Design of energy efficient optical networks with software enabled integrated control plane

The growing energy consumption has posed new challenges for the future development of networks. Some earlier work has proposed solutions to improve energy consumption based on the existing control plane, for example, node/links sleeping. This study presents a new possibility to reduce network energy consumption by proposing a new integrated control plane structure utilising Software Defined Networking technologies. The integrated control plane increases the efficiencies of exchanging control information across different network domains, while introducing new possibilities to the routing methods and the control over quality of service (QoS). The structure is defined as an overlay generalised multi-protocol label switching (GMPLS) control model. With the defined structure, the integrated control plane is able to gather information from different domains (i.e. optical core network and the access networks), and enable energy efficiency networking over a wider area. In the case presented, the integrated control plane collects the network energy related information and the QoS requirements of different types of traffic. This information is used to define the specific group of traffic's (flow's) routing behaviours. With the flexibility of the routing structure, results show that the energy efficiency of the network can be improved without compromising the QoS for delay/blocking sensitive services.

[1]  Sarah Ruepp,et al.  Analysis of energy efficiency in dynamic optical networks employing solar energy sources , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC).

[2]  Francesco Palmieri,et al.  Energy-Aware RWA for WDM Networks with Dual Power Sources , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[3]  Dimitri Papadimitriou,et al.  Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) for Point-to-Multipoint TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs) , 2007, RFC.

[4]  Sam Hartman,et al.  Security Requirements in the Software Defined Networking Model , 2013 .

[5]  Hyeon Yeong Choi,et al.  Demonstration of BER-Adaptive WSON Employing Flexible Transmitter/Receiver With an Extended OpenFlow-Based Control Plane , 2013, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[6]  Sujata Banerjee,et al.  DevoFlow: scaling flow management for high-performance networks , 2011, SIGCOMM 2011.

[7]  Reza Nejabati,et al.  Integrated OpenFlow — GMPLS control plane: An overlay model for software defined packet over optical networks , 2011, 2011 37th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication.

[8]  Jennifer Rexford,et al.  Scalable Network Virtualization in Software-Defined Networks , 2013, IEEE Internet Computing.

[9]  Lei Liu,et al.  From GMPLS to PCE/GMPLS to OpenFlow: How much benefit can we get from the technical evolution of control plane in optical networks? , 2012, 2012 14th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON).

[10]  Yashar Ganjali,et al.  On scalability of software-defined networking , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  Lou Berger,et al.  The OSPF Opaque LSA Option , 1998, RFC.

[12]  Lei Liu,et al.  Experimental demonstration of OpenFlow/GMPLS interworking control plane for IP/DWDM multi-layer optical networks , 2012, 2012 14th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON).