The Relative Effectiveness of 10 Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment Programs in the United States. Technical Report.

6 Jump down to document THE ARTS CHILD POLICY CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world.

[1]  Robert J. Williams,et al.  A Comprehensive and Comparative Review of Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment Outcome , 2006 .

[2]  Terry L. Schell,et al.  Dynamic effects among patients' treatment needs, beliefs, and utilization: a prospective study of adolescents in drug treatment. , 2005, Health services research.

[3]  J. McKay,et al.  Reconsidering the evaluation of addiction treatment: from retrospective follow-up to concurrent recovery monitoring. , 2005, Addiction.

[4]  Thomas Babor,et al.  The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study: main findings from two randomized trials. , 2004, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[5]  Christy K. Scott A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow-up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers. , 2004, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[6]  H. Liddle,et al.  Early Intervention for Adolescent Substance Abuse: Pretreatment to Posttreatment Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Multidimensional Family Therapy and Peer Group Treatment , 2004, Journal of psychoactive drugs.

[7]  P. Basch Quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  A. Morral,et al.  Retention Of Court-referred Youths In Residential Treatment Programs: Client Characteristics And Treatment Process Effects , 2003, The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse.

[9]  Christy K. Scott,et al.  The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) experiment: rationale, study design and analysis plans. , 2002, Addiction.

[10]  M. Dennis,et al.  Preliminary outcomes from the assertive continuing care experiment for adolescents discharged from residential treatment. , 2002, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[11]  M. Tejeda,et al.  MULTIDIMENSIONAL FAMILY THERAPY FOR ADOLESCENT DRUG ABUSE: RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL , 2001, The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse.

[12]  G. Imbens,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score , 2000 .

[13]  K. Winters Treating Adolescents with Substance Use Disorders: An Overview of Practice Issues and Treatment Outcome , 1999, Substance abuse.

[14]  N. Azrin,et al.  Youth Drug Abuse Treatment: A Controlled Outcome Study , 1994 .

[15]  S. Henggeler,et al.  Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: an effective alternative to incarcerating serious juvenile offenders. , 1992, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[16]  Subir Ghosh,et al.  Statistical Analysis With Missing Data , 1988 .

[17]  P. Holland Statistics and Causal Inference , 1985 .

[18]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[19]  D. R. Davis Therapeutic Communities , 1977, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[20]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[21]  D. McCaffrey,et al.  Effectiveness of Community-Based Treatment for Substance Abusing Adolescents : 12-month Outcomes From A Case-Control Evaluation of a Phoenix Academy , 2004 .

[22]  D. McCaffrey,et al.  Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[23]  M. Chaffin,et al.  Culturally competent substance abuse treatment for American Indian and Alaska native youths. , 2003 .

[24]  A. Morral,et al.  Adolescent substance abuse treatment in the United States: exemplary models from a national evaluation study. , 2003 .

[25]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[26]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[27]  G. Ridgeway The State of Boosting ∗ , 1999 .

[28]  Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. , 1997, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[29]  Freeman J. Dyson,et al.  The same and not the same , 1995 .