Hybrid coronary computed tomography angiography and positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in evaluation of recurrent symptoms after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Aims Recurrent chest pain after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) poses a diagnostic challenge. We hypothesized that combining anatomy of bypass grafts and native coronary arteries with ischaemia detection by hybrid imaging could be used to gain valuable and complementary information in patients with recurrent symptoms after CABG. Methods and results We analysed 36 consecutive patients (67 ± 9 years, 81% male) who had undergone hybrid imaging using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging due to recurrent symptoms after CABG. Coronary tree and left ventricular myocardium were divided into three main territories, yielding a total of 108 coronary territories in 36 patients. The presence of obstructive (≥50%) stenosis and the patency of grafts were evaluated by CCTA, while myocardial ischaemia was assessed by quantitative adenosine-stress PET. Altogether 28 (78%) of the 36 study patients presented with matched PET/CCTA abnormalities. Forty-one coronary territories were supplied by non-obstructed bypass grafts or native coronary arteries (protected territory). However, 12 (29%) of these presented with a perfusion defect. In six cases, the perfusion defect involved myocardium distal to the graft-coronary anastomosis, as interpreted on the PET/CCTA fusion images. In turn, in 48 coronary territories the supplying artery was obstructed on CCTA (unprotected territory). Of these, 41 (85%, P < 0.001 vs. protected) presented with abnormal perfusion, involving myocardium distal to the anastomosis in 29 cases. Conclusion Hybrid imaging provides complementary information on the presence and localization of atherosclerotic lesions and myocardial perfusion abnormalities in symptomatic patients with previous CABG.

[1]  P. Seferovic,et al.  [2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)]. , 2019, Giornale italiano di cardiologia.

[2]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography With Selective PET Perfusion Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[3]  Dante Chiappino,et al.  Multicentre multi-device hybrid imaging study of coronary artery disease: results from the EValuation of INtegrated Cardiac Imaging for the Detection and Characterization of Ischaemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) hybrid imaging population. , 2016, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[4]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in the detection of significant coronary artery disease: cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative [(15)O]H2O PET imaging. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  S. Achenbach,et al.  SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[6]  J. Ishii,et al.  A combination of anatomical and functional evaluations improves the prediction of cardiac event in patients with coronary artery bypass , 2013, BMJ Open.

[7]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2013, European heart journal.

[8]  V. Chair,et al.  ACCF/AHA Practice Guideline 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2011 .

[9]  B. Chow,et al.  Prognostic value of CT angiography in coronary bypass patients. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[10]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (esc) and the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (eacts) Developed with the Special Contribution of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular I , 2022 .

[11]  H. Sipilä,et al.  Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Accurately Detects Anatomically and Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Disease , 2010, Circulation.

[12]  K. Oldroyd,et al.  Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  W. B. Meijboom,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography in patients after bypass grafting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[14]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. , 2008, European heart journal.

[16]  Hatem Alkadhi,et al.  Validation of a new cardiac image fusion software for three-dimensional integration of myocardial perfusion SPECT and stand-alone 64-slice CT angiography , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[17]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). , 2004, Circulation.

[18]  R. Kornowski,et al.  Discrepancy between myocardial ischemia and luminal stenosis in patients with left internal mammary artery grafting to left anterior descending coronary artery , 2003, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[19]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Prognostic value of exercise thallium-201 imaging performed within 2 years of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  M. Lauer,et al.  Prediction of death and myocardial infarction by screening with exercise-thallium testing after coronary-artery-bypass grafting , 1998, The Lancet.

[21]  W. Rogers,et al.  Recurrence of angina after coronary artery bypass surgery: predictors and prognosis (CASS Registry). Coronary Artery Surgery Study. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  D. Berman,et al.  Incremental prognostic value of exercise thallium-201 myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography late after coronary artery bypass surgery. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  R. Frye,et al.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.

[24]  B. Gersh,et al.  ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease — addenda The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology , 2013 .