Decision support for climate change adaptation planning in the US: why it needs a coordinated internet-based practitioners’ network

Decision support resources are emerging across the United States to address the adaptation and mitigation challenges associated with climate variability and change. In theory, climate-related decision support identifies the need to move beyond the linear dissemination of information from experts to decision-makers. Interviews with researchers and federal program managers, however, show that in practice there are still wide gaps between the development of climate science and its application. Lessons learned in two example cases of decision support experiments are discussed to highlight some of the on-going challenges in applying climate science, e.g. defining decision support, involving decision-makers, and determining effectiveness. The published literature also shows these reoccurring challenges but emphasizes more collaboration between science and decision-makers as this improves the relevance, compatibility, and accessibility of climate science information and can increase users’ receptiveness. This article proposes that the US Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) can help the development of decision support resources, in one way, by coordinating an Internet-based practitioners’ network. A coordinated network could provide opportunities for climate-related decision support practitioners to build collaborative partnerships, share lessons-learned, provide feedback to the USGCRP, and thereby assist the transition of science into decision-making processes to better address adaptation planning.

[1]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[2]  S. Rayner,et al.  Weather Forecasts are for Wimps: Why Water Resource Managers Do Not Use Climate Forecasts , 2005 .

[3]  E. McNie.  Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature , 2007 .

[4]  Kerim Aydin,et al.  Visualizing the Food-Web Effects of Fishing for Tunas in the Pacific Ocean , 2004 .

[5]  G. Carbone,et al.  Climate Science and Decision Making , 2007 .

[6]  David W. Cash,et al.  Countering the Loading-Dock Approach to Linking Science and Decision Making , 2006 .

[7]  Thomas E. Downing,et al.  Stakeholder Networks: Improving Seasonal Climate Forecasts , 2004 .

[8]  J. Gamble,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Climate Variability and Change on Regional Water Resources: The Implications for Stakeholders , 2013 .

[9]  S. Daniels,et al.  Collaborative learning: Improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management , 1996 .

[10]  T. Wilbanks,et al.  Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[11]  B. Smit,et al.  Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability , 2006 .

[12]  David A. J. Seargent,et al.  Our Changing Planet , 2012 .

[13]  Sharon A. Jones,et al.  Evaluating the Science-Policy Interface for Climate Change Research , 1999 .

[14]  A. Fisher,et al.  Consortium for Atlantic Regional Assessment: Information Tools for Community Adaptation to Changes in Climate or Land Use , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  D. E. Stokes.  Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[16]  R. Pielke,et al.  Who decides? Forecasts and responsibilities in the 1997 Red River flood , 1999 .

[17]  W. Neil Adger,et al.  Does Adaptive Management of Natural Resources Enhance Resilience to Climate Change , 2004 .

[18]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  R. Tol,et al.  Weathering Climate Change - Some Simple Rules to Guide Adaptation Decisions , 1999 .

[20]  Frank Biermann.  Knowledge for the sustainability transition: the challenge for Social Science , 2004 .

[21]  J. Pielke.  The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics , 2007 .

[22]  Roger E. Kasperson,et al.  Rerouting the stakeholder express , 2006 .

[23]  Carla Roncoli,et al.  Ethnographic and participatory approaches to research on farmers responses to climate predictions , 2006 .

[24]  van Hans Ees,et al.  Proceedings 2006 IEEE international conference on management of innovation and technology , 2006, International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology.

[25]  B. Wellman,et al.  Netting Scholars , 2001 .

[26]  R. Pielke.  Rethinking the role of adaptation in climate policy , 1998 .

[27]  G. Fragidis,et al.  From Repositories of Best Practices to Networks of Best Practices , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology.

[28]  Steve Selin,et al.  Modeling Stakeholder Perceptions of Collaborative Initiative Effectiveness , 2000 .

[29]  E. Weber.  Experience-Based and Description-Based Perceptions of Long-Term Risk: Why Global Warming does not Scare us (Yet) , 2006 .

