematic Identification of Pathways That Couple Cell Growth and Division in Yeast , 2002, Science.

[2]  D. Koller,et al.  Sfp1 is a stress- and nutrient-sensitive regulator of ribosomal protein gene expression. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Mike Tyers,et al.  How Cells Coordinate Growth and Division , 2004, Current Biology.

[4]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[5]  M. Tyers,et al.  A dynamic transcriptional network communicates growth potential to ribosome synthesis and critical cell size. , 2004, Genes & development.

[6]  Anthony C. Bishop,et al.  Magic bullets for protein kinases. , 2001, Trends in cell biology.

[7]  Robbie Loewith,et al.  Sch9 is a major target of TORC1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[8]  Jonathan R Warner,et al.  What better measure than ribosome synthesis? , 2004, Genes & development.

[9]  Noam Slonim,et al.  Glucose regulates transcription in yeast through a network of signaling pathways , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[10]  Christopher H Wade,et al.  The budding yeast rRNA and ribosome biosynthesis (RRB) regulon contains over 200 genes , 2006, Yeast.

[11]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Characterization of the rapamycin-sensitive phosphoproteome reveals that Sch9 is a central coordinator of protein synthesis. , 2009, Genes & development.

[12]  D. Hoyle,et al.  Growth control of the eukaryote cell: a systems biology study in yeast , 2007, Journal of biology.

[13]  Ole Winther,et al.  Growth-rate regulated genes have profound impact on interpretation of transcriptome profiling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Genome Biology.

[14]  Christopher L. Warren,et al.  A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[15]  S. J. Deminoff,et al.  Using Substrate-Binding Variants of the cAMP-Dependent Protein Kinase to Identify Novel Targets and a Kinase Domain Important for Substrate Interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Genetics.

[16]  Saeed Tavazoie,et al.  Microarray Profiling of Phage-Display Selections for Rapid Mapping of Transcription Factor–DNA Interactions , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[17]  Michael A. Beer,et al.  Predicting Gene Expression from Sequence , 2004, Cell.

[18]  W. Heideman,et al.  Stb3 Binds to Ribosomal RNA Processing Element Motifs That Control Transcriptional Responses to Growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  Alexandre V Morozov,et al.  Chromatin-dependent transcription factor accessibility rather than nucleosome remodeling predominates during global transcriptional restructuring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2009, Molecular biology of the cell.

[20]  Bianca Habermann,et al.  Chromatin Central: towards the comparative proteome by accurate mapping of the yeast proteomic environment , 2008, Genome Biology.

[21]  Matthew J. Brauer,et al.  Coordination of growth rate, cell cycle, stress response, and metabolic activity in yeast. , 2008, Molecular biology of the cell.

[22]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Science.

[23]  Saeed Tavazoie,et al.  Ras and Gpa2 Mediate One Branch of a Redundant Glucose Signaling Pathway in Yeast , 2004, PLoS biology.

[24]  J. Warner,et al.  Economics of ribosome biosynthesis. , 2001, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[25]  James R Broach,et al.  How Saccharomyces responds to nutrients. , 2008, Annual review of genetics.

[26]  Daniel E. Newburger,et al.  High-resolution DNA-binding specificity analysis of yeast transcription factors. , 2009, Genome research.