Pedagogical Changes in the Delivery of the First‐Course in Computer Science: Problem Solving, Then Programming

A teaching reform initiative, started in the spring semester of 1993 at the New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT), is described. The program seeks to increase student success in a freshman computer science course, and ultimately in the entire NJIT curriculum. The traditional teaching methods where the teacher presided over a lecture session supplying facts and figures, providing ideas, and presenting problems and their solutions, has been altered. The new learning environment described in this paper aims to create an all-inclusive setting inviting the students to make the transformation from passive learners to active participants. Rather than merely listening to lectures, students formulate problems and devise their own approaches to answering questions and finding solutions. Such a teaching/learning methodology requires instructional redesign and role redefinition. The presentation of class material is reordered as the teacher and students cross each other's confines becoming a more cohesive entity.

[1]  J. Ishida.  The Teaching of General Solution Methods to Pattern Finding Problems Through Focusing on an Evaluation and Improvement Process , 1997 .

[2]  Walter Doyle,et al.  Content Representation in Teachers' Definitions of Academic Work. R&D Report 6161. , 1985 .

[3]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  The initial knowledge state of college physics students , 1985 .

[4]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Learners as information processors: Legacies and limitations of educational psychology's second.. , 1996 .

[5]  R. Pea,et al.  TOOLS FOR BRIDGING THE CULTURES OF EVERYDAY AND SCIENTIFIC THINKING , 1987 .

[6]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[7]  D. Schunk.  Self-Efficacy for Learning and Performance. , 1996 .

[8]  Fadi P. Deek,et al.  Changing the students' role from passive listeners to active participants , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '93.

[9]  Uri Treisman.  Studying Students Studying Calculus: A Look at the Lives of Minority Mathematics Students in College. , 1992 .

[10]  A. V. Heuvelen,et al.  Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research‐based instructional strategies , 1991 .

[11]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Why changing the curriculum may not be enough , 1992 .

[12]  George D. Catalano,et al.  Some Ideas on the Teaching of Engineering Science: A Student Centered Approach , 1995 .

[13]  Howard Kimmel,et al.  Teaching for understanding: redesigning introductory courses to focus on the learner , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94.

[14]  W. Baird,et al.  Validity considerations for research on integrated-science process skills and formal reasoning ability , 1987 .

[15]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Teaching thinking and problem solving: Research foundations. , 1986 .

[16]  Lillian C. McDermott.  Guest Comment: How we teach and how students learn—A mismatch? , 1993 .