Signaling pathways have an inherent need for noise to acquire information

Background All living systems acquire information about their environment. At the cellular level, they do so through signaling pathways. Such pathways rely on reversible binding interactions between molecules that detect and transmit the presence of an extracellular cue or signal to the cell’s interior. These interactions are inherently stochastic and thus noisy. On the one hand, noise can cause a signaling pathway to produce the same response for different stimuli, which reduces the amount of information a pathway acquires. On the other hand, in processes such as stochastic resonance, noise can improve the detection of weak stimuli and thus the acquisition of information. It is not clear whether the kinetic parameters that determine a pathway’s operation cause noise to reduce or increase the acquisition of information. Results We analyze how the kinetic properties of the reversible binding interactions used by signaling pathways affect the relationship between noise, the response to a signal, and information acquisition. Our results show that, under a wide range of biologically sensible parameter values, a noisy dynamic of reversible binding interactions is necessary to produce distinct responses to different stimuli. As a consequence, noise is indispensable for the acquisition of information in signaling pathways. Conclusions Our observations go beyond previous work by showing that noise plays a positive role in signaling pathways, demonstrating that noise is essential when such pathways acquire information.

[1]  Brian Munsky,et al.  Transcription Factors Modulate c-Fos Transcriptional Bursts , 2014, Cell reports.

[2]  Signaling by nuclear receptors. , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[3]  C. Furusawa,et al.  Theory of robustness of irreversible differentiation in a stem cell system: chaos hypothesis. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  L. Aravind,et al.  Interplay between gene expression noise and regulatory network architecture. , 2012, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[5]  A. Wagner,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity can facilitate adaptive evolution in gene regulatory circuits , 2011, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[6]  J. Stamatoyannopoulos,et al.  The role of chromatin accessibility in directing the widespread, overlapping patterns of Drosophila transcription factor binding , 2011, Genome Biology.

[7]  N. Stocks,et al.  Suprathreshold stochastic resonance in multilevel threshold systems , 2000, Physical review letters.

[8]  O. Rissland,et al.  Determining mRNA half-lives on a transcriptome-wide scale. , 2017, Methods.

[9]  J. Corzo Time, the forgotten dimension of ligand binding teaching , 2006, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[10]  Gašper Tkačik,et al.  Noise and information transmission in promoters with multiple internal States. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[11]  C Jayaprakash,et al.  The role of dimerization in noise reduction of simple genetic networks. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  Carla Bosia,et al.  The Role of Incoherent MicroRNA-Mediated Feedforward Loops in Noise Buffering , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  James B. Brown,et al.  DNA regions bound at low occupancy by transcription factors do not drive patterned reporter gene expression in Drosophila , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Daniel B. Forger,et al.  Stochastic simulation of the mammalian circadian clock. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  J. Hillston,et al.  Stochastic properties of the plant circadian clock , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[16]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[17]  O. Berg,et al.  Quantification of transcription factor-DNA binding affinity in a living cell , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  Johannes Berg,et al.  What makes the lac-pathway switch: identifying the fluctuations that trigger phenotype switching in gene regulatory systems , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  T. Kepler,et al.  Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[20]  P. R. ten Wolde,et al.  Fundamental Limits to Cellular Sensing , 2015, 1505.06577.

[21]  J. Starrfelt,et al.  Bet‐hedging—a triple trade‐off between means, variances and correlations , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[22]  M. Selbach,et al.  Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control , 2011, Nature.

[23]  L. Tsimring,et al.  Accurate information transmission through dynamic biochemical signaling networks , 2014, Science.

[24]  Sarah A Teichmann,et al.  Duel of the fates: the role of transcriptional circuits and noise in CD4+ cells. , 2012, Current opinion in cell biology.

[25]  Jeroen S. van Zon,et al.  Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration , 2009, Nature.

[26]  Alexei A. Sharov,et al.  Database for mRNA Half-Life of 19 977 Genes Obtained by DNA Microarray Analysis of Pluripotent and Differentiating Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells , 2008, DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes.

[27]  Eric J. Deeds,et al.  Fundamental trade-offs between information flow in single cells and cellular populations , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Guillermo Rodrigo,et al.  Insights about collective decision-making at the genetic level , 2019, Biophysical Reviews.

