Stomatal responses to humidity in selected conifers.

Stomatal response to changes in leaf-to-air water vapor pressure difference (D) was studied in needles of the current year's shoot of three-year-old seedlings of Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr., Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud., Larix x eurolepis Henry, and Pinus sylvestris L. Both eight-week- and ten-month-old shoots of P. sylvestris were studied. Stomata of all the species responded by closing to some degree as D was increased over the range 0.4-2.0 kPa. Ten-month-old shoots of P. sylvestris showed the smallest reduction (7.5%), and shoots of P. sitchensis the largest reduction (64.6%) in stomatal conductance. However, in no species was stomatal closure sufficient to cause a reduction in transpiration (E) as D increased. Net photosynthesis (A) declined linearly as D was increased and as a result the ratio of E/A increased linearly in all species. Only the stomata of P. contorta and L. x eurolepis behaved in an 'optimal' way, i.e., estimated values of dEdA were approximately constant as D increased. For P. sylvestris, shoots of both ages, dE/dA increased markedly with D, whereas in P. sitchensis it declined. Explanation of these data does not require a mechanism of stomatal closure involving a site that senses the vapor pressure deficit outside the leaf. However, it is unlikely that a simple 'feedback' response involving bulk leaf water potential can explain the responses measured because changes in needle water potential were less than 0.1 MPa during an experiment.

[1]  K. Shackel,et al.  In Situ Measurement of Epidermal Cell Turgor, Leaf Water Potential, and Gas Exchange in Tradescantia virginiana L. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[2]  W. Davies,et al.  Mechanisms for Leaf Control of Gas Exchange , 1985 .

[3]  John Roberts,et al.  Forest transpiration: A conservative hydrological process? , 1983 .

[4]  U. Maier-Maercker.  The role of peristomatal transpiration in the mechanism of stomatal movement , 1983 .

[5]  W. E. Williams.  Optimal water‐use efficiency in a California shrub , 1983 .

[6]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of light on stomata. I. In Scots pine and Sitka spruce , 1983 .

[7]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  A portable system for measuring carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange of leaves , 1982 .

[8]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves , 1981, Planta.

[9]  J. Leverenz.  Photosynthesis and transpiration in large forest-grown Douglas-fir: interactions with apical control , 1981 .

[10]  E. Schulze,et al.  Environmental control of CO2-assimilation and leaf conductance in Larix decidua Mill. , 1981, Oecologia.

[11]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Photosynthesis as related to xylem water potential and carbon dioxide concentration in Sitka spruce , 1981 .

[12]  J. Leverenz.  Photosynthesis and transpiration in large forest-grown Douglas-fir: diurnal variation , 1981 .

[13]  A. E. Hall,et al.  Stomatal response to environment and a possible interrelation between stomatal effects on transpiration and CO2 assimilation , 1980 .

[14]  M. Tyree,et al.  The site of water evaporation from sub-stomatal cavities, liquid path resistances and hydroactive stomatal closure. , 1980 .

[15]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Hysteresis in the response of stomatal conductance in Pinus sylvestris L. needles to light: observations and a hypothesis. , 1980 .

[16]  S. Running.  Environmental and physiological control of water flux through Pinus contorta , 1980 .

[17]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Photosynthesis in Sitka Spruce. VIII. The Effects of Light Flux Density and Direction on the Rate of Net Photosynthesis and the Stomatal Conductance of Needles , 1979 .

[18]  D. W. Sheriff.  Stomatal aperture and the sensing of the environment by guard cells , 1979 .

[19]  J. Roberts.  The Use of the ‘Tree Cutting’ Technique in the Study of the Water Relations of Norway Spruce, Picea abies (L.) Karst , 1978 .

[20]  D. W. Sheriff.  The Effect of Humidity on Water Uptake by, and Viscous Flow Resistance of, Excised Leaves of a Number of Species: Physiological and Anatomical Observations , 1977 .

[21]  T. Black,et al.  Characteristics of stomatal diffusion resistance in a Douglas fir forest exposed to soil water deficits , 1977 .

[22]  J. Landsberg.  Some Useful Equations for Biological Studies , 1977, Experimental Agriculture.

[23]  I. Calder.  A model of transpiration and interception loss from a spruce forest in Plynlimon, central Wales , 1977 .

[24]  T. Black,et al.  Factors affecting the canopy resistance of a Douglas-fir forest , 1976 .

[25]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Photosynthesis in Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong,) Carr.): VII. Measurements of Stomatal Conductance and 14 CO 2 Uptake in a Forest Canopy , 1976 .

[26]  H. Meidner.  Water Vapour Loss from a Physical Model of a Substomatal Cavity , 1976 .

[27]  N. Fetcher.  PATTERNS OF LEAF RESISTANCE TO LODGEPOLE PINE TRANSPIRATION IN WYOMING , 1976 .

[28]  S. Running.  Environmental control of leaf water conductance in conifers , 1976 .

[29]  P. G. Jarvis,et al.  Photosynthesis in Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.): VI. Response of Stomata to Temperature , 1975 .

[30]  J. Grace,et al.  The Effect of Wind and Humidity on Leaf Diffusive Resistance in Sitka Spruce Seedlings , 1975 .

[31]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Photosynthesis in Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis) (Bong.) Carr.). I. General Characteristics , 1971 .

[32]  J. Stewart,et al.  Preliminary Study of Dependence of Surface Conductance of Thetford Forest on Environmental Conditions , 1985 .

[33]  Neil C. Turner,et al.  Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress , 1980 .

[34]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  Responses to Humidity by Stomata of Nicotiana glauca L. And Corylus avellana L. Are Consistent With the Optimization of Carbon Dioxide Uptake With Respect to Water Loss , 1980 .

[35]  D. Sen,et al.  Structure, function and ecology of stomata , 1979 .

[36]  P. A. P. Ng.  Response of stomata to environmental variables in Pinus sylvestris L. , 1978 .

[37]  G. Farquhar.  Feedforward Responses of Stomata to Humidity , 1978 .

[38]  D. Rook,et al.  Stomatal and Mesophyll Resistances in Two Clones of Pinus radiata D.don Known to Differ in Transpiration and Survival Rate , 1978 .

[39]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  INTEGRATION OF ACTIVITY IN THE HIGHER PLANT , 1977 .

[40]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  Regulation of Water Loss by Citrus Leaves , 1975 .

[41]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Plant photosynthetic production. Manual of methods. , 1971 .