Hybrid coronary computed tomography angiography and positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in evaluation of recurrent symptoms after coronary artery bypass grafting.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Seferovic,et al. [2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)]. , 2019, Giornale italiano di cardiologia.
[2] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography With Selective PET Perfusion Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[3] Dante Chiappino,et al. Multicentre multi-device hybrid imaging study of coronary artery disease: results from the EValuation of INtegrated Cardiac Imaging for the Detection and Characterization of Ischaemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) hybrid imaging population. , 2016, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.
[4] A. Lammertsma,et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in the detection of significant coronary artery disease: cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative [(15)O]H2O PET imaging. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[5] S. Achenbach,et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.
[6] J. Ishii,et al. A combination of anatomical and functional evaluations improves the prediction of cardiac event in patients with coronary artery bypass , 2013, BMJ Open.
[7] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2013, European heart journal.
[8] V. Chair,et al. ACCF/AHA Practice Guideline 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2011 .
[9] B. Chow,et al. Prognostic value of CT angiography in coronary bypass patients. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[10] Volkmar Falk,et al. Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (esc) and the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (eacts) Developed with the Special Contribution of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular I , 2022 .
[11] H. Sipilä,et al. Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Accurately Detects Anatomically and Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Disease , 2010, Circulation.
[12] K. Oldroyd,et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[13] W. B. Meijboom,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography in patients after bypass grafting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[14] Mathias Prokop,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[15] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. , 2008, European heart journal.
[16] Hatem Alkadhi,et al. Validation of a new cardiac image fusion software for three-dimensional integration of myocardial perfusion SPECT and stand-alone 64-slice CT angiography , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[17] J. Ornato,et al. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). , 2004, Circulation.
[18] R. Kornowski,et al. Discrepancy between myocardial ischemia and luminal stenosis in patients with left internal mammary artery grafting to left anterior descending coronary artery , 2003, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
[19] R. Gibbons,et al. Prognostic value of exercise thallium-201 imaging performed within 2 years of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[20] M. Lauer,et al. Prediction of death and myocardial infarction by screening with exercise-thallium testing after coronary-artery-bypass grafting , 1998, The Lancet.
[21] W. Rogers,et al. Recurrence of angina after coronary artery bypass surgery: predictors and prognosis (CASS Registry). Coronary Artery Surgery Study. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[22] D. Berman,et al. Incremental prognostic value of exercise thallium-201 myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography late after coronary artery bypass surgery. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[23] R. Frye,et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.
[24] B. Gersh,et al. ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease — addenda The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology , 2013 .