Sentence comprehension
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Dynamical models of sentence processing , 1999, Cogn. Sci..
[2] Adele E. Goldberg,et al. Generalizing beyond the input: The functions of the constructions matter , 2015 .
[3] Brian McElree,et al. Comprehension of Linguistic Dependencies: Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff Evidence for Direct-Access Retrieval From Memory , 2011, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[4] H. Simon,et al. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .
[5] B. McElree,et al. Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.
[6] A. Sanford,et al. Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[7] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints , 1995, Cognition.
[8] Geoffrey E. Hinton. Learning and Applying Contextual Constraints in Sentence Comprehension , 1991 .
[9] Douglas Roland,et al. Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.
[10] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .
[11] Bill Macken,et al. Questioning short-term memory and its measurement: Why digit span measures long-term associative learning , 2015, Cognition.
[12] A. Clark. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[13] Satinder Singh,et al. Computational Rationality: Linking Mechanism and Behavior Through Bounded Utility Maximization , 2014, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[14] John Hale,et al. A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.
[15] Clinton L. Johns,et al. Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension , 2014, Cognition.
[16] G. A. Miller. THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .
[17] Gina R Kuperberg,et al. What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? , 2016, Language, cognition and neuroscience.
[18] Richard L. Lewis,et al. Retrieval Interference in Syntactic Processing: The Case of Reflexive Binding in English , 2016, Front. Psychol..
[19] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Experience and generalization in a connectionist model of Mandarin Chinese relative clause processing , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[20] George A. Miller,et al. Introduction to the Formal Analysis of Natural Languages , 1968 .
[21] John R. Anderson,et al. A rational analysis of human memory. , 1989 .
[22] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics: Individual Differences in Sentence Processing , 2012 .
[23] Lyn Frazier,et al. The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences , 1983 .
[24] Silvia P. Gennari,et al. Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.
[25] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Sentence processing and the clause boundary , 1978 .
[26] Emily S. Darowski,et al. Lingering misinterpretations in garden-path sentences: evidence from a paraphrasing task. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[27] Daniel J. Acheson,et al. The Rhymes that the Reader Perused Confused the Meaning: Phonological Effects during On-line Sentence Comprehension. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.
[28] William O’Grady,et al. Relative clauses Processing and acquisition * , 2011 .
[29] Daniel Wiechmann. Understanding Relative Clauses: A Usage-Based View on the Processing of Complex Constructions , 2014 .
[30] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. How language production shapes language form and comprehension , 2012, Front. Psychol..
[31] Ting Qian,et al. Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension , 2013, PloS one.
[32] M. MacDonald,et al. Pragmatic constraint on the interpretation of complex noun phrases in Spanish and English. , 1999 .
[33] Alan Kennedy,et al. Eye movements in reading: Some theoretical context , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[34] Edith Kaan,et al. Event-Related Potentials and Language Processing: A Brief Overview , 2007, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[35] Nick Chater,et al. Finite models of infinite language: A connectionist approach to recursion , 2001 .
[36] Stephani Foraker,et al. Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension , 2003 .
[37] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Speak, Act, Remember , 2016 .
[38] Adrian Staub,et al. Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses , 2010, Cognition.
[39] Janet Dean Fodor,et al. The Mental Representation of Quantifiers , 1982 .
[40] Scott H. Fraundorf,et al. Readers generalize adaptation to newly-encountered dialectal structures to other unfamiliar structures. , 2016, Journal of memory and language.
[41] Joseph L. Austerweil,et al. Analyzing the history of Cognition using Topic Models , 2015, Cognition.
[42] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Constraint Satisfaction Accounts of Lexical and Sentence Comprehension , 2006 .
[43] C. Preston. Pluralism and Naturalism: Why the Proliferation of Theories is Good for the Mind , 2005 .
[44] Douglas Roland,et al. Verb Sense and Verb Subcategorization Probabilities , 2001 .
[45] C M Connine,et al. Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[46] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Word chunk frequencies affect the processing of pronominal object-relative clauses , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[47] Dylan M. Jones,et al. The phonological store of working memory: is it phonological and is it a store? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[48] Thomas G. Bever,et al. Subject Preference in the Processingof Relative Clauses in Chinese , 2006 .
[49] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. The emergence of grammaticality in connectionist networks. , 1999 .
[50] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Approaches to studying world-situated language use : bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions , 2005 .
[51] G. Kempen,et al. Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar , 2000, Cognition.
[52] Zenzi M. Griffin,et al. Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .
[53] M. Pickering,et al. Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[54] A. Friederici. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[55] Alex B. Fine,et al. Evidence for Implicit Learning in Syntactic Comprehension , 2013, Cogn. Sci..
[56] Stephanie W. Haas. Construal , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..
[57] W. Levelt,et al. Same, different, or closely related: What is the relationship between language production and comprehension? , 2016 .
[58] Michael P. Kaschak,et al. This construction needs learned. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[59] Eugene J. Dawydiak,et al. Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: An application of the change-detection paradigm , 2004, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[60] William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al. The On-Line Effects of Semantic Context on Syntactic Processing , 1977 .
[61] David Marr,et al. VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .
[62] K. Rayner,et al. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.
[63] Roger Levy,et al. Sequential vs. Hierarchical Syntactic Models of Human Incremental Sentence Processing , 2012, CMCL@NAACL-HLT.
[64] Julie A. Van Dyke,et al. Memory Interference as a Determinant of Language Comprehension , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[65] Jelena Mirkovic,et al. Incrementality and Prediction in Human Sentence Processing , 2009, Cogn. Sci..
