Preference structures and negotiator behavior in electronic negotiations

Electronic Negotiation Support Systems allow users to construct a formal model of their preferences, which is then used during the negotiation process. In this paper, we analyze whether preferences embedded in such models are actually reflected in the behavior of negotiators and negotiation outcomes. Empirical results indicate that elements of negotiator behavior, like initial offers or the extent of concessions made during the negotiation, closely correspond to individual preferences. The same holds for the structure of the compromise. In contrast, the impact of negotiator preferences on reaching an agreement or the efficiency of the compromise is rather weak.

[1]  Reza Barkhi,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of Face to Face versus Computer Mediated Communication Channels , 1999 .

[2]  K. Thomas.  Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update , 1992 .

[3]  Don Coursey,et al.  Bilateral bargaining, pareto optimality, and the empirical frequency of impasse , 1982 .

[4]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  Knowledge Sharing and Negotiation Support in Multiperson Decision Support Systems , 1985, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[6]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  WWW-based negotiation support: design, implementation, and use , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[7]  T. M. Tripp,et al.  An evaluation of dependent variables in experimental negotiation studies: Impasse rates and pareto efficiency☆ , 1992 .

[8]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  Initial Perceptions in Negotiations: Evaluation and Response to 'Logrolling' Offers , 2002 .

[9]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Rational agents, contract curves, and inefficient compromises , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[10]  Margaret A. Neale,et al.  Dynamic Valuation: Preference Changes in the Context of Face-to-face Negotiation , 2004 .

[11]  Tawfik Jelassi,et al.  Negotiation support systems: an overview of design issues and existing software , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Jill M. Purdy,et al.  THE IMPACT OF COMMUNICATION MEDIA ON NEGOTIATION OUTCOMES , 2000 .

[13]  Arvind Rangaswamy,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED NEGOTIATIONS: REVIEW AND RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES , 2000 .

[14]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1997 .

[15]  R. R. Blake,et al.  The Managerial Grid , 1994 .

[16]  Arvind Rangaswamy,et al.  Using Computers to Realize Joint Gains in Negotiations: Toward an , 1997 .

[17]  B. A. Jain,et al.  The effect of task complexity and conflict handling styles on computer-supported negotiations , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Quan Zhang,et al.  Decision consolidation: criteria weight determination using multiple preference formats , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[19]  Neale,et al.  Non-linear Preference Functions and Negotiated Outcomes. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[20]  Terri R. Kurtzberg,et al.  Long and Short Routes to Success in Electronically Mediated Negotiations: Group Affiliations and Good Vibrations. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[21]  J. Wallenius,et al.  Conducting Dyadic Multiple Issue Negotiation Experiments: Methodological Recommendations , 2000 .

[22]  D. G. Pruitt.  Strategic Choice in Negotiation , 1983 .

[23]  W. C. Perkins,et al.  An empirical study of an interactive, session-oriented computerized Negotiation Support System (NSS) , 1990 .

[24]  Allen Kent,et al.  Encyclopedia of Microcomputers , 1987 .

[25]  W. C. Perkins,et al.  Can a Negotiation Support System Help a Purchasing Manager , 1996 .

[26]  Shing-Chi Cheung,et al.  Developing e-Negotiation support with a meta-modeling approach in a Web services environment , 2005, Decis. Support Syst..

[27]  Joydeep Srivastava,et al.  The role of cultural orientation in bargaining under incomplete information: Differences in causal attributions , 2005 .

[28]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[29]  Ale Smidts,et al.  The Shape of Utility Functions and Organizational Behavior , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  A Theoretical Perspective of Negotiation Support Systems , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Gregory B. Northcraft,et al.  Negotiating with Nonlinear Subjective Utilities: Why Some Concessions Are More Equal Than Others , 1995 .

[32]  J. A. Calvin.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1998 .

[33]  Rudolf Vetschera,et al.  Group decision and negotiation support — A methodological survey , 1990 .

[34]  William C. Perkins,et al.  A Comparison of Audio-Conferencing and Computer Conferencing in a Dispersed Negotiation Setting: Efficiency Matters! , 2005, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[35]  D. G. Pruitt,et al.  NEGOTIATION AND MEDIATION , 1992 .

[36]  Richard G. Milter,et al.  The effects of substantive task characteristics on negotiators' ability to reach efficient agreements , 1996 .

[37]  William C. Perkins,et al.  An empirical study of the efficacy of a computerized negotiation support system (NSS) , 1997, Decis. Support Syst..

[38]  Giampiero E. G. Beroggi.  An Experimental Investigation of Virtual Negotiations with Dynamic Plots , 2000 .

[39]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  SOCIAL MOTIVES IN NEGOTIATION: THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DYAD COMPOSITION, NEGOTIATION PROCESSES AND OUTCOMES , 2003 .

[40]  W. Bottom,et al.  Negotiator Risk: Sources of Uncertainty and the Impact of Reference Points on Negotiated Agreements. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[41]  Kathleen M. O'Connor,et al.  Tough guys finish last: the perils of a distributive reputation ☆ , 2002 .

[42]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[43]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Wise choices : decisions, games, and negotiations , 1996 .

[44]  Mark S. Silver,et al.  Decision Support Systems: Directed and Nondirected Change , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  Jeryl L. Mumpower,et al.  The judgement policies of negotiators and the structure of negotiation problems , 1991 .

[46]  Antonio Jiménez-Martín,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation techniques for group decision making with incomplete information , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[47]  T. M. Tripp,et al.  Discrepant Values and Measures of Negotiator Performance , 2000 .

[48]  L. Thompson,et al.  Face threat sensitivity in negotiation: Roadblock to agreement and joint gain , 2004 .