The simulation of energy, water vapor and carbon dioxide fluxes over common crops by the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS)

Abstract The performance of the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS) was evaluated against observed eddy covariance flux data from four commonly cultivated crops growing in different climatic conditions. Of the four crops examined, wheat and soybean are C 3 plants, whereas maize and millet are C 4 plants. Physiological modules to simulate photosynthesis, respiration and growth for C 4 plants were added to CLASS. Apart from maximum photosynthesis capacity, and root and soil respiration rates at reference temperatures, most model parameters were kept constant for each crop. The diurnal and seasonal cycles of simulated energy, water vapor and carbon dioxide fluxes were similar to the measurements made during the growing seasons for each of the four crops. Simulated values of canopy conductance were in agreement with observations. The model was able to explain 84, 76, 84 and 58% of the variance in the half-hourly net ecosystem productivity values for the maize, soybean, wheat and millet crops, respectively. Similarly, 77, 76, 77 and 78% of the variance in observed half-hourly evaporative fluxes was accounted for by the model for the maize, soybean, wheat and millet crops, respectively. We conclude that despite the process-based physics of the model, it is still critical to correctly specify detailed model parameters such as maximum carboxylation rate V cmax , plant and soil carbon pools and temperature sensitivity coefficients to obtain close agreement between simulated and observed fluxes. Increasing the complexity of the model physics further necessitates the accurate specification of additional model parameters depending on the intended use of the model. The enhanced version of CLASS when coupled to Canadian global and regional climate models or when used as a stand-alone component can potentially be a valuable tool to evaluate the impact of climate change on the growth and health of terrestrial ecosystems.

[1]  J. Norman,et al.  Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over a grassland , 2000 .

[2]  Arana,et al.  Progress in Photosynthesis Research , 1987, Springer Netherlands.

[3]  Stan D. Wullschleger,et al.  Biochemical Limitations to Carbon Assimilation in C3 Plants—A Retrospective Analysis of the A/Ci Curves from 109 Species , 1993 .

[4]  S. Verma,et al.  Inversion of net ecosystem CO2 flux measurements for estimation of canopy PAR absorption , 2002 .

[5]  D. Verseghy,et al.  Performance of the Canadian land surface scheme at temperate aspen‐birch and mixed forests, and a boreal young jack pine forest: Tests involving canopy conductance parametrizations , 2000 .

[6]  C. Delire,et al.  Evaluating the performance of a land Surface / ecosystem model with biophysical measurements from contrasting environments , 1999 .

[7]  Paul G. Jarvis,et al.  Description and validation of an array model - MAESTRO. , 1990 .

[8]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Modeling CO2 and water vapor exchange of a temperate broadleaved forest across hourly to decadal time scales , 2001 .

[9]  D. Verseghy,et al.  Class—A Canadian land surface scheme for GCMS. I. Soil model , 2007 .

[10]  J.-P. Goutorbe,et al.  HAPEX-Sahel: a large-scale study of land-atmosphere interactions in the semi-arid tropics , 1994 .

[11]  A. Pitman The evolution of, and revolution in, land surface schemes designed for climate models , 2003 .

[12]  D. Verseghy,et al.  CLASS-A Canadian Land Surface Scheme for GCMs , 1993 .

[13]  Ann Henderson-Sellers,et al.  The Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS): Phases 2 and 3 , 1995 .

[14]  D. Verseghy,et al.  A test of the Canadian land surface scheme (class) for a variety of wetland types , 2000 .

[15]  J. Moncrieff,et al.  CO2 fluxes at leaf and canopy scale in millet, fallow and tiger bush vegetation at the HAPEX-Sahel southern super-site. , 1997 .

[16]  D. Verseghy,et al.  Validation of the Canadian land surface scheme (class) for a subarctic open woodland , 2000 .

[17]  W. Oechel,et al.  Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites , 2002 .

[18]  G. Collatz,et al.  Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants , 1992 .

[19]  D. Verseghy,et al.  The Canadian land surface scheme (CLASS): Its history and future , 2000 .

[20]  Gordon B. Bonan,et al.  Atmosphere-biosphere exchange of carbon dioxide in boreal forests , 1991 .

[21]  K. Halsnæs,et al.  Climate change research. Danish contributions , 2001 .

[22]  A. Verhoef,et al.  Spatial and temporal variations in net carbon flux during HAPEX-Sahel. , 1997 .

[23]  R. Betts,et al.  Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model , 2000, Nature.

