The conversion of the corn/soybean ecosystem to no‐till agriculture may result in a carbon sink

Mitigating or slowing an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration ([CO2]) has been the focus of international efforts, most apparent with the development of the Kyoto Protocol. Sequestration of carbon (C) in agricultural soils is being advocated as a method to assist in meeting the demands of an international C credit system. The conversion of conventionally tilled agricultural lands to no till is widely accepted as having a large-scale sequestration potential. In this study, C flux measurements over a no-till corn/soybean agricultural ecosystem over 6 years were coupled with estimates of C release associated with agricultural practices to assess the net biome productivity (NBP) of this no-till ecosystem. Estimates of NBP were also calculated for the conventionally tilled corn/soybean ecosystem assuming net ecosystem exchange is C neutral. These measurements were scaled to the US as a whole to determine the sequestration potential of corn/soybean ecosystems, under current practices where 10% of agricultural land devoted to this ecosystem is no-tilled and under a hypothetical scenario where 100% of the land is not tilled. The estimates of this analysis show that current corn/soybean agriculture in the US releases ∼7.2 Tg C annually, with no-till sequestering ∼2.2 Tg and conventional-till releasing ∼9.4 Tg. The complete conversion of land area to no till might result in 21.7 Tg C sequestered annually, representing a net C flux difference of ∼29 Tg C. These results demonstrate that large-scale conversion to no-till practices, at least for the corn/soybean ecosystem, could potentially offset ca. 2% of annual US carbon emissions.

[1]  Carl J. Bernacchi,et al.  Carbon budget of mature no-till ecosystem in North Central Region of the United States , 2005 .

[2]  R. Lal Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change , 2004 .

[3]  R. Lal Agricultural activities and the global carbon cycle , 2004, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[4]  T. Meyers,et al.  An assessment of storage terms in the surface energy balance of maize and soybean , 2004 .

[5]  Pete Smith,et al.  Carbon sequestration in the agricultural soils of Europe , 2004 .

[6]  Thomas B. Voigt,et al.  A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water , 2004 .

[7]  R. Lal,et al.  Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security , 2004, Science.

[8]  Pete Smith Carbon sequestration in croplands: The potential in Europe and the global context , 2004 .

[9]  Johan Six,et al.  The potential to mitigate global warming with no‐tillage management is only realized when practised in the long term , 2004 .

[10]  R. Lal,et al.  Conservation tillage for carbon sequestration , 1997, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[11]  J. Six,et al.  Assessing the impact of land‐use change on soil C sequestration in agricultural soils by means of organic matter fractionation and stable C isotopes , 2003 .

[12]  Gregg Marland,et al.  Net carbon flux from agriculture: Carbon emissions, carbon sequestration, crop yield, and land-use change , 2003 .

[13]  Gregg Marland,et al.  Managing soil organic carbon in agriculture: the net effect on greenhouse gas emissions , 2003 .

[14]  Edward C. Krug,et al.  Identification of factors that aid carbon sequestration in Illinois agricultural systems , 2003 .

[15]  W. Post,et al.  Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation : A global data analysis , 2002 .

[16]  G. Marland,et al.  A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States , 2002 .

[17]  G. Marland,et al.  Net carbon flux from agricultural ecosystems: methodology for full carbon cycle analyses. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[18]  R. Derpsch Keynote: Frontiers in Conservation Tillage and Advances in Conservation Practice , 2002 .

[19]  R. Lal World cropland soils as a source or sink for atmospheric carbon , 2001 .

[20]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  THE VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL ORGANIC CARBON AND ITS RELATION TO CLIMATE AND VEGETATION , 2000 .

[21]  N. Uri Perceptions on the use of no-till farming in production agriculture in the United States: an analysis of survey results , 2000 .

[22]  R. G. Lawford,et al.  A midterm report on the GEWEX Continental-Scale International Project (GCIP) , 1999 .

[23]  Corinna Rebmann,et al.  Productivity of forests in the Eurosiberian boreal region and their potential to act as a carbon sink –‐ a synthesis , 1999 .

[24]  J. Schepers,et al.  Irrigated Corn Yield and Nitrogen Accumulation Response in a Comparison of No-till and Conventional Till: Tillage and Surface-Residue Variables , 1998 .

[25]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Cropland to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect , 1998 .

[26]  S. Aref,et al.  Tillage impacts on depth distribution of total and particulate organic matter in three Illinois soils , 1998 .

[27]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Agricultural soils as a sink to mitigate CO2 emissions , 1997 .

[28]  O. R. Jones,et al.  Crop rotation and tillage effects on organic carbon sequestration in the semiarid southern Great Plains , 1997 .

[29]  T. O. Barnwell,et al.  Assessment of alternative management practices and policies affecting soil carbon in agroecosystems of the central United States , 1994 .

[30]  T. Addiscott,et al.  Crop Ecology. Productivity and Management in Agricultural Systems , 1994 .

[31]  W. Schlesinger Carbon Balance in Terrestrial Detritus , 1977 .