Assessment of radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis. A randomized, controlled trial.

Radiologic assessment of progressive joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis is generally considered to be the ultimate standard for evaluation of treatment. We compared alternative radiologic techniques by performing a randomized, controlled trial in which hand films of rheumatoid arthritis patients were read by several skilled observes. The number of joints evaluated (34 versus 18) was found to make relatively little difference, but the number of readers and their experience level was critical. Films should be read in pairs. Joint space narrowing and erosion scores were shown to contribute independent information. Use of recommended techniques can reduce the number of patients required and, thus, can reduce the cost of a clinical trial by more than half and can substantially increase the sensitivity and efficiency of a trial. Therefore, critical selection of the method of assessing study endpoint is of great importance.

[1]  P. Bacon,et al.  Progression of radiological changes in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1984, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  H K Genant,et al.  Reproducibility of multiple-observer scoring of radiologic abnormalities in the hands and wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1985, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  J. Fries,et al.  Toward an understanding of patient outcome measurement. , 1983, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  M. Kendall,et al.  The advanced theory of statistics , 1945 .

[5]  S. Krane IV. Joint erosion in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1974, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[6]  J. Moreland,et al.  Methods of scoring the progression of radiologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Correlation of radiologic, clinical and laboratory abnormalities. , 1971, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[7]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[8]  R A Dickson,et al.  The distribution of radiological joint damage in the rheumatoid hand. , 1979, Rheumatology and rehabilitation.

[9]  J. Sharp,et al.  Double-blind study of cyclophosphamide in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1973, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  P Tugwell,et al.  Preference for endpoint measures in clinical trials: results of structured workshops. , 1982, The Journal of rheumatology.

[11]  H. Genant Methods of assessing radiographic change in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1983, The American journal of medicine.

[12]  A. Larsen Radiological grading of rheumatoid arthritis. An interobserver study. , 1973, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[13]  J. Kellgren,et al.  Radiological Signs of Rheumatoid Arthritis , 1956, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[14]  H. Isomäki,et al.  Effect of gold treatment on the progression of erosions in RA patients. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[15]  Bunch Tw,et al.  Disease-modifying drugs for progressive rheumatoid arthritis. , 1980 .

[16]  S Jalava,et al.  Healing of erosions in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[17]  W. R. Mccrum,et al.  Gold salts in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. A double-blind study. , 2020, Annals of internal medicine.

[18]  H K Genant,et al.  Optical versus radiographic magnification for fine-detail skeletal radiography. , 1975, Investigative radiology.