Collective Animal Behavior from Bayesian Estimation and Probability Matching
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Knill,et al. The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.
[2] M E BITTERMAN,et al. Probability-Learning by the Turtle , 1965, Science.
[3] Robert A Jacobs,et al. Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[4] T. Valone,et al. Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[5] I. Couzin,et al. Self-Organization and Collective Behavior in Vertebrates , 2003 .
[6] Marta B Manser,et al. Moving calls: a vocal mechanism underlying quorum decisions in cohesive groups , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[7] Jean Clobert,et al. The role of public information in ecology and conservation: an emphasis on inadvertent social information , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[8] Thomas J. Valone,et al. Are animals capable of Bayesian updating? An empirical review , 2006 .
[9] J. Gold,et al. Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[10] R. Menzel,et al. Memory dynamics and foraging strategies of honeybees , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[11] D. Sumpter,et al. Consensus Decision Making by Fish , 2008, Current Biology.
[12] Charles Kemp,et al. How to Grow a Mind: Statistics, Structure, and Abstraction , 2011, Science.
[13] I. Couzin,et al. Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[14] G. Schwarz. Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .
[15] Paul J. B. Hart,et al. Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[16] E. S. Pearson,et al. On the Problem of the Most Efficient Tests of Statistical Hypotheses , 1933 .
[17] Luc-Alain Giraldeau,et al. Vicarious sampling: the use of personal and public information by starlings foraging in a simple patchy environment , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[18] I. Couzin,et al. Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.
[19] Aaron C. Courville,et al. Bayesian theories of conditioning in a changing world , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[20] S. L. Lima,et al. Collective detection of predatory attack by social foragers: fraught with ambiguity? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[21] J. Saunders,et al. Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? , 2003, Vision Research.
[22] I. Couzin,et al. Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.
[23] S. Fretwell,et al. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .
[24] Nir Vulkan. An Economist's Perspective on Probability Matching , 2000 .
[25] S. D. Eneubourg. Pheromone trail decay rates on different substrates in the Pharaoh’s ant, Monomorium pharaonis , 2003 .
[26] Konrad Paul Kording,et al. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.
[27] J. Gold,et al. The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.
[28] G. C. Tiao,et al. Bayesian inference in statistical analysis , 1973 .
[29] R J HERRNSTEIN,et al. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[30] M. E. Bitterman,et al. Probability-Matching in the Fish , 1961 .
[31] L. Giraldeau,et al. Persuasive companions can be wrong: the use of misleading social information in nutmeg mannikins , 2009 .
[32] William A Link,et al. Model weights and the foundations of multimodel inference. , 2006, Ecology.
[33] I. Coolen,et al. Species difference in adaptive use of public information in sticklebacks , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[34] Thomas J Valone,et al. Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[35] W. Gaissmaier,et al. The smart potential behind probability matching , 2008, Cognition.
[36] Kevin N Laland,et al. Nine-spined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[37] C. Clark,et al. The evolutionary advantages of group foraging , 1986 .
[38] Konrad Paul Kording,et al. Review TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control , 2022 .
[39] R. Jacobs,et al. Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth , 1999, Vision Research.
[40] Jean Clobert,et al. Public Information and Breeding Habitat Selection in a Wild Bird Population , 2002, Science.
[41] Ola Olsson,et al. Bayes' theorem and its applications in animal behaviour , 2006 .
[42] D. Sumpter. The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[43] Craig W. Benkman,et al. The use and misuse of public information by foraging red crossbills , 1999 .
[44] P.N.J. Mackintosh. Adaptive Behavior and Learning, J.E.R. Staddon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984), xiii, +555. Price £30.00 hardback, £10.95 paperback , 1984 .
[45] M. Ernst,et al. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.
[46] D. Burr,et al. The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.
[47] I. Couzin. Collective cognition in animal groups , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[48] Richard H. Wagner,et al. A taxonomy of biological information , 2010 .
[49] T. Valone. Group foraging, public information, and patch estimation , 1989 .
[50] Thierry Boulinier,et al. The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding patch selection in terrestrial migratory species , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.
[51] J. Biernaskie,et al. Bumblebees Learn to Forage like Bayesians , 2009, The American Naturalist.
[52] A. Houston,et al. Switching between resources and the ideal free distribution , 1987, Animal Behaviour.
[53] Nordell,et al. Mate choice copying as public information , 1998 .
[54] G D Ruxton,et al. Modelling antipredator vigilance and flight response in group foragers when warning signals are ambiguous. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.
[55] E. T. Jaynes,et al. Probability Theory as Logic , 1990 .
[56] E. S. Pearson,et al. On the Problem of the Most Efficient Tests of Statistical Hypotheses , 1933 .
[57] Tim Kovacs,et al. On optimal decision-making in brains and social insect colonies , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[58] Ulrik R. Beierholm,et al. Probability Matching as a Computational Strategy Used in Perception , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[59] J. Alonso,et al. Patch use in cranes: a field test of optimal foraging predictions , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[60] Sasha R. X. Dall,et al. Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[61] A. Oaten,et al. Optimal foraging in patches: a case for stochasticity. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.
[62] Ernst Mach,et al. Contributions to the Analysis of the Sensations , 1998 .
[63] Guy Cowlishaw,et al. When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making , 2007, Biology Letters.
[64] Edwin Thompson Jaynes,et al. Probability theory , 2003 .
[65] J. Kruschke. Locally Bayesian learning with applications to retrospective revaluation and highlighting. , 2006, Psychological review.
[66] Jennifer J. Templeton,et al. Patch assessment in foraging flocks of European starlings: evidence for the use of public information , 1995 .
[67] D. Sumpter,et al. Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.