General functional connectivity: Shared features of resting-state and task fMRI drive reliable and heritable individual differences in functional brain networks

ABSTRACT Intrinsic connectivity, measured using resting‐state fMRI, has emerged as a fundamental tool in the study of the human brain. However, due to practical limitations, many studies do not collect enough resting‐state data to generate reliable measures of intrinsic connectivity necessary for studying individual differences. Here we present general functional connectivity (GFC) as a method for leveraging shared features across resting‐state and task fMRI and demonstrate in the Human Connectome Project and the Dunedin Study that GFC offers better test‐retest reliability than intrinsic connectivity estimated from the same amount of resting‐state data alone. Furthermore, at equivalent scan lengths, GFC displayed higher estimates of heritability than resting‐state functional connectivity. We also found that predictions of cognitive ability from GFC generalized across datasets, performing as well or better than resting‐state or task data alone. Collectively, our work suggests that GFC can improve the reliability of intrinsic connectivity estimates in existing datasets and, subsequently, the opportunity to identify meaningful correlates of individual differences in behavior. Given that task and resting‐state data are often collected together, many researchers can immediately derive more reliable measures of intrinsic connectivity through the adoption of GFC rather than solely using resting‐state data. Moreover, by better capturing heritable variation in intrinsic connectivity, GFC represents a novel endophenotype with broad applications in clinical neuroscience and biomarker discovery.

[1]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Ridding fMRI data of motion-related influences: Removal of signals with distinct spatial and physical bases in multiecho data , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Tor D Wager,et al.  The relation between statistical power and inference in fMRI , 2017, PloS one.

[3]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[4]  John O. Willis,et al.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth Edition , 2014 .

[5]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Intrinsic and Task-Evoked Network Architectures of the Human Brain , 2014, Neuron.

[6]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  IMAGING GENOMICS. , 2018, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[8]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research , 2014, eLife.

[9]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[10]  K. Christoff,et al.  Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  G. Kanyongo,et al.  Reliability and Statistical Power: How Measurement Fallibility Affects Power and Required Sample Sizes for Several Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics , 2007 .

[12]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Brain Networks Are Dominated by Stable Group and Individual Factors, Not Cognitive or Daily Variation , 2018, Neuron.

[13]  M. Fox,et al.  Individual Variability in Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[14]  Gang Chen,et al.  Intraclass correlation: improved modeling approaches and applications for neuroimaging , 2017, bioRxiv.

[15]  Lloyd T. Elliott,et al.  The genetic basis of human brain structure and function: 1,262 genome-wide associations found from 3,144 GWAS of multimodal brain imaging phenotypes from 9,707 UK Biobank participants , 2017, bioRxiv.

[16]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Influences on the Test–Retest Reliability of Functional Connectivity MRI and its Relationship with Behavioral Utility , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[18]  Archana Venkataraman,et al.  Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  P. Fox,et al.  Genetic control over the resting brain , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Can brain state be manipulated to emphasize individual differences in functional connectivity? , 2017, NeuroImage.

[21]  J. Andrews-Hanna,et al.  Large-Scale Network Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-analysis of Resting-State Functional Connectivity. , 2015, JAMA psychiatry.

[22]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Heritability analysis with repeat measurements and its application to resting-state functional connectivity , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Jolynn Pek,et al.  Profile Likelihood-Based Confidence Intervals and Regions for Structural Equation Models , 2015, Psychometrika.

[24]  B T Thomas Yeo,et al.  Reconfigurable task-dependent functional coupling modes cluster around a core functional architecture , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior , 2013, NeuroImage.

[26]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[27]  T. Yarkoni,et al.  Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning , 2017, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[28]  Ahmad R. Hariri,et al.  A Connectome-wide Functional Signature of Transdiagnostic Risk for Mental Illness , 2018, Biological Psychiatry.

[29]  Richie Poulton,et al.  The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study: overview of the first 40 years, with an eye to the future , 2015, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[30]  G. Jackson,et al.  Effect of prior cognitive state on resting state networks measured with functional connectivity , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[31]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  A manifesto for reproducible science , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[32]  M. Fox,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[33]  B. T. Thomas Yeo,et al.  Inference in the age of big data: Future perspectives on neuroscience , 2017, NeuroImage.

[34]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science , 2015, Science.

[35]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  The ENIGMA Consortium: large-scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and genetic data , 2014, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[37]  Benjamin S Aribisala,et al.  Novel genetic loci associated with hippocampal volume , 2017, Nature Communications.

