Parasitoid‐plant mutualism: parasitoid attack of herbivore increases plant reproduction

We tested whether a plant's life time seed production is increased by parasitization of herbivores in a tritrophic system, Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) plants, Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) caterpillars and the solitary endoparasitoid Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). We established seed production for intact A. thaliana plants, plants that were mechanically damaged, plants fed upon by parasitized caterpillars and plants fed upon by unparasitized caterpillars. In the first experiment, with ecotype Landsberg (erecta mutant), herbivory by unparasitized P. rapae caterpillars resulted in a strongly reduced seed production compared to undamaged plants. In contrast, damage by P. rapae caterpillars that had been parasitized by C. rubecula did not result in a significant reduction in seed production. For the second experiment with the ecotype Columbia, the results were identical. Plants damaged by unparasitized caterpillars only produced seeds on regrown shoots. Seed production of plants that had been mechanically damaged was statistically similar to that of undamaged plants. Production of the first ripe siliques by plants fed upon by unparasitized caterpillars was delayed by 18–22 days for Landsberg and 9–10 days for Columbia. We conclude that parasitization of P. rapae by C. rubecula potentially confers a considerable fitness benefit for A. thaliana plants when compared to plants exposed to feeding damage by unparasitized P. rapae larvae. Plants that attract parasitoids and parasitoids that respond to herbivore‐induced plant volatiles will both experience selective advantage, justifying the use of the term mutualism for this parasitoid‐plant interaction. This type of mutualism is undoubtedly very common in nature.

[1]  E. Menges,et al.  SEED SET AND SEED PREDATION IN PEDICULARIS FURBISHIAE, A RARE ENDEMIC OF THE ST. JOHN RIVER, MAINE , 1986 .

[2]  T. A. Beek,et al.  Comparative headspace analysis of cabbage plants damaged by two species of Pieris caterpillars: consequences for in‐flight host location by Cotesia parasitoids , 1994 .

[3]  F. Guillot,et al.  Effect of parasitism by Cardiochiles nigriceps on food consumption and utilization by Heliothis virescens , 1973 .

[4]  Regino Zamora,et al.  Top‐Down Effects in a Tritrophic System: Parasitoids Enhance Plant Fitness , 1994 .

[5]  C. Cloutier,et al.  The effect of superparasitism by Aphidius smithi (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) on the food budget of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Homoptera: Aphididae) , 1979 .

[6]  J. Rosenthal,et al.  Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  M. Crawley,et al.  The establishment of seedlings from primary and regrowth seeds of ragwort (Senecio jacobaea). , 1985 .

[8]  M. Dicke,et al.  Long-distance assessment of patch profitability through volatile infochemicals by the parasitoids Cotesia glomerata and C. rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). , 1998 .

[9]  M. Dicke,et al.  Volatiles from damaged plants as major cues in long‐range host‐searching by the specialist parasitoid Cotesia rubecula , 1994 .

[10]  G. Dively,et al.  Effects of Depodding and Defoliation on the Yield and Quality of Lima Beans , 1980 .

[11]  I. Baldwin.  Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Fenner,et al.  Parasitism of the herbivore Pieris brassicae L. (Lep., Pieridae) by Cotesia glomerata L. (Hym., Braconidae) does not benefit the host plant by reduction of herbivory , 1999 .

[13]  L. Kaiser,et al.  In‐flight orientation to volatiles from the plant‐host complex in Cotesia rubecula (Hym.: Braconidae): increased sensitivity through olfactory experience , 1992 .

[14]  J. Harper.  Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[15]  Louise E. M. Vet,et al.  Plant-carnivore interactions: evolutionary and ecological consequences for plant, herbivore and carnivore , 1999 .

[16]  Bruce A. McPheron,et al.  Interactions Among Three Trophic Levels: Influence of Plants on Interactions Between Insect Herbivores and Natural Enemies , 1980 .

[17]  Maurice W. Sabelis,et al.  Infochemical terminology: based on cost-benefit analysis rather than origin of compounds? , 1988 .

[18]  John H. Loughrin,et al.  How caterpillar-damaged plants protect themselves by attracting parasitic wasps. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  T. C. Turlings,et al.  Attraction of parasitic wasps by caterpillar-damaged plants. , 1999, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[20]  S. D. Hendrix.  Herbivory and its Impact on Plant Reporduction , 1988 .

[21]  J. Loon,et al.  Insect-plant biology: from physiology to evolution. , 1998 .

[22]  M. Dicke.  Local and Systemic Production of Volatile Herbivore-induced Terpenoids: Their Role in Plant-carnivore Mutualism , 1994 .

[23]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Herbivory simulations in ecological research. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  J. Powell.  Food Consumption by Tobacco Budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Larvae Reduced After Parasitization by Microplitis demolitor or M. croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) , 1989 .

[25]  F. Slansky.  Utilization of Energy and Nitrogen by Larvae of the Imported Cabbageworm, Pieris rapae , as Affected by Parasitism by Apanteles glomeratus , 1978 .

[26]  Lonnie W. Aarssen,et al.  The effect of genetically based differences in seed size on seedling survival in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) , 1991 .

[27]  V. Nealis,et al.  Responses to host kairomones and foraging behavior of the insect parasite Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) , 1986 .

[28]  L. Veterans,et al.  Ecology Of Infochemical Use By Natural Enemies In A Tritrophic Context , 1992 .

[29]  Mustafizur M. Rahman,et al.  Effect of Parasitism on Food Consumption of Pieris rapae Larvae , 1970 .

[30]  J. Harvey,et al.  Development of the parasitoid, Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Pieris rapae and Pieris brassicae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae): evidence for host regulation. , 1999, Journal of insect physiology.

[31]  J. Trumble,et al.  Plant compensation for arthropod herbivory , 1993 .

[32]  G. Rédei.  Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. A review of the genetics and biology. , 1970 .

[33]  R. Crookston,et al.  Early Defoliation Affects Corn Grain Yields1 , 1978 .

[34]  C. Preston,et al.  The eco-physiological complexity of plant responses to insect herbivores , 1999, Planta.

[35]  E. King,et al.  Effects of Parasitism by a Tachinid, Lixophaga diatraeae on Growth and Food Consumption of Sugarcane Borer Larvae , 1978 .

[36]  E. S. Brown,et al.  The relation between simulated armyworm damage and crop-loss in maize and sorghum , 1972 .

[37]  Louise E. M. Vet,et al.  Learning to discriminate between infochemicals from different plant‐host complexes by the parasitoids Cotesia glomerata and C. rubecula , 1998 .

[38]  S. Strauss,et al.  FLORAL CHARACTERS LINK HERBIVORES, POLLINATORS, AND PLANT FITNESS , 1997 .

[39]  M. Dicke.  Evolution of Induced Indirect Defense of Plants , 1999 .

[40]  P. Parkman.  Scientific Notes: Foliage Consumption by Yellowstriped Armyworm Larvae After Parasitization by Euplectrus Plathypenae , 1981 .