Summary of well water sampling in California to detect pesticide residues resulting from nonpoint-source applications.

This report summarizes well sampling protocols, data collection procedures, and analytical results for the presence of pesticides in ground water developed by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR). Specific well sampling protocols were developed to meet regulatory mandates of the Pesticide Contamination Prevention Act (PCPA) of 1986 and to provide further understanding of the agronomic, chemical, and geographic factors that contribute to movement of residues to ground water. The well sampling data have formed the basis for the DPR's regulatory decisions. For example, a sampling protocol, the Four-Section Survey, was developed to determine if reported detections were caused by nonpoint-source agricultural applications, a determination that can initiate formal review and subsequent regulation of a pesticide. Selection of sampling sites, which are primarily rural domestic wells, was initially based on pesticide use and cropping patterns. Recently, soil and depth-to-ground water data have been added to identify areas where a higher frequency of detection is expected. In accordance with the PCPA, the DPR maintains a database for all pesticide well sampling in California with submission required by all state agencies and with invitations for submission extended to all local and federal agencies or other entities. To date, residues for 16 active ingredients and breakdown products have been detected in California ground water as a result of legal agricultural use. Regulations have been adopted for all detected parent active ingredients, and they have been developed regardless of the level of detection.

[1]  N. Dubrovsky,et al.  Chlorofluorocarbon Dating of Herbicide-Containing Well Waters in Fresno and Tulare Counties, California , 2000 .

[2]  M. Wilkerson,et al.  THE PESTICIDE CONTAMINATION PREVENTION ACT : SETTING SPECIFIC NUMERICAL VALUES , 2000 .

[3]  F. Spurlock,et al.  Empirical Modeling of Spatial Vulnerability Applied to a Norflurazon Retrospective Well Study in California , 1999 .

[4]  Robert J. Gilliom,et al.  Summary and evaluation of pesticides in field blanks collected for the National Water-Quality Assessment Program, 1992-95 , 1999 .

[5]  Bruce R. Johnson.  SETTING REVISED SPECIFIC NUMERICAL VALUES April , 1991 Pursuant to the Pesticide Contamination Prevention Act BY , 1999 .

[6]  E. Thurman,et al.  The Environmental Occurrence of Herbicides: The Importance of Degradates in Ground Water , 1998, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[7]  Alan C. York,et al.  The Impact of Pesticide Use on Groundwater in North Carolina , 1998 .

[8]  Bruce R. Johnson,et al.  Pesticide Movement to Groundwater: Application of Areal Vulnerability Assessments and Well Monitoring to Mitigation Measures , 1998 .

[9]  L. Brown,et al.  Environmental setting of the San Joaquin-Tulare basins, California , 1998 .

[10]  E. Thurman,et al.  Occurrence of Selected Herbicides and Herbicide Degradation Products in Iowa's Ground Water, 1995 , 1997 .

[11]  Bruce R. Johnson,et al.  profiling areas of ground water contamination by pesticides in california: phase ii – evaluation and modification of a statistical model , 1997 .

[12]  J. Troiano,et al.  Use of cluster and principal component analyses to profile areas in California where ground water has been contaminated by pesticides , 1994, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[13]  Istvan Bogardi,et al.  Correlation Between DRASTIC Vulnerabilities and Incidents of VOC Contamination of Municipal Wells in Nebraska , 1994 .

[14]  S. J. Marade,et al.  Monitoring for aldicarb residues in ground water of the Central Valley of California , 1994, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[15]  J. Troiano,et al.  Influence of amount and method of irrigation water application on leaching of atrazine , 1993 .

[16]  L. L. Piper,et al.  Results of the National Alachlor Well Water Survey , 1992 .

[17]  M. Reinhard,et al.  Transformation and Sorption of 1,2‐Dibromo‐3‐Chloropropane in Subsurface Samples Collected at Fresno, California , 1991 .

[18]  Yvonne J. Meeks,et al.  Evaluating Ground‐Water Vulnerability to Pesticides , 1990 .

[19]  George R. Hallberg,et al.  Pesticides pollution of groundwater in the humid United States , 1989 .

[20]  L. Aller,et al.  Drastic: A Standardized System to Evaluate Groundwater Pollution Potential using Hydrogeologic Setting , 1987 .

[21]  Russell L. Jones,et al.  Field, Laboratory, and Modeling Studies on the Degradation and Transport of Aldicarb Residues in Soil and Ground Water , 1986 .

[22]  S. Creeger.  Considering Pesticide Potential for Reaching Ground Water in the Registration of Pesticides , 1986 .

[23]  H. Nigg,et al.  Evaluation of pesticides in ground water , 1986 .

[24]  D. Rosenblatt,et al.  Kinetics and products of hydrolysis of 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane. , 1982, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  K. Maddy,et al.  A study of samples of well water collected from selected areas in California to determine the presence of DBCP and certain other pesticide residues , 1980, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.