[38]  A. Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  Intermediate phenotypes and genetic mechanisms of psychiatric disorders , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  L. Shah,et al.  Reliability and reproducibility of individual differences in functional connectivity acquired during task and resting state , 2016, Brain and behavior.

[40]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Potential pitfalls when denoising resting state fMRI data using nuisance regression , 2017, NeuroImage.

[41]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[42]  R. Cameron Craddock,et al.  Individual differences in functional connectivity during naturalistic viewing conditions , 2016, NeuroImage.

[43]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Modeling resting-state functional networks when the cortex falls asleep: local and global changes. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  John Fox,et al.  OpenMx: An Open Source Extended Structural Equation Modeling Framework , 2011, Psychometrika.

[45]  S. Kühn,et al.  What goes on in the resting-state? A qualitative glimpse into resting-state experience in the scanner , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[46]  Benjamin S Aribisala,et al.  Novel genetic loci underlying human intracranial volume identified through genome-wide association , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  D. Cicchetti Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. , 1994 .

[48]  H. Laufs,et al.  Decoding Wakefulness Levels from Typical fMRI Resting-State Data Reveals Reliable Drifts between Wakefulness and Sleep , 2014, Neuron.

[49]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Task-free MRI predicts individual differences in brain activity during task performance , 2016, Science.

[50]  J. Raven STANDARDIZATION OF PROGRESSIVE MATRICES, 1938 , 1941 .

[51]  R. Whelan,et al.  When Optimism Hurts: Inflated Predictions in Psychiatric Neuroimaging , 2014, Biological Psychiatry.

[52]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Sources and implications of whole-brain fMRI signals in humans , 2017, NeuroImage.

[53]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Evidence for Hubs in Human Functional Brain Networks , 2013, Neuron.

[54]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[55]  P. Elliott,et al.  UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age , 2015, PLoS medicine.

[56]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[57]  F. Collins,et al.  The path to personalized medicine. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[58]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Task-induced brain state manipulation improves prediction of individual traits , 2018, Nature Communications.

[59]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Variable Global Dysconnectivity and Individual Differences in Schizophrenia , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[60]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain , 2015, Neuron.

[61]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  One-year test–retest reliability of intrinsic connectivity network fMRI in older adults , 2012, NeuroImage.

[62]  H. Pashler,et al.  Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition 1 , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[63]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  An improved framework for confound regression and filtering for control of motion artifact in the preprocessing of resting-state functional connectivity data , 2013, NeuroImage.

[64]  Hang Joon Jo,et al.  Effective Preprocessing Procedures Virtually Eliminate Distance-Dependent Motion Artifacts in Resting State FMRI , 2013, J. Appl. Math..

[65]  Rodrigo M. Braga,et al.  Parallel Interdigitated Distributed Networks within the Individual Estimated by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity , 2017, Neuron.

[66]  Carl D. Hacker,et al.  Resting state network estimation in individual subjects , 2013, NeuroImage.

[67]  Cheng Luo,et al.  Dysfunction of Large-Scale Brain Networks in Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Resting-State Functional Connectivity , 2018, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[68]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  Anti-correlated networks, global signal regression, and the effects of caffeine in resting-state functional MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[69]  R. Malach,et al.  Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision , 2004, Science.

[70]  M. Mesulam,et al.  From sensation to cognition. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[71]  Danilo Bzdok,et al.  Formal Models of the Network Co-occurrence Underlying Mental Operations , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[72]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[73]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Replication validity of genetic association studies , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[74]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains , 2017, Neuron.

[75]  Vincent Schmithorst,et al.  Quantification of head motion in children during various fMRI language tasks , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[76]  R. Buckner,et al.  Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[77]  J. Ioannidis Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated , 2008, Epidemiology.

[78]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[79]  F Alfaro Almagro The genetic basis of human brain structure and function: 1,262 genome-wide associations found from 3,144 GWAS of multimodal brain imaging phenotypes from 9,707 UK Biobank participants , 2017 .

[80]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[81]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[82]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  The Healthy Brain Network Serial Scanning Initiative: a resource for evaluating inter-individual differences and their reliabilities across scan conditions and sessions , 2016, bioRxiv.

[83]  M. Greicius Resting-state functional connectivity in neuropsychiatric disorders , 2008, Current opinion in neurology.

