IPS-MAC: an informative preamble sampling MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks

Radio transceivers are the main source of energy consumption in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) where the source of energy supply is non-rechargeable battery. Several MAC protocols have been proposed in order to efficiently conserve energy in the link layer via duty-cycling. Low power listening (LPL) methods have been shown to outperform other schemes in lightly loaded situations which are common in environment monitoring applications. Nonetheless, as the network becomes dense, in LPL protocols such as BMAC a large number of nodes stay awake for each transmission, resulting in high levels of energy consumption. This paper introduces the informative preamble sampling (IPS) protocol in which a transmitter implicitly embeds information about its intended receiver via the power at which the preamble is transmitted. This results in far fewer nodes staying awake for each preamble. Upon hearing the preamble, a receiver executes a decision-making algorithm to decide whether to stay awake. If the decision-making algorithm is too lax, then more nodes stay awake following the preamble. On the other hand if the algorithm is too strict, it is likely that the intended receiver misses the preamble. In this paper we derive the optimal operating points for the IPS protocol. We show analytically that the IPS protocol can achieve a gain in energy by at least a factor of 2 over BMAC. We also conduct extensive simulations to show that IPS can achieve significant energy gains compared to BMAC.

[1]  David E. Culler,et al.  Mica: A Wireless Platform for Deeply Embedded Networks , 2002, IEEE Micro.

[2]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Medium access control with coordinated adaptive sleeping for wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[3]  Marco Zuniga,et al.  Analyzing the transitional region in low power wireless links , 2004, 2004 First Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2004. IEEE SECON 2004..

[4]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[5]  David E. Culler,et al.  Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks , 2004, SenSys '04.

[6]  John S. Heidemann,et al.  Ultra-low duty cycle MAC with scheduled channel polling , 2006, SenSys '06.

[7]  Marco Zuniga,et al.  Link Layer Models for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2004 .

[8]  M. Lakshmanan,et al.  AN ADAPTIVE ENERGY EFFICIENT MAC PROTOCOL FOR WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS , 2009 .

[9]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Sensor Networks , 2002, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[10]  Katia Obraczka,et al.  Energy-efficient collision-free medium access control for wireless sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[11]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[12]  Vikram Srinivasan,et al.  Topology Control for Delay Sensitive Applications in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, Mob. Networks Appl..

[13]  Christian C. Enz,et al.  Poster abstract: wiseMAC, an ultra low power MAC protocol for the wiseNET wireless sensor network , 2003, SenSys '03.

[14]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  An adaptive energy-efficient and low-latency MAC for data gathering in wireless sensor networks , 2004, 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 2004. Proceedings..