Clustered pixels analysis for functional MRI activation studies of the human brain

Conventional t‐statistics and cross‐correlation coefficients are commonly used for analysis of functional magnetic resonance images. The sensitivity of these statistics is usually low because severe Bonferroni‐type corrections are required for multiple statistical comparisons to minimize the false‐positive error. In the human brain, most functional areas are larger in size than a single image pixel, and coactivation of numerous contiguous pixels is expected. The probability of occurrence of clusters due to random noise is small and can be modeled. Cluster size and intensity thresholding can be used to assess statistical significance. Previous cluster analysis strategies used Gaussian models, working best with low spatial resolution images (e.g., positron emission tomography). We present a new cluster analysis model applicable to data with little or even no covariance between adjacent pixels. Computer simulations and phantom experiments were used to verify this strategy. Our new method is substantially more sensitive than both the conventional intensity‐only thresholding (IOT) method and the previous cluster method for signal change less than 6%, with maximum significant enhancement in sensitivity of 12.8 and 3.8 times, respectively. The results obtained from normal volunteers with visual stimulation further confirm the effectiveness of our new approach and show an average increase in detected activation area of 3.1 times over the IOT method and of 1.6 times over the previous cluster method using the new approach. ©1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J B Poline,et al.  Analysis of Individual Positron Emission Tomography Activation Maps by Detection of High Signal-to-Noise-Ratio Pixel Clusters , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[2]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Functional topographic mapping of the cortical ribbon in human vision with conventional MRI scanners , 1993, Nature.

[3]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  J C Gore,et al.  Functional brain imaging at 1.5 T using conventional gradient echo MR imaging techniques. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  R. Turner,et al.  Functional mapping of the human visual cortex at 4 and 1.5 tesla using deoxygenation contrast EPI , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  D Le Bihan,et al.  Activation of human primary visual cortex during visual recall: a magnetic resonance imaging study. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  M. Mintun,et al.  Enhanced Detection of Focal Brain Responses Using Intersubject Averaging and Change-Distribution Analysis of Subtracted PET Images , 1988, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[10]  A. M. Hasofer Upcrossings of Random Fields , 1978 .

[11]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  D. Noll,et al.  Functional MRI mapping of stimulus rate effects across visual processing stages , 1994 .

[13]  M E Raichle,et al.  Images of the mind: studies with modern imaging techniques. , 1994, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Relationship between Global and Local Changes in PET Scans , 1990, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[15]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[17]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Level Crossings for Random Fields , 1976 .

[18]  P. Roland,et al.  Three‐dimensional analysis of clustered voxels in 15O‐butanol brain activation images , 1993 .

[19]  D. Tank,et al.  Functional Brain Mapping Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Signal Changes Accompanying Visual Stimulation , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[20]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis for CBF Activation Studies in Human Brain , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[21]  L R Schad,et al.  Functional 2D and 3D magnetic resonance imaging of motor cortex stimulation at high spatial resolution using standard 1.5 T imager. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[22]  P T Fox,et al.  A Highly Accurate Method of Localizing Regions of Neuronal Activation in the Human Brain with Positron Emission Tomography , 1989, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[23]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. , 1988, Science.

[24]  E C Wong,et al.  Processing strategies for time‐course data sets in functional mri of the human brain , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  J. Alger,et al.  Phase‐distortion‐free in vivo surface coil proton spectroscopy , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  J. Frahm,et al.  Functional MRI of human brain activation at high spatial resolution , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.