[84]  B. Biswal,et al.  The resting brain: unconstrained yet reliable. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[85]  César Caballero-Gaudes,et al.  Methods for cleaning the BOLD fMRI signal , 2016, NeuroImage.

[86]  M E Meyerand,et al.  Combining independent component analysis and correlation analysis to probe interregional connectivity in fMRI task activation datasets. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[87]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Naturalistic fMRI Mapping Reveals Superior Temporal Sulcus as the Hub for the Distributed Brain Network for Social Perception , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[88]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Towards a consensus regarding global signal regression for resting state functional connectivity MRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[89]  Rodrigo M. Braga,et al.  Echoes of the Brain within the Posterior Cingulate Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[90]  O Sporns,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[91]  Dorret I. Boomsma,et al.  A Note on the Statistical Power in Extended Twin Designs , 2000, Behavior genetics.

[92]  J. H. Steiger Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[93]  Arno Klein,et al.  Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[94]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[95]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[96]  Peter Kochunov,et al.  Comparison of heritability estimates on resting state fMRI connectivity phenotypes using the ENIGMA analysis pipeline , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[97]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature , 2017, PLoS biology.

[98]  Vivek Prabhakaran,et al.  The effect of resting condition on resting-state fMRI reliability and consistency: A comparison between resting with eyes open, closed, and fixated , 2013, NeuroImage.

[99]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Using connectome-based predictive modeling to predict individual behavior from brain connectivity , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[100]  D. Yurgelun-Todd,et al.  Reproducibility of Single-Subject Functional Connectivity Measurements , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[101]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Supplementary Information for Natural Speech Reveals the Semantic Maps That Tile Human Cerebral Cortex , 2022 .

[102]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[103]  Linda Geerligs,et al.  State and Trait Components of Functional Connectivity: Individual Differences Vary with Mental State , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[104]  D. W. Zimmerman,et al.  Statistical Power Analysis and Reliability of Measurement , 1989 .

[105]  Anderson M. Winkler,et al.  Cortical thickness or grey matter volume? The importance of selecting the phenotype for imaging genetics studies , 2010, NeuroImage.

[106]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Common genetic variants influence human subcortical brain structures , 2015, Nature.

[107]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  A method for using blocked and event-related fMRI data to study “resting state” functional connectivity , 2007, NeuroImage.

[108]  P. Matthews,et al.  Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[109]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[110]  J. Ioannidis Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[111]  T D Satterthwaite,et al.  Dimensional depression severity in women with major depression and post-traumatic stress disorder correlates with fronto-amygdalar hypoconnectivty , 2016, Molecular Psychiatry.

[112]  Timothy R. Brick,et al.  OpenMx 2.0: Extended Structural Equation and Statistical Modeling , 2015, Psychometrika.

[113]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites , 2018, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[114]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[115]  Mary E. Meyerand,et al.  The effect of scan length on the reliability of resting-state fMRI connectivity estimates , 2013, NeuroImage.

[116]  G. Northoff,et al.  Discovering imaging endophenotypes for major depression , 2011, Molecular Psychiatry.

[117]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[118]  J. Nunnally Introduction to Psychological Measurement , 1970 .

[119]  Paola Galdi,et al.  Resting-State Functional Brain Connectivity Best Predicts the Personality Dimension of Openness to Experience , 2018, Personality Neuroscience.

[120]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[121]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Neuroimaging Measures as Endophenotypes in Alzheimer's Disease , 2011, International journal of Alzheimer's disease.

[122]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Personalized Neuroscience: Common and Individual-Specific Features in Functional Brain Networks , 2018, Neuron.

[123]  Viviana Betti,et al.  Natural Scenes Viewing Alters the Dynamics of Functional Connectivity in the Human Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[124]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[125]  D. Heeger,et al.  Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[126]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic Fluctuations within Cortical Systems Account for Intertrial Variability in Human Behavior , 2007, Neuron.

[127]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  Identification of common variants associated with human hippocampal and intracranial volumes , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[128]  Fenna M. Krienen,et al.  Opportunities and limitations of intrinsic functional connectivity MRI , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[129]  Ahmad R. Hariri,et al.  A Neural Biomarker of Psychological Vulnerability to Future Life Stress , 2015, Neuron.

[130]  F. Collins,et al.  A new initiative on precision medicine. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[131]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Evaluation of Denoising Strategies to Address Motion-Correlated Artifacts in Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data from the Human Connectome Project , 2016, Brain Connect..