[66] Dan Jurafsky,et al. Probabilistic Modeling in Psycholinguistics: Linguistic Comprehension and Production , 2006 .
[67] Zenzi M. Griffin,et al. Structural Priming as Implicit Learning: A Comparison of Models of Sentence Production , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[68] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Sentence comprehension before and after 1970: Topics, debates and techniques , 2013 .
[69] Gerard Kempen,et al. The Unification Space implemented as a localist neural net: predictions and error-tolerance in a constraint-based parser , 2009, Cognitive Neurodynamics.
[70] Charles Hulme,et al. Sentence repetition is a measure of children's language skills rather than working memory limitations , 2014, Developmental science.
[71] M K Tanenhaus,et al. Eye Movements and Lexical Access in Spoken-Language Comprehension: Evaluating a Linking Hypothesis between Fixations and Linguistic Processing , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[72] Gina R. Kuperberg,et al. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.
[73] Edward Gibson,et al. The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension : Evidence against domain-specific working memory resources , 2006 .
[74] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Linking production and comprehension processes: The case of relative clauses , 2009, Cognition.
[75] M. Tanenhaus. Afterword The impact of “The cognitive basis for linguistic structures” , 2013 .
[76] M. Gareth Gaskell,et al. Does Sleep Improve Your Grammar? Preferential Consolidation of Arbitrary Components of New Linguistic Knowledge , 2016, PloS one.
[77] Christina S. Kim,et al. Syntactic Priming without Lexical Overlap in Reading Comprehension , 2014, Language and speech.
[78] Maryellen C MacDonald,et al. When language comprehension reflects production constraints: Resolving ambiguities with the help of past experience , 2009, Memory & cognition.
[79] Nayoung Kwon,et al. Cognitive and linguistic factors affecting subject/object asymmetry: An eye-tracking study of prenominal relative clauses in Korean , 2010 .
[80] Susanne Gahl,et al. Verb subcategorization frequencies: American English corpus data, methodological studies, and cross-corpus comparisons , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[81] Stephen B. Barton,et al. A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment , 1993, Memory & cognition.
[82] Clinton L Johns,et al. Identifying the role of phonology in sentence-level reading. , 2015, Journal of memory and language.
[83] Sang Joon Kim,et al. A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .
[84] Florencia Reali. Frequency Affects Object Relative Clause Processing: Some Evidence in Favor of Usage-Based Accounts. , 2014 .
[85] John Hale,et al. Uncertainty About the Rest of the Sentence , 2006, Cogn. Sci..
[86] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .
[87] G. Hickok,et al. Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism , 1996, Cognition.
[88] W D Marslen-Wilson,et al. Sentence Perception as an Interactive Parallel Process , 1975, Science.
[89] Leon Bergen,et al. Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[90] G. A. Miller,et al. Finitary models of language users , 1963 .
[91] J. Woolley,et al. Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[92] Nelson Cowan,et al. Working Memory Capacity , 2005 .
[93] F. Ferreira,et al. Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from competing syntactic representations , 2013 .
[94] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.
[95] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Reassessing Working Memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996) , 2002 .
[96] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[97] A. Hollingworth,et al. Thematic Roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.
[98] P. Gordon,et al. Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity , 2004 .
[99] Nathaniel J. Smith,et al. The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic , 2013, Cognition.
[100] Thomas A. Farmer,et al. Early Occipital Sensitivity to Syntactic Category Is Based on Form Typicality , 2010, Psychological science.
[101] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: Distributional learning in a miniature language , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.
[102] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .
[103] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..
[104] Robin K. Morris,et al. Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2002 .
[105] A. H. Kawamoto. Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. , 1993 .
[106] Cordula Vesper,et al. A minimal architecture for joint action , 2010, Neural Networks.
[107] David E. Rumelhart,et al. Toward an interactive model of reading. , 1994 .
[108] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Language knowledge and event knowledge in language use , 2015, Cognitive Psychology.
[109] Lyn Frazier,et al. Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .
[110] K. Rayner,et al. Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[111] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.
[112] Andrea E. Martin,et al. Language Processing as Cue Integration: Grounding the Psychology of Language in Perception and Neurophysiology , 2016, Front. Psychol..
[113] James L. McClelland. Integrating probabilistic models of perception and interactive neural networks: a historical and tutorial review , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[114] Daniel J. Acheson,et al. Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.
[115] Scott Cheng-Hsin Yang,et al. A Unifying Computational Framework for Teaching and Active Learning , 2018, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[116] M. Just,et al. From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .
[117] Prahlad Gupta,et al. Does Phonological Short-Term Memory Causally Determine Vocabulary Learning? Toward a Computational Resolution of the Debate. , 2009 .
[118] Falk Huettig,et al. Is prediction necessary to understand language , 2016 .
[119] Kristen M. Tooley,et al. Syntactic Priming Effects in Comprehension: A Critical Review , 2010, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[120] WILLIAM MARSLEN-WILSON,et al. Processing structure of sentence perception , 1975, Nature.
[121] Albert Kim,et al. The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics: The Neurobiology of Sentence Comprehension , 2012 .
[122] M. Just,et al. Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .
[123] J. Kimball. Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language , 1973 .
[124] M. MacDonald. Distributional Information in Language Comprehension, Production, and Acquisition: Three Puzzles and a Moral , 2013 .
[125] R. M. Warren,et al. Phonemic restorations based on subsequent context , 1974 .