New diagnostic tests for the function of utricles, saccules and somatic graviceptors.

Clinical tests that allow us to discriminate between utricular, saccular and somatic effects on gravity perception and control are desirable but wanting. A new test battery is presented which combines four experimental paradigms based on the subjective horizontal body position (SHP), namely, a test on a tiltable board and on a sled centrifuge under varied leg position, with two paradigms based on the subjective visual vertical (SVV). It is shown by a combination of experiments and deductions, that, why, and how these tests can separate the effects of otoliths from those of somatic graviceptors, the effects of the utricles from those of the saccules, and the effects of the constituents of the somatic graviception from each other. The present study demonstrates the capabilities of the tests as well as their limitations.

[1]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  The relative effect of saccular and somatosensory information on spatial perception and control. , 1988, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[2]  A. Böhmer,et al.  The subjective visual vertical as a clinical parameter of vestibular function in peripheral vestibular diseases. , 1995, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[3]  U. Bucher,et al.  An analysis of ocular counterrolling in response to body positions in three-dimensional space. , 1992, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[4]  Horst Mittelstaedt.  Subjective vertical in weightlessness , 1985 .

[5]  Werner Haustein,et al.  Head-centric visual localization with lateral body tilt , 1992, Vision Research.

[6]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  Somatic versus Vestibular Gravity Reception in Man , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[7]  R. Magnus,et al.  Körperstellung: Experimentell-Physiologische Untersuchungen über die Einzelnen bei der Körperstellung in Tätigkeit tretenden Reflexe, über ihr Zusammenwirken und ihre Störungen , 1924 .

[8]  C. Markham,et al.  Ocular counterrolling as an indicator of vestibular otolith function , 1983, Neurology.

[9]  H Bekkering,et al.  Influence of visual, vestibular, cervical, and somatosensory tilt information on ocular rotation and perception of the horizontal. , 1992, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[10]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  The role of the pitched-up orientation of the otoliths in two recent models of the subjective vertical. , 1989, Biological cybernetics.

[11]  Horst Mittelstaedt,et al.  Inflight and postflight results on the causation of inversion illusion and space sickness , 1987 .

[12]  J Dichgans,et al.  Optokinetic-graviceptive interaction in different head positions. , 1974, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[13]  W. Haustein,et al.  Evaluation of retinal orientation and gaze direction in the perception of the vertical , 1990, Vision Research.

[14]  Horst Mittelstaedt,et al.  The role of the otoliths in the perception of the orientation of self and world to the vertical , 1991 .