Umbrella Data Management Plans to Integrate FAIR Data: Lessons From the ISIDORe and BY-COVID Consortia for Pandemic Preparedness

The Horizon Europe project ISIDORe is dedicated to pandemic preparedness and responsiveness research. It brings together 17 research infrastructures (RIs) and networks to provide a broad range of services to infectious disease researchers. An efficient and structured treatment of data is central to ISIDORe’s aim to furnish seamless access to its multidisciplinary catalogue of services, and to ensure that users’ results are treated FAIRly. ISIDORe therefore requires a data management plan (DMP) covering both access management and research outputs, applicable over a broad range of disciplines, and compatible with the constraints and existing practices of its diverse partners. Here, we describe how, to achieve that aim, we undertook an iterative, step-by-step, process to build a community-approved living document, identifying good practices and processes, on the basis of use cases, presented as proof of concepts. International fora such as the RDA and EOSC, and primarily the BY-COVID project, furnished registries, tools and online data platforms, as well as standards, and the support of data scientists. Together, these elements provide a path for building an umbrella, FAIR-compliant DMP, aligned as fully as possible with FAIR principles, which could also be applied as a framework for data management harmonisation in other large-scale, challenge-driven projects. Finally, we discuss how data management and reuse can be further improved through the use of knowledge models when writing DMPs and, how, in the future, an inter-RI network of data stewards could contribute to the establishment of a community of practice, to be integrated subsequently into planned trans-RI competence centres.

[1]  Allyson L. Lister,et al.  The FAIR Cookbook - the essential resource for and by FAIR doers , 2023, Scientific data.

[2]  M. Chiusano,et al.  An iterative and interdisciplinary categorisation process towards FAIRer digital resources for sensitive life-sciences data , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Md. Jamal Hossain,et al.  Semantic Web in Healthcare: A Systematic Literature Review of Application, Research Gap, and Future Research Avenues , 2022, International journal of clinical practice.

[4]  Paul T. Groth,et al.  Creating lightweight FAIR Digital Objects with RO-Crate , 2022, Research Ideas and Outcomes.

[5]  Olga X. Giraldo,et al.  A FAIRification roadmap for ELIXIR Software Management Plans , 2022, Research Ideas and Outcomes.

[6]  M. Hutson Taking the pain out of data sharing , 2022, Nature.

[7]  P. Holub,et al.  Lightweight Distributed Provenance Model for Complex Real–world Environments , 2022, Scientific Data.

[8]  J. Ewbank,et al.  Pandemic preparedness — Europe launches research consortium , 2022, Nature.

[9]  Paul T. Groth,et al.  Packaging research artefacts with RO-Crate , 2021, Data Sci..

[10]  Sebastian Hellmann,et al.  FAIR Linked Data - Towards a Linked Data Backbone for Users and Machines , 2021, WWW.

[11]  M. Hudson,et al.  The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance , 2020, Data Sci. J..

[12]  Peter Neish,et al.  RDA DMP Common Standard for Machine-actionable Data Management Plans , 2020 .

[13]  Vassilios Ioannidis,et al.  FAIRness Literacy: The Achilles' Heel of Applying FAIR Principles , 2020, Data Sci. J..

[14]  A. Specht,et al.  PARSEC Data and Digital Output Management Plan and Workbook , 2020 .

[15]  Martina Stockhause,et al.  The TRUST Principles for digital repositories , 2020, Scientific Data.

[16]  Thomas Shafee,et al.  Wikidata as a knowledge graph for the life sciences , 2020, eLife.

[17]  R. Grant,et al.  Developing a Research Data Policy Framework for All Journals and Publishers , 2020, Data Sci. J..

[18]  B. Mons Invest 5% of research funds in ensuring data are reusable , 2020, Nature.

[19]  Hannah C. Gunderman,et al.  Data Curation Profiling to Assess Data Management Training Needs and Practices to Inform a Toolkit , 2020, Data Sci. J..

[20]  Robert Pergl,et al.  "Data Stewardship Wizard": A Tool Bringing Together Researchers, Data Stewards, and Data Experts around Data Management Planning , 2019, Data Sci. J..

[21]  Massimiliano Izzo,et al.  FAIRsharing as a community approach to standards, repositories and policies , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  Fabian Prasser,et al.  Enhancing Reuse of Data and Biological Material in Medical Research: From FAIR to FAIR-Health , 2018, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[23]  Dipak Kalra,et al.  Sharing and reuse of individual participant data from clinical trials: principles and recommendations , 2017, BMJ Open.

[24]  Sarah Christine Williams,et al.  From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project , 2016 .

[25]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[26]  William K. Michener,et al.  Ten Simple Rules for Creating a Good Data Management Plan , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Florence Debarre,et al.  The Availability of Research Data Declines Rapidly with Article Age , 2013, Current Biology.

[28]  James A. Jacobs,et al.  Preserving research data , 2004, Commun. ACM.

[29]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  ISO 23494: Biotechnology - Provenance Information Model for Biological Specimen And Data , 2021, IPAW.

[30]  P. Manghi,et al.  Data Management Plans and Linked Open Data: exploiting machine actionable data management plans through Open Science Graphs , 2020, Workshop on Data and Research Objects Management for Linked Open Science.

[31]  Tomasz Miksa,et al.  Research Object Crates and Machine-actionable Data Management Plans , 2020, DaMaLOS.

[32]  G. Denyer,et al.  A Review of the History, Advocacy and Efficacy of Data Management Plans , 2020, International Journal of Digital Curation.