Networking Capability, Network Structure, and New Product Development Performance

Considering the strategic effects of networking relationships on firm performance, it is important to understand how networking capability drives and exerts its impact on network structural relationships, which in turn affect new product development (NPD) performance. Grounded on dynamic capability view of the firm, we theorized that networking capability fosters NPD and plays a significant role in developing and affecting network structural relationships on NPD performance. We disaggregate networking capability into network partner finding capability and network managing capability. We tested our theoretical predictions, and the findings offer novel insights into the ability of firms in building network structural relationships that enable the firms to successfully develop and commercialize new products. We find that strong ties and bridge ties positively affect NPD performance only when firms have adequate networking capability (managing). Also, we illustrate that strong ties and bridge ties, respectively, mediate the positive relationship between networking capability (finding) and NPD performance. In addition, the findings demonstrate that the synergy of strong ties and bridge ties has highest impact on NPD performance when networking capability (managing) is high. This study, thus, suggests that networking capability and network structure need to be simultaneously considered and integrated to better account for performance.

[1]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[2]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Origin of Alliance Portfolios: Entrepreneurs, Network Strategies, and Firm Performance , 2009 .

[3]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[4]  Antonio Capaldo.  Network Structure and Innovation: The Leveraging of a Dual Network as a Distinctive Relational Capability , 2006 .

[5]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Controlling Supplier Opportunism in Industrial Relationships , 1996 .

[6]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[7]  C. Moorman,et al.  Marketing Alliances, Firm Networks, and Firm Value Creation , 2009 .

[8]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[9]  Hans Georg Gemünden,et al.  Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents , 2003 .

[10]  Oliver Schilke,et al.  Alliance Management Capability: An Investigation of the Construct and Its Measurement , 2010 .

[11]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  ALLIANCES IN INDUSTRIAL PURCHASING - THE DETERMINANTS OF JOINT ACTION IN BUYER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS , 1990 .

[12]  B. Kogut.  The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[13]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[14]  M. Parry,et al.  The Determinants of Japanese New Product Successes , 1997 .

[15]  Marcia J. Simmering,et al.  A Tale of Three Perspectives , 2009 .

[16]  Sebastian Forkmann,et al.  Networking capability in business relationships - Concept and scale development , 2012 .

[17]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[18]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[19]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work. , 1990 .

[20]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: the role of the alliance function , 2002 .

[21]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[22]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[23]  Thomas L. Powers,et al.  Factors influencing successful buyer–seller relationships , 2007 .

[24]  Bo Edvardsson,et al.  Initiation of business relationships in service-dominant settings , 2008 .

[25]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[26]  S. Cavusgil,et al.  Alliance orientation: Conceptualization, measurement, and impact on market performance , 2006 .

[27]  Christian Homburg,et al.  How Organizational Complaint Handling Drives Customer Loyalty: An Analysis of the Mechanistic and the Organic Approach , 2005 .

[28]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[29]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Bringing the Context Back In: Settings and the Search for Syndicate Partners in Venture Capital Investment Networks , 2008 .

[30]  Thomas Ritter,et al.  Organizational relationship termination competence: A conceptualization and an empirical test , 2011 .

[31]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  Benchmarking Marketing Capabilities for Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 2005 .

[32]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[34]  Andrew V. Shipilov,et al.  DANCING WITH STRANGERS: ASPIRATION PERFORMANCE AND THE SEARCH FOR UNDERWRITING SYNDICATE PARTNERS. , 2004 .

[35]  A. Tiwana.  Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity , 2008 .

[36]  G. O'Connor,et al.  Alliance Portfolio Resource Diversity and Firm Innovation , 2012 .

[37]  Rajendra K. Srivastava,et al.  The Integrated Networks Model: Explaining Resource Allocations in Network Markets , 2003 .

[38]  R. Gulati.  Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[39]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Catalyzing Strategies and Efficient Tie Formation: How Entrepreneurial Firms Obtain Investment Ties , 2012 .

[40]  N. Azad,et al.  The customer relationship management process: its measurement and impact on performance , 2015 .

[41]  Jonas Schreyögg,et al.  The Impact of Network Ties and Resource Input on Research Performance: An Empirical Investigation Among Surgeons in Academic Medical Centers , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[42]  Jifeng Mu,et al.  Technology Adoption in Online Social Networks , 2011 .

[43]  Håkan Håkansson,et al.  Industrial technological development : a network approach , 1987 .

[44]  Christopher J. Medlin,et al.  Ending-competence in business closure , 2012 .

[45]  Benjamin L. Hallen.  The Causes and Consequences of the Initial Network Positions of New Organizations: From Whom Do Entrepreneurs Receive Investments? , 2008 .

[46]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[47]  Jifeng Mu,et al.  Networking Capability and New Product Development , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[48]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Relationship Governance in a Supply Chain Network , 2004 .

[49]  R. Gulati.  Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[50]  C. Moorman,et al.  The Acquisition and Utilization of Information in New Product Alliances: A Strength-of-Ties Perspective , 2001 .

[51]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[52]  Melanie Schreiner,et al.  What really is alliance management capability and how does it impact alliance outcomes and success , 2009 .

[53]  Gang Peng,et al.  Network Structures and Online Technology Adoption , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[54]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[55]  F. Dwyer,et al.  An Examination of Organizational Factors Influencing New Product Success in Internal and Alliance-Based Processes , 2000 .

[56]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[57]  M. Hitt,et al.  Partner Selection in Emerging and Developed Market Contexts: Resource-Based and Organizational Learning Perspectives , 2000 .

[58]  Anoop Madhok,et al.  Process Capabilities and Value Generation in Alliance Portfolios , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[59]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[60]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Network Evolution: The Origins of Structural Holes , 2009 .

[61]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[62]  Thomas Ritter,et al.  The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance , 2006 .

[63]  David Obstfeld.  Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[64]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.