Semantic Similarity of Natural Language Spatial Relations

Communication problems between humans and machines are often the reason for failures or wrong computations. While machines use well-defined languages and rules in formal models to compute information, humans prefer natural language expressions with only vaguely specified semantics. Similarity comparisons are a central construct of the human way of thinking. For instance, humans are able to act sensible in completely new situations by comparing them to similar experiences in the past. Similarity is used for reasoning on unknown information. It is necessary to overcome the differences in representing and processing information to avoid error-prone communication. A machine being able to understand natural language and detect the semantic similarity between expressions would be the key to eliminate human-machine communication problems. This paper addresses human-machine communication about spatial configurations in natural language. We propose a computational model to capture the semantics of natural language spatial relations and to compare them with respect to their semantic similarity. The semantic description is based on an approach developed by Shariff, Egenhofer and Mark which describes natural language spatial relations via a combination of several formal spatial relations. The semantic similarity measure is inspired by Gärdenfors’ conceptual spaces: we model the formal relations as quality dimensions of a geometric space, describe the natural language expressions as regions in the multidimensional space and determine their similarity via spatial distances.

[1]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  How to make the Semantic Web more semantic , 2004 .

[2]  M. Egenhofer,et al.  Topology of Prototypical Spatial Relations Between Lines and Regions in English and Spanish 1 , 1995 .

[3]  Paul D. Minton,et al.  Statistics: The Exploration and Analysis of Data , 2002, Technometrics.

[4]  Angela Schwering,et al.  Hybrid Model for Semantic Similarity Measurement , 2005, OTM Conferences.

[5]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space , 1992, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[6]  P. Gärdenfors Conceptual spaces as a framework for knowledge representation , 2004 .

[7]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Natural-language spatial relations: metric refinements of topological properties , 1996 .

[8]  David M. Mark,et al.  Natural-Language Spatial Relations Between Linear and Areal Objects: The Topology and Metric of English-Language Terms , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Angela Schwering,et al.  Spatial Relations for Semantic Similarity Measurement , 2005, ER.

[10]  David M. Mark,et al.  Modelling Conceptual Neighbourhoods of Toplogical Line-Region Relations , 1995, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[11]  M. Egenhofer,et al.  Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations , 2001 .

[12]  Mikael Johannesson,et al.  Combining Integral and Seperable Subspaces , 2001 .

[13]  Roy Rada,et al.  Development and application of a metric on semantic nets , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  Angela Schwering,et al.  The Influence of Scale, Context and Spatial Preposition in Linguistic Topology , 2006, Spatial Cognition.

[15]  Kenny R. Coventry,et al.  Seeing, saying and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions , 2004 .

[16]  David M. Mark,et al.  Naive Geography , 1995, COSIT.

[17]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Foundations of Measurement, Vol. II: Geometrical, Threshold, and Probabilistic Representations , 1989 .

[18]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Qualitative Spatial Reasoning: Cardinal Directions as an Example , 1996, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Reasoning about Gradual Changes of Topological Relationships , 1992, Spatio-Temporal Reasoning.

[20]  N. Foo Conceptual Spaces—The Geometry of Thought , 2022 .

[21]  F ATTNEAVE,et al.  Dimensions of similarity. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.

[22]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Metric details for natural-language spatial relations , 1998, TOIS.

[23]  Mikael Johannesson,et al.  Geometric Models of Similarity , 2002 .

[24]  Reinhard Moratz,et al.  Spatial Reference in Linguistic Human-Robot Interaction: Iterative, Empirically Supported Development of a Model of Projective Relations , 2006, Spatial Cogn. Comput..