[24]  D. S. Munro,et al.  Measuring and modelling the seasonal climatic regime of a temperate wooded wetland , 2000 .

[25]  Nina Buchmann,et al.  Net CO2 and H2O fluxes of terrestrial ecosystems , 1999 .

[26]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Nitrogen Controls on Climate Model Evapotranspiration , 2002 .

[27]  D. Verseghy,et al.  Comparing the performance of the Canadian land surface scheme @class) for two subarctic terrain types , 2000 .

[28]  J. D. Bowers,et al.  Application of the Canadian land surface scheme to a full canopy crop during a drying cycle , 2000 .

[29]  J. Amthor,et al.  The role of maintenance respiration in plant growth , 1984 .

[30]  E. Schulze,et al.  Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, conductance and transpiration : scaling from leaves to canopies , 1995 .

[31]  E. Boegh,et al.  Carbon dioxide assimilation in Danish crops (wheat and maize) and its dependency on increasing temperature and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration , 2001 .

[32]  S W Pacala,et al.  Contributions of land-use history to carbon accumulation in U.S. forests. , 2000, Science.

[33]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  photosynthesis--nitrogen relationship in wild plants , 1986 .

[34]  R. Betts,et al.  The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation of climate and climate sensitivity , 1999 .

[35]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[36]  J. Lloyd,et al.  On the temperature dependence of soil respiration , 1994 .

[37]  J. D. Bowers,et al.  Application of the Canadian land surface scheme (class) to the simulation of energy and water fluxes over alpine tundra , 2000 .

[38]  Vivek K. Arora,et al.  Simulating energy and carbon fluxes over winter wheat using coupled land surface and terrestrial ecosystem models , 2003 .

[39]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange , 2001 .

[40]  Houghton,et al.  The U.S. Carbon budget: contributions from land-Use change , 1999, Science.

[41]  R. Leuning,et al.  A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy I:: Model description and comparison with a multi-layered model , 1998 .

[42]  A. Weaver,et al.  The Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis global coupled model and its climate , 2000 .

[43]  Shusen Wang,et al.  Modelling plant carbon and nitrogen dynamics of a boreal aspen forest in CLASS — the Canadian Land Surface Scheme , 2001 .

[44]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Annual carbon cost of autotrophic respiration in boreal forest ecosystems in relation to species and climate , 1997 .

[45]  T. A. Black,et al.  A comparison of parametrizations of canopy conductance of aspen and Douglas‐fir forests for class , 2000 .

[46]  T. A. Black,et al.  Sensitivity and uncertainty of the carbon balance of a Pacific Northwest Douglas-fir forest during an El Niño/La Niña cycle , 2004 .

[47]  T. A. Black,et al.  Effects of seasonal and interannual climate variability on net ecosystem productivity of boreal deciduous and conifer forests , 2002 .

[48]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Shortwave radiation budget of Sahelian vegetation: 1. Techniques of measurement and results during HAPEX-Sahel , 1996 .

[49]  E. Boegh,et al.  Carbon dioxide flux, transpiration and light response of millet in the Sahel , 1997 .

[50]  P. Jarvis,et al.  An Analytical Model for Field Measurement of Photosynthesis , 1976 .

[51]  Ray Leuning,et al.  A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy. II. Comparison with measurements , 1998 .

[52]  Jan Polcher,et al.  A Proposed Structure for Coupling Tiled Surfaces with the Planetary Boundary Layer , 2004 .

[53]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  On using eco-physiological, micrometeorological and biogeochemical theory to evaluate carbon dioxide, water vapor and trace gas fluxes over vegetation: a perspective , 1998 .

[54]  W. Oechel,et al.  FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities , 2001 .

[55]  D. Baldocchi Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future , 2003 .

[56]  D. Baldocchi A comparative study of mass and energy exchange rates over a closed C3 (wheat) and an open C4 (corn) crop: II. CO2 exchange and water use efficiency , 1994 .

[57]  F. Bunnell,et al.  Microbial respiration and substrate weight loss—I , 1977 .

[58]  I. E. Woodrow,et al.  A Model Predicting Stomatal Conductance and its Contribution to the Control of Photosynthesis under Different Environmental Conditions , 1987 .

[59]  Peter D. Blanken,et al.  Energy balance and canopy conductance of a boreal aspen forest: Partitioning overstory and understory components , 1997 .

[60]  J. Monteith,et al.  Agricultural Meteorology: evolution and application , 2000 .