[30]  Preston Smalley,et al.  Creating a system to share user experience best practices at eBay , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[31]  M. G. Morgan,et al.  Why Conventional Tools for Policy Analysis Are Often Inadequate for Problems of Global Change , 1999 .

[32]  David H. Guston,et al.  Integrating Climate Forecasts and Societal Decision Making: Challenges to an Emergent Boundary Organization , 2001 .

[33]  E L Miles,et al.  An approach to designing a national climate service , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  North Florida Dairy Farmer Perceptions Toward the Use of Seasonal Climate Forecast Technology , 2006 .

[35]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[36]  Patrick D. Smith,et al.  ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION : LESSONS FROM THE FIELD , 1999 .

[37]  Thomas C. Beierle.  Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions , 2010 .

[38]  Rebecca J. Romsdahl,et al.  What does decision support mean to the climate change research community? , 2009 .

[39]  W. Adger,et al.  Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity , 2001 .

[40]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  What is a Good Decision? Criteria for Environmental Decision Making , 2003 .

[41]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  From Shared Databases to Communities of Practice: A Taxonomy of Collaboratories , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[42]  S. Daniels,et al.  Working Through Environmental Conflict: The Collaborative Learning Approach , 2001 .

[43]  R. Pielke,et al.  The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science , 2007 .

[44]  Peter E. Hildebrand,et al.  AgClimate: a case study in participatory decision support system development , 2008 .

[45]  James W. Jones,et al.  AgClimate: A climate forecast information system for agricultural risk management in the southeastern USA , 2006 .

[46]  E. Herricks,et al.  Interaction Between Scientists and Nonscientists in Community-Based Watershed Management: Emergence of the Concept of Stream Naturalization , 1999, Environmental management.

[47]  D. Guston.  Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction , 2001 .

[48]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[49]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[50]  Harold C. Relyea.  Paperwork reduction act reauthorization and government information management issues , 2000, Gov. Inf. Q..

[51]  Improving Outreach in Atmospheric Sciences: Assessment of Users of Climate Products , 2004 .

[52]  Lisa Dilling,et al.  Towards science in support of decision making: characterizing the supply of carbon cycle science , 2007 .

[53]  Joseph Arvai,et al.  Economy, Politics and Institutions: From Adaptation to Adaptive Management in Climate Change , 2006 .

[54]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[55]  Lisa Dilling,et al.  The opportunities and responsibility for carbon cycle science in the U.S. , 2007 .

[56]  K. Wernstedt,et al.  Flood Planning and Climate Forecasts at the Local Level , 2002 .

[57]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research , 1980 .

[58]  D. Roush.  Making collaboration work : lessons from innovation in natural resource management , 2002 .

[59]  B. Hobbs,et al.  The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in the integrated assessment of climate change: implications for IA practitioners , 2003 .

[60]  Thomas Johnson,et al.  A decision inventory approach for improving decision support for climate change impact assessment and adaptation , 2007 .

[61]  Marianne de Laet.  Research in science and technology studies : knowledge and technology transfer , 2002 .

[62]  David W. Cash,et al.  “In Order to Aid in Diffusing Useful and Practical Information”: Agricultural Extension and Boundary Organizations , 2001 .

[63]  M Granger Morgan,et al.  Learning from the U.S. National Assessment of Climate Change Impacts. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[64]  Barbara Gray,et al.  Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems , 1989 .

[65]  B. Morehouse,et al.  Climate and Urban Water Providers in Arizona: An Analysis of Vulnerability Perceptions and Climate Information , 2003 .

[66]  S. Mccool,et al.  Exploring the Concept of “Ownership” in Natural Resource Planning , 2005 .

[67]  S. Rayner,et al.  Human choice and climate change , 1998 .

[68]  K. Taylor,et al.  Planktonic dimethylsulfide and cloud albedo: An estimate of the feedback response , 1991 .