Authority This publication has been developed by NIST in accordance with its statutory responsibilities under the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014, 44 U.S.C. § 3551 et seq., Public Law (P.L.) 113-283. NIST is responsible for developing information security standards and guidelines, including minimum requirements for federal information systems, but such standards and guidelines shall not apply to national security systems without the express approval of appropriate federal officials exercising policy authority over such systems. This guideline is consistent with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-130. Nothing in this publication should be taken to contradict the standards and guidelines made mandatory and binding on federal agencies by the Secretary of Commerce under statutory authority. Nor should these guidelines be interpreted as altering or superseding the existing authorities of the Secretary of Commerce, Director of the OMB, or any other federal official. This publication may be used by nongovernmental organizations on a voluntary basis and is not subject to copyright in the United States. Attribution would, however, be appreciated by NIST. Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by NIST, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. There may be references in this publication to other publications currently under development by NIST in accordance with its assigned statutory responsibilities. The information in this publication, including concepts and methodologies, may be used by Federal agencies even before the completion of such companion publications. Thus, until each publication is completed, current requirements, guidelines, and procedures, where they exist, remain operative. For planning and transition purposes, Federal agencies may wish to closely follow the development of these new publications by NIST. Organizations are encouraged to review all draft publications during public comment periods and provide feedback to NIST. Many NIST cybersecurity publications, other than the ones noted above, are available at All comments are subject to release under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the Nation's measurement and standards infrastructure. ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analyses to advance the development and productive use of information technology. …
[1]
Charu C. Aggarwal,et al.
On k-Anonymity and the Curse of Dimensionality
,
2005,
VLDB.
[2]
Khaled El Emam,et al.
Estimating the re-identification risk of clinical data sets
,
2012,
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.
[3]
Alonzo Church,et al.
A note on the Entscheidungsproblem
,
1936,
Journal of Symbolic Logic.
[4]
Vitaly Shmatikov,et al.
Robust De-anonymization of Large Sparse Datasets
,
2008,
2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (sp 2008).
[5]
Ninghui Li,et al.
t-Closeness: Privacy Beyond k-Anonymity and l-Diversity
,
2007,
2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering.
[6]
K. El Emam,et al.
Methods for the de-identification of electronic health records for genomic research
,
2011,
Genome Medicine.
[7]
Shuying Shen,et al.
BoB, a best-of-breed automated text de-identification system for VHA clinical documents
,
2013,
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..
[8]
G. Duncan,et al.
Private Lives and Public Policies: Confidentiality and Accessibility of Government Statistics
,
1993
.
[9]
Emmanuel Saez,et al.
Income inequality in the United States
,
2003
.
[10]
English Only.
Economic Commission for Europe
,
2012
.
[11]
Jim Waldo,et al.
How to De-identify Your Data
,
2015,
ACM Queue.
[12]
Johannes Gehrke,et al.
Interactive anonymization of sensitive data
,
2009,
SIGMOD Conference.
[13]
J. Domingo-Ferrer,et al.
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MICROAGGREGATION METHODS
,
1998
.
[14]
James O. Chipperfield,et al.
A Summary of Attack Methods and Confidentiality Protection Measures for Fully Automated Remote Analysis Systems
,
2013
.
[15]
Latanya Sweeney,et al.
k-Anonymity: A Model for Protecting Privacy
,
2002,
Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..
[16]
ASHWIN MACHANAVAJJHALA,et al.
L-diversity: privacy beyond k-anonymity
,
2006,
22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'06).
[17]
Chris Clifton,et al.
Hiding the presence of individuals from shared databases
,
2007,
SIGMOD '07.
[18]
K. O’Hara,et al.
The Anonymisation Decision-Making Framework
,
2016
.
[19]
Paul Ohm.
Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization
,
2009
.
[20]
A. Turing.
On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem.
,
1937
.
[21]
Tanvi Desai,et al.
Five Safes: designing data access for research
,
2016
.