Small Circles: Mobile Telephony and the Cultivation of the Private Sphere

This article examines how we use mobile telephony to maintain our physically and socially closest social circle. The analysis is based on traffic data gathered from Norway using approximately 24 million calls and texts made by private individuals. Previous research has shown that our temporal and spatial movement is highly predictable and that the majority of calls and text messages are sent to only four to six different persons. This article extends this research by examining both tie strength and the distance between the interlocutors in urban and rural settings. The findings show that even as information and communication technologies (ICTs) potentially put the world at our fingertips, the mobile phone is an instrument of a more limited geographical and social sphere. Approximately two-thirds of our calls/texts go to strong ties that are within a 25-km radius.

[1]  Enrique Frías-Martínez,et al.  User Modeling for Telecommunication Applications: Experiences and Practical Implications , 2010, UMAP.

[2]  Rich Ling,et al.  Measuring Mobile Phone Use: Self-Report Versus Log Data , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  Jeffrey Boase,et al.  No Such Effect? The Implications of Measurement Error in Self-Report Measures of Mobile Communication Use , 2012 .

[4]  Tasuku Igarashi,et al.  Gender differences in social network development via mobile phone text messages: A longitudinal study , 2005 .

[5]  Valerie Frissen ICTs in the Rush Hour of Life , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[6]  Richard Ling,et al.  Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway , 2002 .

[7]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[8]  Torsten Hägerstrand Aspects of the spatial structure of social communication and the diffusion of information , 1966 .

[9]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  EXPLAINING COMMUNICATION DISPLACEMENT AND LARGE-SCALE SOCIAL CHANGE IN CORE NETWORKS , 2013 .

[10]  R. Tolman,et al.  The Geography of Need: Spatial Distribution of Barriers to Employment in Metropolitan Detroit , 2003 .

[11]  Troels Fibæk Bertel “It’s like I trust it so much that I don’t really check where it is I’m going before I leave”: Informational uses of smartphones among Danish youth , 2013 .

[12]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Did distance matter before the Internet?: Interpersonal contact and support in the 1970s , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[13]  C. Rodriguez-Sickert,et al.  The dynamics of a mobile phone network , 2007, 0712.4031.

[14]  Igor Sádaba Mobilities , 2009 .

[15]  David Lazer,et al.  Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Ran Wei,et al.  Staying connected while on the move , 2006, New Media Soc..

[17]  Richard Ling,et al.  Taken for Grantedness: The Embedding of Mobile Communication into Society , 2012 .

[18]  Randi Johanne Hjorthol,et al.  Same city—different options: An analysis of the work trips of married couples in the metropolitan area of Oslo , 2000 .

[19]  R. Lynd,et al.  Middletown : a study in American culture , 1956 .

[20]  A-L Barabási,et al.  Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Rich Ling,et al.  The Activation of Core Social Networks in the Wake of the 22 July Oslo Bombing , 2012, 2012 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.

[22]  C. Licoppe,et al.  From voice to text : continuity and change in the use of mobile phones in France and Japan , 2005 .

[23]  A. Odlyzko The History of Communications and its Implications for the Internet , 2000 .

[24]  Scott W. Campbell,et al.  Mobile Communication and Civic Life: Linking Patterns of Use to Civic and Political Engagement , 2010 .

[25]  H. Geser :New Tech, New Ties: How Mobile Communication Is Reshaping Social Cohesion , 2009 .

[26]  Kajsa Ellegård,et al.  Home as a pocket of local order: everyday activities and the friction of distance , 2004 .

[27]  Christian Licoppe,et al.  ‘Connected’ Presence: The Emergence of a New Repertoire for Managing Social Relationships in a Changing Communication Technoscape , 2004 .

[28]  H. Gans The Levittowners: Ways of Life and Politics in a New Suburban Community , 1967 .

[29]  Adriana de Souza e Silva,et al.  Location-aware mobile media and urban sociability , 2011, New Media Soc..

[30]  Gerd Kortuem,et al.  Smart objects as building blocks for the Internet of things , 2010, IEEE Internet Computing.

[31]  Peter M. Blau,et al.  Presidential Address: Parameters of Social Structure , 1974 .

[32]  Rich Ling,et al.  The socio-demographics of texting: An analysis of traffic data , 2012, New Media Soc..

[33]  C. Fischer,et al.  To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. , 1984 .

[34]  James J. Flink,et al.  The Automobile Age , 1988 .

[35]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Brothers' Keepers: Situating Kinship Relations in Broader Networks of Social Support , 1989 .

[36]  P. Berger,et al.  Marriage and the Construction of Reality , 1964 .

[37]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  `Making Moosic': The Development of Personal Relationships on Line and a Comparison to their Off-Line Counterparts , 1998 .

[38]  Zbigniew Smoreda,et al.  Delineating Geographical Regions with Networks of Human Interactions in an Extensive Set of Countries , 2013, PloS one.

[39]  Martin Dijst,et al.  Face-to-face and electronic communications in maintaining social networks: the influence of geographical and relational distance and of information content , 2010, New Media Soc..

[40]  Zbigniew Smoreda,et al.  Interplay between Telecommunications and Face-to-Face Interactions: A Study Using Mobile Phone Data , 2011, PloS one.

[41]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[42]  R. Collins,et al.  Interaction Ritual Chains , 2004 .

[43]  Keith Roe,et al.  Measuring mobile phone use: Gender, age and real usage level in relation to the accuracy and validity of self-reported mobile phone use , 2013 .