Mixture Interpretation: Defining the Relevant Features for Guidelines for the Assessment of Mixed DNA Profiles in Forensic Casework *

Abstract:  Currently in the United States there is little direction for what constitutes sufficient guidelines for DNA mixture interpretation. While a standardized approach is not possible or desirable, more definition is necessary to ensure reliable interpretation of results is carried out. In addition, qualified DNA examiners should be able to review reports and understand the assumptions made by the analyst who performed the interpretation. Interpretation of DNA mixture profiles requires consideration of a number of aspects of a mixed profile, many of which need to be established by on‐site, internal validation studies conducted by a laboratory’s technical staff, prior to performing casework analysis. The relevant features include: criteria for identification of mixed specimens, establishing detection and interpretation threshold values, defining allele peaks, defining nonallele peaks, identifying artifacts, consideration of tri‐allelic patterns, estimating the minimum number of contributors, resolving components of a mixture, determining when a portion of the mixed profile can be treated as a single source profile, consideration of potential additive effects of allele sharing, impact of stutter peaks on interpretation in the presence of a minor contributor, comparison with reference specimens, and some issues related to the application of mixture calculation statistics. Equally important is using sensible judgment based on sound and documented principles of DNA analyses. Assumptions should be documented so that reliable descriptive information is conveyed adequately concerning that mixture and what were the bases for the interpretations that were carried out. Examples are provided to guide the community. Interpretation guidelines also should incorporate strategies to minimize potential bias that could occur by making inferences based on a reference sample. The intent of this paper is to promote more thought, provide assistance on many aspects for consideration, and to support that more formalized mixture interpretation guidelines are developed.

[1]  B. Devlin Forensic inference from genetic markers , 1993, Statistical methods in medical research.

[2]  B Budowle,et al.  Validation of STR typing by capillary electrophoresis. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  Benjamin E. Krenke,et al.  Validation of a male-specific, 12-locus fluorescent short tandem repeat (STR) multiplex. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[4]  B Budowle,et al.  Fixed-bin analysis for statistical evaluation of continuous distributions of allelic data from VNTR loci, for use in forensic comparisons. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  M. Steinlechner,et al.  Rare failures in the amelogenin sex test , 2002, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[6]  W R Mayr,et al.  DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[7]  B Budowle,et al.  Validation of short tandem repeats (STRs) for forensic usage: performance testing of fluorescent multiplex STR systems and analysis of authentic and simulated forensic samples. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  B. Brinkmann Is the amelogenin sex test valid? , 2002, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[9]  L. Singh,et al.  Is the amelogenin gene reliable for gender identification in forensic casework and prenatal diagnosis? , 2002, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[10]  P. Walsh,et al.  TWGDAM validation of the AmpFISTR blue PCR amplification kit for forensic casework analysis. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[11]  Statistical and Population Genetics Issues Affecting the Evaluation of the Frequency of Occurrence of DNA Profiles Calculated From Pertinent Population Database , 2000 .

[12]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  Validation of male-specific, 12-locus fluorescent short tandem repeat (STR) multiplex. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[13]  P. Walsh,et al.  Sequence analysis and characterization of stutter products at the tetranucleotide repeat locus vWA. , 1996, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  Ranajit Chakraborty,et al.  Interpreting DNA evidence , 2000 .

[15]  P. Walsh,et al.  TWGDAM validation of AmpFlSTR PCR amplification kits for forensic DNA casework. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[16]  Peter Gill,et al.  National recommendations of the Technical UK DNA working group on mixture interpretation for the NDNAD and for court going purposes. , 2008, Forensic science international. Genetics.