In Search of Conversational Grain Size: Modeling Semantic Structure Using Moving Stanza Windows

Analyses of learning based on student discourse need to account not only for the content of the utterances but also for the ways in which students make connections across turns of talk. This requires segmentation of discourse data to define when connections are likely to be meaningful. In this paper, we present an approach to segmenting data for the purposes of modeling connections in discourse using epistemic network analysis. Specifically, we use epistemic network analysis to model connections in student discourse using a temporal segmentation method adapted from recent work in the learning sciences. We compare the results of this study to a purely conversation-based segmentation method to examine the affordances of temporal segmentation for modeling connections in discourse.

[1]  J. Gee.  Social Linguistics And Literacies: Ideology in Discourse , 1996 .

[2]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective , 2006 .

[3]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[4]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  Quantitative Methods for Studying Small Groups , 2013 .

[5]  Diane Ravitch.  Epistemic Network Analysis as a Tool for Engineering Design Assessment , 2015 .

[6]  S. Järvelä,et al.  Combining Individual and Group-Level Perspectives for Studying Collaborative Knowledge Construction in Context. , 2007 .

[7]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[8]  Constance C. Gerger.  Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. , 1993 .

[9]  N. Webb.  The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. , 2009, The British journal of educational psychology.

[10]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Studying Virtual Math Teams , 2010 .

[11]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Exposing Chat Features through Analysis of Uptake between Contributions , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[12]  G. Wells.  Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Socio-cultural Practice and Theory of Education , 1999 .

[13]  Marti A. Hearst.  Multi-Paragraph Segmentation Expository Text , 1994, ACL.

[14]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Visual Representation of a Multidimensional Coding Scheme for Understanding Technology-Mediated Learning about Complex Natural Systems , 2009, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[15]  M. Gernsbacher.  Cognitive processes and mechanisms in language comprehension : the structure building framework , 1991 .

[16]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[17]  Zachari Swiecki,et al.  A novel paradigm for engineering education: virtual internships with individualized mentoring and assessment of engineering thinking. , 2015, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  David Williamson Shaffer,et al.  Local Versus Global Connection Making in Discourse , 2016, ICLS.

[19]  Elizabeth Bagley,et al.  Epistemic network analysis : a Prototype for 21 st Century assessment of Learning , 2009 .

[20]  M. Brainin.  Cognition , 1999, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[21]  D. Shaffer,et al.  Epistemic Networks for Epistemic Commitments , 2014, ICLS.

[22]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[24]  David Eichelberger,et al.  Speech Genres And Other Late Essays , 2016 .

[25]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Challenging Assumptions: using sliding window visualizations to reveal time-based irregularities in CSCL processes , 2012, ICLS.

[26]  Traian Rebedea,et al.  PolyCAFe—automatic support for the polyphonic analysis of CSCL chats , 2014, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.