[29]  W. Bialek,et al.  Information flow and optimization in transcriptional regulation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Richard W. Lusk,et al.  Evolutionary Mirages: Selection on Binding Site Composition Creates the Illusion of Conserved Grammars in Drosophila Enhancers , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[31]  Albert Goldbeter,et al.  Modeling-Based Investigation of the Effect of Noise in Cellular Systems , 2018, Front. Mol. Biosci..

[32]  J. McNally,et al.  Quantifying transcription factor kinetics: At work or at play? , 2013, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[33]  G. Vinnicombe,et al.  Fundamental limits on the suppression of molecular fluctuations , 2010, Nature.

[34]  U. Rant,et al.  Polymerase/DNA interactions and enzymatic activity: multi-parameter analysis with electro-switchable biosurfaces , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Clive G. Bowsher,et al.  Environmental sensing, information transfer, and cellular decision-making. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[36]  A. Wagner,et al.  Short Residence Times of DNA-Bound Transcription Factors Can Reduce Gene Expression Noise and Increase the Transmission of Information in a Gene Regulation System , 2020, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.

[37]  Anastasia Baryshnikova,et al.  Unification of Protein Abundance Datasets Yields a Quantitative Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteome. , 2018, Cell systems.

[38]  Jerome T. Mettetal,et al.  Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[39]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  The application of information theory to biochemical signaling systems , 2012, Physical biology.

[40]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells , 2008, Nature.

[41]  Ursula Kummer,et al.  Information transfer in signaling pathways: A study using coupled simulated and experimental data , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[42]  L. Cantley Signal transduction : principles, pathways, and processes , 2014 .

[43]  Mads Kærn,et al.  A chance at survival: gene expression noise and phenotypic diversification strategies , 2009, Molecular microbiology.

[44]  Derek Abbott,et al.  What Is Stochastic Resonance? Definitions, Misconceptions, Debates, and Its Relevance to Biology , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[45]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Stochastic resonance and sensory information processing: a tutorial and review of application , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[46]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Single molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization (smFISH) of C. elegans worms and embryos. , 2012, WormBook : the online review of C. elegans biology.

[47]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[48]  Juan F. Poyatos,et al.  Genetic Redundancies Enhance Information Transfer in Noisy Regulatory Circuits , 2016, bioRxiv.

[49]  Nicholas A. DeLateur,et al.  Stochastic Turing patterns in a synthetic bacterial population , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells. , 1998, Genetics.

[51]  Naama Barkai,et al.  The design of transcription-factor binding sites is affected by combinatorial regulation , 2005, Genome Biology.

[52]  John M. McNamara,et al.  Information is a fitness enhancing resource , 2010 .

[53]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic amplification and signaling in enzymatic futile cycles through noise-induced bistability with oscillations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  Martin Falcke,et al.  Reliable Encoding of Stimulus Intensities Within Random Sequences of Intracellular Ca2+ Spikes , 2014, Science Signaling.

[55]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The fitness value of information , 2005, Oikos.

[56]  L. Serrano,et al.  Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation , 2000, Nature.

[57]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits , 2010, Nature.

[58]  H. Westerhoff,et al.  Recurrent design patterns in the feedback regulation of the mammalian signalling network , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[59]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Noise Minimization in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, PLoS biology.

[60]  Shinya Kuroda,et al.  Robustness and Compensation of Information Transmission of Signaling Pathways , 2013, Science.

[61]  M. Hetzer,et al.  Protein homeostasis: live long, won't prosper , 2012, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[62]  Ryan A. Kellogg,et al.  Noise Facilitates Transcriptional Control under Dynamic Inputs , 2015, Cell.

[63]  I. Nemenman,et al.  Information Transduction Capacity of Noisy Biochemical Signaling Networks , 2011, Science.

[64]  Peter S. Swain,et al.  The Fidelity of Dynamic Signaling by Noisy Biomolecular Networks , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[65]  A. Vazquez,et al.  Cell population heterogeneity driven by stochastic partition and growth optimality , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[66]  L. Tsimring Noise in biology , 2014, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[67]  H. Putzer,et al.  Initiation of mRNA decay in bacteria , 2013, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[68]  M. Thattai,et al.  Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[69]  Alfonso Martinez Arias,et al.  Filtering transcriptional noise during development: concepts and mechanisms , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[70]  W. Bialek,et al.  Physical limits to biochemical signaling. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[71]  M. Biggin Animal transcription networks as highly connected, quantitative continua. , 2011, Developmental cell.

[72]  C. Rao,et al.  Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise , 2002, Nature.