Flexible Operation of an IGCC Plant Coproducing Power and H2 with CO2 Capture through Novel PSA-based Process Configurations☆

Abstract The coproduction of power and H2 in an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plant with CO2 capture demonstrated to entail interesting potentials in terms of flexible operations. The possibility to shift between the two energy products allows operating the plant in a load-following mode, where the reduction in net power output is counterbalanced by an increased H2 throughput. Within this framework, pressure swing adsorption (PSA) as gas separation technology showed to offer advantages in comparison to the common process layout involving an absorption process for capturing CO2. Two novel PSA-based process configurations are presented in this sense (i.e. Two-train PSA and One-train PSA) and their performance reported. The objective of this paper is to investigate the degree of flexibility achievable by the two novel process configurations. Some limitations arose in the capability of the One-train PSA process configuration to meet the ultrapure H2 specifications (99.99+% vol. purity) in the different cases tested. The flexibility can be realized if more relaxed purity specifications apply. Process simulations of the Two-train PSA process configuration demonstrated the plant capability to significantly reduce its load (about 31% reduction), while processing a constant coal feed. At the different plant loads tested, the H2 specifications were met and the plant efficiency was only slightly decreasing, thus the flexibility was realized. The simulation of similar loads reduction in a reference IGCC plant for power generation with CO2 capture, showed a more significant decrease in efficiency, confirming the effectiveness of the novel process configuration proposed.

[1]  Rosa Domenichini,et al.  Operating Flexibility of Power Plants with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) , 2013 .

[2]  M. Mølnvik,et al.  Dynamis CO2 quality recommendations , 2008 .

[3]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Pressure swing adsorption for coproduction of power and ultrapure H2 in an IGCC plant with CO2 capture , 2016 .

[4]  Luca Mancuso,et al.  Co-production of hydrogen and electricity with CO2 capture , 2009 .

[5]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Evaluating Pressure Swing Adsorption as a CO2 separation technique in coal-fired power plants , 2015 .

[6]  C. Cormos.  Assessment of hydrogen and electricity co-production schemes based on gasification process with carbon capture and storage , 2009 .

[7]  María Ortiz Navarro,et al.  Hydrogen production with CO2 capture by coupling steam reforming of methane and chemical-looping combustion: Use of a iron-based waste product as oxygen carrier burning a PSA tail gas , 2010 .

[8]  Robert H. Williams,et al.  Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: Performance and emissions , 2005 .

[9]  E. J. Anthony,et al.  Carbon capture and storage update , 2014 .

[10]  Ashok Rao,et al.  Performance and costs of advanced sustainable central power plants with CCS and H2 co-production , 2012 .

[11]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Comprehensive analysis on the performance of an IGCC plant with a PSA process integrated for CO2 capture , 2015 .

[12]  Anne Sjoerd Brouwer,et al.  The flexibility requirements for power plants with CCS in a future energy system with a large share of intermittent renewable energy sources , 2013 .

[13]  Magnus Korpås,et al.  Identifying Operational Requirements for Flexible CCS Power Plant in Future Energy Systems , 2016 .