Monitoring the performance of an alternative cover using caisson lysimeters

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) office in Grand Junction, Colorado, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, collaborated on a series of field lysimeter studies to design and monitor the performance of an alternative cover for a uranium mill tailings disposal cell at the Monticello, Utah, Superfund Site. Because groundwater recharge is naturally limited at Monticello in areas with thick loess soils, DOE and EPA chose to design a cover for Monticello using local soils and a native plant community to mimic this natural soilwater balance. Two large drainage lysimeters fabricated of corrugated steel culvert lined with high-density polyethylene were installed to evaluate the hydrological and ecological performance of an alternative cover design constructed in 2000 on the disposal cell. Unlike conventional, lowpermeability designs, this cover relies on (1) the water storage capacity of a 163-cm soil “sponge” layer overlying a sand-and-gravel capillary barrier to retain precipitation while plants are dormant and (2) native vegetation to remove precipitation during the growing season. The sponge layer consists of a clay loam subsoil compacted to 1.65 g/cm2 in one lysimeter and a loam topsoil compacted to 1.45 g/cm2 in the other lysimeter, representing the range of as-built conditions constructedmore » in the nearby disposal cell cover. About 0.1 mm of drainage occurred in both lysimeters during an average precipitation year and before they were planted, an amount well below the EPA target of <3.0 mm/yr. However, the cover with less compacted loam topsoil sponge had a 40% greater water storage capacity than the cover with overly compacted clay loam subsoil sponge. The difference is attributable in part to higher green leaf area and water extraction by plants in the loam topsoil. The lesson learned is that seemingly subtle differences in soil types, sources, and compaction can result in salient differences in performance. Diverse, seeded communities of predominantly native perennial species were established on both lysimeters during an extended 3-yr drought, highlighting the importance of a sound understanding of the local ecology and of implementing the science and methods of disturbed-land revegetation.« less

[1]  B. J. Drennon,et al.  A water balance study of two landfill cover designs for semiarid regions. , 1990 .

[2]  C. T. Wit Photosynthesis of leaf canopies , 1965 .

[3]  D. E. Daniel,et al.  Field Performance of Compacted Clay Liners , 1999 .

[4]  Glenn W. Suter,et al.  Compacted Soil Barriers at Abandoned Landfill Sites are Likely to Fail in the Long Term , 1993 .

[5]  James H Clarke,et al.  Engineered containment and control systems: nurturing nature. , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  John C. Stormont,et al.  Method to Estimate Water Storage Capacity of Capillary Barriers , 1998 .

[7]  G. W. Gee,et al.  In-situ remediation: Scientific basis for current and future technologies. Part 2 , 1994 .

[8]  G. Gee,et al.  Particle-size Analysis , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[9]  Gregory M. Smith,et al.  Protective layer design in landfill covers based on frost penetration , 2002 .

[10]  P. Jarvis,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – PREDICTING EFFECTS OF VEGETATION CHANGES ON TRANSPIRATION AND EVAPORATION , 1983 .

[11]  Archaeology and public perception of a trans-scientific problem; disposal of toxic wastes in the unsaturated zone , 1986 .

[12]  W. J. Waugh,et al.  MONTICELLO FIELD LYSIMETRY: DESIGN AND MONITORING OF AN ALTERNATIVE COVER , 2002 .

[13]  I C Edmundson,et al.  Particle size analysis , 2013 .

[14]  Daniel Hillel,et al.  Groundwater recharge in arid regions: Review and critique of estimation methods , 1988 .

[15]  C. B. Hunt Cenozoic geology of the Colorado Plateau , 1956 .

[16]  S. O. Link,et al.  The role of plants on isolation barrier systems , 1994 .

[17]  J. E. Anderson,et al.  A new point interception frame for estimating cover of vegetation , 2004, Vegetatio.

[18]  L. L. Cadwell,et al.  Plant Cover and Water Balance in Gravel Admixtures at an Arid Waste‐Burial Site , 1994 .

[19]  Craig H. Benson,et al.  Capillary Barriers: Design Variables and Water Balance , 2000 .

[20]  S. O. Link,et al.  Soil Water Balance Changes in Engineered Soil Surfaces , 1995 .

[21]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  Predicting rainfall erosion losses : a guide to conservation planning , 1978 .

[22]  Anderson L. Ward,et al.  Performance Evaluation of a Field‐Scale Surface Barrier , 1997 .

[23]  L. W. Stoesz,et al.  Deserts as Dumps? The Disposal of Hazardous Materials in Arid Ecosystems , 1993 .

[24]  R. Nowak,et al.  Managing Soil Moisture on Waste Burial Sites in Arid Regions , 1993 .