Choice, delay, probability, and conditioned reinforcement

[1]  R. Barnet,et al.  Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  N Squires,et al.  A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  A. Logue,et al.  Adjusting delay to reinforcement: comparing choice in pigeons and humans. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[4]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Cognition and behavior in studies of choice , 1986 .

[5]  M. Davison.  Delay of reinforcers in a concurrent-chain schedule: An extension of the hyperbolic-decay model. , 1988, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  David A. Eckerman,et al.  An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans. , 1980 .

[7]  J. E. Mazur,et al.  A comparison of delays and ratio requirements in self-control choice. , 1986, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  W. Baum,et al.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  J. E. Mazur.  Tests of an equivalence rule for fixed and variable reinforcer delays. , 1984 .

[10]  B A Williams,et al.  Preference for conditioned reinforcement. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Determinants of pigeons’ choice between certain and probabilistic outcomes , 1994 .

[12]  W M Baum,et al.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  E Fantino,et al.  Transitivity as a property of choice. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  R. Grace.  Choice between fixed and variable delays to reinforcement in the adjusting-delay procedure and concurrent chains. , 1996 .

[15]  J. E. Mazur.  Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers. , 1995, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  H. Rachlin,et al.  The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities , 1993 .

[17]  L. Green,et al.  Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. , 1995, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[18]  J. E. Mazur.  OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR THEORIES OF PROBABILISTIC REINFORCEMENT , 2005 .

[19]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  The delay-reduction hypothesis: Extension to three-alternative choice. , 1983 .

[20]  J. R. Thomas,et al.  Some factors controlling preference between fixed-ratio and variable-ratio schedules of reinforcement. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[21]  D. J. Navarick.  Choice in humans: Functional properties of reinforcers established by instruction , 1985, Behavioural Processes.

[22]  J. E. Mazur,et al.  Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers. , 1992, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[23]  M. Davison.  Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules: number of component intervals. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[24]  E Fantino,et al.  Choice: Some quantitative relations. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[25]  D. J. Navarick,et al.  Human Impulsivity and Choice: A Challenge to Traditional Operant Methodology , 1986 .

[26]  F. Tonneau,et al.  Preference between variable-ratio and fixed-ratio schedules: local and extended relations. , 1996, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[27]  M C Davison,et al.  Preference for fixed-interval schedules: an alternative model. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[28]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[29]  R. Grace.  A contextual model of concurrent-chains choice. , 1994, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[30]  U. Ben-Zion,et al.  Discount rates inferred from decisions: an experimental study , 1989 .

[31]  T. Omino.  A quantitative analysis of sensitivity to the conditioned reinforcing value of terminal-link stimuli in a concurrent-chains schedule. , 1993, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[32]  W M Baum,et al.  Choice as time allocation. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[33]  R. Cicerone,et al.  Preference for mixed versus constant delay of reinforcement. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[34]  G. Ainslie,et al.  Impulse control in pigeons. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[35]  E. Fantino,et al.  Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[36]  D Macewen,et al.  The effects of terminal-link fixed-interval and variable-interval schedules on responding under concurrent chained schedules. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[37]  R. Herrnstein.  APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[38]  G. Ainslie.  Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Choice and delay of reinforcement. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[40]  H Rachlin,et al.  Commitment, choice and self-control. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[41]  R. A. Preston,et al.  Delay reduction: current status. , 1993, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[42]  Douglas J. Navarick,et al.  Self-control and choice in humans: Effects of video game playing as a positive reinforcer , 1984 .

[43]  Devaluation of stimuli contingent on choice: evidence for conditioned reinforcement. , 1987, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[44]  E. Fantino.  Choice and rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[45]  E Fantino,et al.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[46]  P. Killeen.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[47]  Michael Domjan,et al.  Domjan and Burkhard's The principles of learning and behavior , 1993 .

[48]  J. E. Mazur.  Fixed and variable ratios and delays: further tests of an equivalence rule. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[49]  R. Grace.  Violations of transitivity: Implications for a theory of contextual choice. , 1993, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[50]  P R Killeen,et al.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[51]  L. Green,et al.  Preference reversal and self control: choice as a function of reward amount and delay , 1981 .

[52]  J. E. Mazur.  Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers. , 1986, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[53]  E. Fantino,et al.  Unification of models for choice between delayed reinforcers. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[54]  J. E. Mazur.  An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. , 1987 .

[55]  J. Gibbon.  Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .

[56]  D. Rider.  Preference for mixed versus constant delays of reinforcement: Effect of probability of the short, mixed delay. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[57]  J. E. Mazur.  Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[58]  L. Green,et al.  Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomes , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[59]  M. Davison.  Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[60]  M. Ito,et al.  Choice and delay of reinforcement: Effects of terminal-link stimulus and response conditions. , 1993, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[61]  M. Davison.  Bias and sensitivity to reinforcement in a concurrent-chain schedule. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[62]  M. Rilling,et al.  Reinforcement delay and reinforcement rate as determinants of schedule preference , 1965 .