Urban form and last-mile goods movement: Factors affecting vehicle miles travelled and emissions

Abstract There are established relationships between urban form and passenger travel, but less is known about urban form and goods movement. The work presented in this paper evaluates how the design of a delivery service and the urban form in which it operates affects its performance, as measured by vehicle miles travelled, CO 2 , NOx, and PM10 emissions. This work compares simulated amounts of VMT, CO 2 , NOx, and PM10 generated by last mile travel in a number of different development patterns and in a number of different goods movement structures, including various warehouse locations. Last mile travel includes personal travel or delivery vehicles delivering goods to customers. Regression models for each goods movement scheme and models that compare sets of goods movement schemes were developed. The most influential variables in all models were measures of roadway density and proximity of a service area to the regional warehouse. These efforts will support urban planning for goods movement, inform policies designed to mitigate the impacts of goods movement vehicles, and provide insights into achieving sustainability targets, especially as online shopping and goods delivery become more prevalent.

[1]  D. Andreoli,et al.  The rise of mega distribution centers and the impact on logistical uncertainty , 2010 .

[2]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Logistics Systems Analysis , 1991 .

[3]  Lassi Linnanen,et al.  Effects of E‐Commerce on Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Case Study of Grocery Home Delivery in Finland , 2002 .

[4]  R. Cervero,et al.  TWENTY YEARS OF THE BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM: LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS , 1997 .

[5]  Anne Goodchild,et al.  Comparison of Vehicle Miles Traveled and Pollution from Three Goods Movement Strategies , 2014 .

[6]  Jose A Gomez-Ibanez,et al.  TRB Special Report: Driving and the Built Environment: The Effects of Compact Development on Motorized Travel, Energy Use, and CO2 Emissions , 2010 .

[7]  A Vernez-Moudon,et al.  Strategies and Tools to Implement Transportation-Efficient Development: A Reference Manual. Phase 2 of Integrating Land Use and Transportation Investment Decision Making , 2003 .

[8]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California , 2005 .

[9]  Agostino Nuzzolo,et al.  Ex-ante assessment of urban freight transport policies , 2010 .

[10]  Anne Goodchild,et al.  Evaluating the Efficacy of Shared-use Vehicles for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A U.S. Case Study of Grocery Delivery , 2012 .

[11]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[12]  R. Cervero JOBS-HOUSING BALANCE REVISITED: TRENDS AND IMPACTS IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA. , 1996 .

[13]  Anne Goodchild,et al.  Evaluating the impacts of density on urban goods movement externalities , 2017 .

[14]  T. Crainic,et al.  ADVANCED FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS FOR CONGESTED URBAN AREAS , 2004 .

[15]  R. Cervero Jobs-Housing Balancing and Regional Mobility , 1989 .

[16]  Anne Goodchild,et al.  Evaluating CO2 emissions, cost, and service quality trade-offs in an urban delivery system case study , 2011 .

[17]  Laetitia Dablanc,et al.  The impacts of logistics sprawl: How does the location of parcel transport terminals affect the energy efficiency of goods’ movements in Paris and what can we do about it? , 2010 .

[18]  L. Frank,et al.  Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice , 2007 .

[19]  J. Sallis,et al.  Many Pathways from Land Use to Health: Associations between Neighborhood Walkability and Active Transportation, Body Mass Index, and Air Quality , 2006 .

[20]  Markus Hesse,et al.  Shipping news: the implications of electronic commerce for logistics and freight transport , 2002 .