Paper-based concept map: the effects of tabletop on an expressive collaborative learning task

Augmented tabletops have recently attracted considerable attention in the literature. However, little has been known about the effects that these interfaces have on learning tasks. In this paper, we report on the results of an empirical study that explores the usage of tabletop systems in an expressive collaborative learning task. In particular, we focus on measuring the difference in learning outcomes at individual and group levels between students using two interfaces: traditional computer and augmented tabletop with tangible input. No significant effects of the interface on individual learning gain were found. However, groups using traditional computer learned significantly more from their partners than those using tabletop interface. Further analysis showed an interaction effect of the condition and the group heterogeneity on learning outcomes. We also present our qualitative findings in terms of how group interactions and strategy differ in the two conditions.

[1]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  Understanding children's collaborative interactions in shared environments , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[2]  Darren Leigh,et al.  DiamondTouch: a multi-user touch technology , 2001, UIST '01.

[3]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Taking it out of context: collaborating within and across cultures in face-to-face settings and via instant messaging , 2004, CSCW.

[4]  Paul Marshall,et al.  Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? , 2007, TEI.

[5]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Collaboration and interference: awareness with mice or touch input , 2008, CSCW.

[6]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Topobo: a constructive assembly system with kinetic memory , 2004, CHI.

[7]  Christian Müller-Tomfelde,et al.  Touchers and mousers: commonalities and differences in co-located collaboration with multiple input devices , 2008, CHI.

[8]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Exploring the effects of group size and table size on interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware , 2004, CSCW.

[9]  James R. Lewis,et al.  IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Equal Opportunities: Do Shareable Interfaces Promote More Group Participation Than Single User Displays? , 2009, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  P. Dillenbourg.  What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[12]  Jefferson Y. Han.  Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection , 2005, UIST.

[13]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  Quiet interfaces that help students think , 2006, UIST.

[14]  Allison Druin,et al.  Single display groupware: a model for co-present collaboration , 1999, CHI '99.

[15]  Jun Rekimoto,et al.  SmartSkin: an infrastructure for freehand manipulation on interactive surfaces , 2002, CHI.

[16]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  How pairs interact over a multimodal digital table , 2007, CHI.

[17]  Pierre David Wellner,et al.  Interacting with paper on the DigitalDesk , 1993, CACM.

[18]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Multi-finger interactions with papers on augmented tabletops , 2009, TEI.

[19]  Daniel J. Wigdor,et al.  Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays , 2007, CHI.

[20]  Rosemary Luckin,et al.  "I'm keeping those there, are you?" The role of a new user interface paradigm - Separate Control of Shared Space (SCOSS) - in the collaborative decision-making process , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Gabriel Mugny,et al.  Resource interdependence, student interactions and performance in cooperative learning , 2004 .

[22]  Masahiro Takatsuka,et al.  Put That There NOW: Group Dynamics of Tabletop Interaction under Time Pressure , 2007, Second Annual IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP'07).

[23]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  When the fingers do the talking: A study of group participation with varying constraints to a tabletop interface , 2008, 2008 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems.

[24]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  An exploratory study of input configuration and group process in a negotiation task using a large display , 2007, CHI.

[25]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Using job-shop scheduling tasks for evaluating collocated collaboration , 2008, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[26]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Illuminating light: a casual optics workbench , 1999, CHI EA '99.

[27]  Steve Benford,et al.  Physical manipulation: evaluating the potential for tangible designs , 2009, TEI.

[28]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best? , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[29]  N. Webb.  Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[30]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  The metaDESK: models and prototypes for tangible user interfaces , 1997, UIST '97.

[31]  Joyojeet Pal,et al.  Multiple mice for retention tasks in disadvantaged schools , 2007, CHI.

[32]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  Direct intentions: the effects of input devices on collaboration around a tabletop display , 2006, First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP '06).

[33]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  The effects of interaction technique on coordination in tabletop groupware , 2007, GI '07.

[34]  Taylor Francis,et al.  Equal opportunities: Do shareable interfaces promote more group participation than single users displays? , 2009 .