Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict.

This study examined the effects of gender and social structure on the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. In this pattern, the demander, usually the woman, pressures the other through emotional requests, criticism, and complaints, and the withdrawer, usually the man, retreats through defensiveness and passive inaction. In this study, 31 couples were assessed in 2 conflict situations: 1 in which husband wanted a change in wife and 1 in which wife wanted a change in husband. Data from husbands, wives, and observers consistently revealed a significant main effect of gender (wife-demand/husband-withdraw interaction was more likely than husband-demand/wife-withdraw interaction) and a significant interaction of gender and conflict structure (wife-demand/husband-withdraw interaction was more likely than the reverse only when discussing a change the wife wanted). Separate analyses of demand and withdraw behaviors indicated that both husband and wife were more likely to be demanding when discussing a change they wanted and more likely to be withdrawing when discussing a change their partner wanted. However, men were overall more withdrawn than women, but women were not overall more demanding than men.

[1]  H. Kelley,et al.  Sex differences in comments made during conflict within close heterosexual pairs , 1978 .

[2]  Marital conflict resolution. , 1988 .

[3]  Willard Waller,et al.  The family : a dynamic interpretation , 1951 .

[4]  G. Margolin,et al.  Areas of Change Questionnaire: A Practical Approach to Marital Assessment. , 1983 .

[5]  D. Wile Couples Therapy: A Nontraditional Approach , 1981 .

[6]  N. Jacobson Beyond empiricism: The politics of marital therapy , 1983 .

[7]  John M. Gottman,et al.  The social psychophysiology of marriage. , 1988 .

[8]  K. Hahlweg,et al.  Understanding major mental disorder : the contribution of family interaction research , 1987 .

[9]  Joe H. Brown,et al.  Family Therapy: Theory and Practice , 1976 .

[10]  A. Christensen Dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples. , 1988 .

[11]  C. Gilligan In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1982. , 1982 .

[12]  H. Kelley Personal Relationships: Their Structures and Processes , 1979 .

[13]  A. Christensen Detection of conflict patterns in couples. , 1987 .

[14]  Worlds of Pain: Life in the Working-Class Family , 1977 .

[15]  Lillian B. Rubin,et al.  Intimate Strangers: Men and Women Together , 1983 .

[16]  A. Christensen,et al.  Assessment of Dysfunctional Interaction Patterns in Couples. , 1983 .

[17]  J. Gottman,et al.  Marital interaction and satisfaction: a longitudinal view. , 1989, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[18]  L. Navran Communication and Adjustment in Marriage , 1967 .

[19]  N. Jacobson,et al.  Marital Therapy , 1986 .

[20]  A. Napier The Rejection‐Intrusion Pattern: A Central Family Dynamic , 1978 .

[21]  Harold L. Raush,et al.  Communication conflict and marriage. , 1975 .

[22]  Psychological factors in marital happiness. , 1939 .

[23]  Blue-Collar Marriage , 1967 .

[24]  G. Spanier Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads , 1976 .

[25]  B. Wampold,et al.  Sequential analysis of conflict and accord in distressed and nondistressed marital partners. , 1981, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[26]  C. Notarius,et al.  Emotional expression in husbands and wives. , 1982 .

[27]  J. Gottman Marital Interaction: Experimental Investigations , 1980 .

[28]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[29]  M. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Perspectives on marital interaction , 1988 .