Rapid Screening of Urinary Tract Infection and Discrimination of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria by Automated Flow Cytometric Analysis Using Sysmex UF-5000

Rapid screening of urinary tract infection is important to determine antibiotic treatment and reduce unnecessary urine culture. We evaluated the performance of the new flow cytometry-based UF-5000 automated urine analyzer (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). ABSTRACT Rapid screening of urinary tract infection is important to determine antibiotic treatment and reduce unnecessary urine culture. We evaluated the performance of the new flow cytometry-based UF-5000 automated urine analyzer (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). A total of 1,430 urine samples from 1,226 patients were analyzed and compared to urine cultures to which a Previ Isola (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) system was applied. In total, 878 of 1,430 urine cultures (61.4%) produced ≥103 CFU/ml bacterial growth (309 with Gram-negative [GN] bacteria, 517 with Gram-positive [GP] bacteria, and 52 mixed cultures), with 336 samples (23.5%) presenting ≥105 CFU/ml bacterial growth. The ≥105 CFU/ml bacterial growth was detected by a ≥71 bacteria/μl UF-5000 bacterial count with 95% sensitivity and 84% specificity. Using a cutoff of <15 bacteria/μl to determine whether or not to culture, 50.9% of samples were below the cutoff, 94.8 and 99.5% of which presented <104 and <105 CFU/ml of bacterial growth, respectively. The bacterial discrimination performance of the UF-5000 for GN bacteria was superior to that for GP bacteria, and in ≥105 CFU/ml monobacterial samples, the sensitivity and specificity for reporting GN bacteria were 91.7 and 90.0%, respectively. In summary, UF-5000 demonstrated potential utility for the rapid screening of negative bacterial cultures. However, this utility is dependent on the patient population; cutoff optimizations must be performed for specific populations. In addition, UF-5000 presented improved performance in characterizing GP and GN bacteria, although the concurrence rates were not high enough to replace routine cultures.

[1]  A. Boer,et al.  Urine flow cytometry can rule out urinary tract infection, but cannot identify bacterial morphologies correctly. , 2015, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[2]  S. Hultgren,et al.  Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options , 2015, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[3]  P. Rydén,et al.  Flow Cytometry Analysis Using Sysmex UF-1000i Classifies Uropathogens Based on Bacterial, Leukocyte, and Erythrocyte Counts in Urine Specimens among Patients with Urinary Tract Infections , 2014, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[4]  Betsy Foxman,et al.  Urinary tract infection syndromes: occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. , 2014, Infectious disease clinics of North America.

[5]  Yu Kyung Kim,et al.  Evaluation of an Automated Urine Flow Cytometer for Screening of Bacterial Contamination in Platelet Concentrates , 2012 .

[6]  M. Broeren,et al.  Screening for Urinary Tract Infection with the Sysmex UF-1000i Urine Flow Cytometer , 2011, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[7]  M. Deckers,et al.  Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-1000i® urine flow cytometer in the diagnostic work-up of suspected urinary tract infection in a Dutch general hospital , 2010, Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.

[8]  M. Rocchi,et al.  Diagnosis of Bacteriuria and Leukocyturia by Automated Flow Cytometry Compared with Urine Culture , 2010, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[9]  H. Sarkkinen,et al.  Screening of Urine Samples by Flow Cytometry Reduces the Need for Culture , 2010, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[10]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-1000i for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  Sudhir Aggarwal,et al.  Urinary tract infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a minireview. , 2009, Journal of infection and public health.