Radiation Risk to Children From Computed Tomography

Imaging studies that use ionizing radiation are an essential tool for the evaluation of many disorders of childhood. Ionizing radiation is used in radiography, fluoroscopy, angiography, and computed tomography scanning. Computed tomography is of particular interest because of its relatively high radiation dose and wide use. Consensus statements on radiation risk suggest that it is reasonable to act on the assumption that low-level radiation may have a small risk of causing cancer. The medical community should seek ways to decrease radiation exposure by using radiation doses as low as reasonably achievable and by performing these studies only when necessary. There is wide agreement that the benefits of an indicated computed tomography scan far outweigh the risks. Pediatric health care professionals’ roles in the use of computed tomography on children include deciding when a computed tomography scan is necessary and discussing the risk with patients and families. Radiologists should be a source of consultation when forming imaging strategies and should create specific protocols with scanning techniques optimized for pediatric patients. Families and patients should be encouraged to ask questions about the risks and benefits of computed tomography scanning. The information in this report is provided to aid in decision-making and discussions with the health care team, patients, and families.

[1]  P. McCoubrie.  X-ray dose training: are we exposed to enough? , 2005, Clinical radiology.

[2]  James A Brink,et al.  Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. , 2004, Radiology.

[3]  M. Kalra,et al.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. , 2004, Radiology.

[4]  Donald P Frush,et al.  Computed tomography and radiation: understanding the issues. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[5]  Donald P Frush,et al.  Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[6]  O. Linton,et al.  National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Donald P Frush,et al.  Pediatric multidetector body CT. , 2003, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[8]  Philip H Heintz,et al.  CT scanning: a major source of radiation exposure. , 2002, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[9]  E. Hall,et al.  Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[10]  W Huda,et al.  Radiation exposure and image quality in chest CT examinations. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  D. Frush,et al.  The pros and cons of imaging options , 2001 .

[12]  D. Frush,et al.  Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  C A Kelsey,et al.  CT scanning: patterns of use and dose , 2000, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[14]  D A Pierce,et al.  Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, part II. Noncancer mortality: 1950-1990. , 1999, Radiation research.

[15]  W Huda,et al.  An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients. , 1997, Radiology.

[16]  D A Pierce,et al.  Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950-1990. , 1996, Radiation research.

[17]  D. Tayloe,et al.  Pediatrics , 1927, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[18]  Qu Liang,et al.  The United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation , 1965, Nature.