Potential effects of landscape change on water supplies in the presence of reservoir storage

This work presents a set of methods to evaluate the potential effects of landscape changes on water supplies. Potential impacts are a function of the seasonality of precipitation, losses of water to evapotranspiration and deep recharge, the flow-regulating ability of watersheds, and the availability of reservoir storage. For a given reservoir capacity, simple reservoir simulations with daily precipitation and streamflow enable the determination of the maximum steady supply of water for both the existing watershed and a hypothetical counter-factual that has neither flow-regulating benefits nor any losses. These two supply values, representing land use end-members, create an envelope that defines the water-supply service and bounds the effect of landscape change on water supply. These bounds can be used to discriminate between water supplies that may be vulnerable to landscape change and those that are unlikely to be affected. Two indices of the water-supply service exhibit substantial variability across 593 watersheds in the continental United States. Rcross, the reservoir capacity at which landscape change is unlikely to have any detrimental effect on water supply has an interquartile range of 0.14–4% of mean-annual-streamflow. Steep, forested watersheds with seasonal climates tend to have greater service values, and the indices of water-supply service are positively correlated with runoff ratios during the months with lowest flows.

[1]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale , 2001 .

[2]  L. Corominas,et al.  Analysis of the uncertainty in the monetary valuation of ecosystem services--A case study at the river basin scale. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  R. Stallard,et al.  Effect of land cover and use on dry season river runoff, runoff efficiency, and peak storm runoff in the seasonal tropics of Central Panama , 2013 .

[4]  Lars Hein,et al.  Towards ecosystem accounting: a comprehensive approach to modelling multiple hydrological ecosystem services , 2015 .

[5]  Xing Ma,et al.  Response of hydrological processes to land‐cover and climate changes in Kejie watershed, south‐west China , 2009 .

[6]  L. Bruijnzeel,et al.  Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees? , 2004 .

[7]  J. Welker,et al.  The role of topography on catchment‐scale water residence time , 2005 .

[8]  Andrew W. Western,et al.  A review of paired catchment studies for determining changes in water yield resulting from alterations in vegetation , 2005 .

[9]  D. Scott,et al.  Streamflow responses to afforestation with Eucalyptus grandis and Pinus patula and to felling in the Mokobulaan experimental catchments, South Africa , 1997 .

[10]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Substantial proportion of global streamflow less than three months old , 2016 .

[11]  J. Dracup,et al.  On the definition of droughts , 1980 .

[12]  Kate A Brauman,et al.  Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  I. Gordon,et al.  Water Ecosystem Services: A Global Perspective , 2015 .

[14]  K. Anderson.  Existing Supply of Watershed Services in the Panama Canal Watershed , 2007, Emerging Markets for Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Panama Canal Watershed.

[15]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  Estimation of Continental Precipitation Recycling. , 1993 .

[16]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  On the relationships between catchment scale and streamwater mean residence time , 2003 .

[17]  Richard M. Vogel,et al.  Storage Reservoir Behavior in the United States , 1999 .

[18]  K. Price.  Effects of watershed topography, soils, land use, and climate on baseflow hydrology in humid regions: A review , 2011 .

[19]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  How much information do managers need? The sensitivity of ecosystem service decisions to model complexity , 2011 .

[20]  E. Youngs.  Horizontal seepage through unconfined aquifers with non-uniform hydraulic conductivity , 1966 .

[21]  Casey Brown,et al.  Estimating hydrologic alteration from basin characteristics in Massachusetts , 2013 .

[22]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[23]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Vazken Andréassian,et al.  Waters and forests: from historical controversy to scientific debate [review article] , 2004 .

[25]  D. Ellison,et al.  On the forest cover–water yield debate: from demand- to supply-side thinking , 2012, Global Change Biology.

[26]  Darius J. Semmens,et al.  A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation , 2013 .

[27]  V. Smakhtin.  Low flow hydrology: a review , 2001 .

[28]  J. Hewlett,et al.  A REVIEW OF CATCHMENT EXPERIMENTS TO DETERMINE THE EFFECT OF VEGETATION CHANGES ON WATER YIELD AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION , 1982 .

[29]  J. Gat,et al.  Recycling of water in the Amazon Basin: An isotopic study , 1979 .

[30]  Rebecca Logsdon Muenich,et al.  Comparing two tools for ecosystem service assessments regarding water resources decisions. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[31]  Charles G. Markham.  SEASONALITY OF PRECIPITATION IN THE UNITED STATES , 1970 .

[32]  Gary W. Johnson,et al.  A Methodology for Adaptable and Robust Ecosystem Services Assessment , 2014, PloS one.

[33]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver , 2009 .

[34]  Olivier Hagolle,et al.  Impact of climate and land cover changes on snow cover in a small Pyrenean catchment , 2015 .

[35]  Kari L Vigerstol,et al.  A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  P. Hamel,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis of a Spatially Explicit Annual Water-Balance Model: Case Study of the Cape Fear Basin, North Carolina , 2015 .

[37]  Andrew W. Western,et al.  Impact of forest cover changes on annual streamflow and flow duration curves , 2013 .

[38]  Murray C. Peel,et al.  Revisiting reservoir storage–yield relationships using a global streamflow database , 2007 .

[39]  Martyn P. Clark,et al.  Development of a large-sample watershed-scale hydrometeorological data set for the contiguous USA: data set characteristics and assessment of regional variability in hydrologic model performance , 2014 .

[40]  Heather Tallis,et al.  Impact of climate extremes on hydrological ecosystem services in a heavily humanized Mediterranean basin , 2014 .

[41]  G. Daily,et al.  The Nature and Value of Ecosystem Services: An Overview Highlighting Hydrologic Services , 2007 .

[42]  Camille Roux,et al.  Payments for Water Ecosystem Services in Latin America: A literature review and conceptual model , 2013 .

[43]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Soil Water Balance and Ecosystem Response to Climate Change , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[44]  Peter A. Troch,et al.  Recent tree die‐off has little effect on streamflow in contrast to expected increases from historical studies , 2015 .

[45]  Casey Brown,et al.  Ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities for hydrologic modeling to support decision making , 2014 .

[46]  Fred D. Tillman,et al.  Regional scale estimates of baseflow and factors influencing baseflow in the Upper Colorado River Basin , 2015 .

[47]  Irena F. Creed,et al.  A framework for broad‐scale classification of hydrologic response units on the Boreal Plain: is topography the last thing to consider? , 2005 .

[48]  David G. Tarboton,et al.  An overview of current applications, challenges, and future trends in distributed process-based models in hydrology , 2016 .

[49]  Fernando Veiga,et al.  One size does not fit all: Natural infrastructure investments within the Latin American Water Funds Partnership , 2016 .

[50]  N. Barros,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Reservoir Water Surfaces: A New Global Synthesis. , 2016, Bioscience.

[51]  R. Yin,et al.  The implementation and impacts of China's largest payment for ecosystem services program as revealed by longitudinal household data , 2014 .

[52]  A. J. Parker,et al.  Effects of watershed land use and geomorphology on stream low flows during severe drought conditions in the southern Blue Ridge Mountains, Georgia and North Carolina, United States , 2011 .

[53]  B. McGlynn,et al.  Hierarchical controls on runoff generation: Topographically driven hydrologic connectivity, geology, and vegetation , 2011 .

[54]  Bingfang Wu,et al.  Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital , 2016, Science.