Using the null-stream of GEO 600 to veto transient events in the detector output

A network of gravitational wave detectors is currently being commissioned around the world. Each of these detectors will search for gravitational waves from various astronomical sources. One of the main searches underway is for un-modelled, transient gravitational wave events. The nature of these signals is such that it will be difficult to distinguish them from bursts of instrumental noise that originate in or around the detector and which then couple to the main detector output. One way to deal with this is to look for events that are coincident in more than one gravitational wave detector. However, with very large event lists (potentially thousands of events per day per detector), the number of events that pass this test due to random chance can still be large. At each detector site, various methods are being developed to veto instrumental bursts from lists of candidate events from that particular detector. This reduces the size of the event lists of each detector, and hopefully the final coincident event list, to a more manageable level. This paper presents one such veto method that can be used to veto certain classes of transient events detected in the output data stream of GEO 600. The method uses events detected in the null-stream output of GEO 600 (which contains, in principle, no gravitational wave signal) with a threshold to veto events detected in the main strain output. We show that, for the certain types of signals tested, the method is very robust, delivering high efficiency for a very low false-veto rate. In particular, it is shown that when applied to real detector data, the method is able to strongly veto a certain type of events which appear around 370 Hz in the detector output.

[1]  J. Smith,et al.  Robust vetoes for gravitational-wave burst triggers using known instrumental couplings , 2006, gr-qc/0605079.

[2]  Benno Willke,et al.  Optimal time-domain combination of the two calibrated output quadratures of GEO 600 , 2005 .

[3]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  Results from the first burst hardware injections performed on GEO 600 , 2005 .

[4]  Alessandra Di Credico Gravitational wave burst vetoes in the LIGO S2 and S3 data analyses , 2005 .

[5]  N. Christensen Veto studies for LIGO inspiral triggers , 2005, gr-qc/0504067.

[6]  S. Babak,et al.  Signal based vetoes for the detection of gravitational waves from inspiralling compact binaries , 2005, gr-qc/0502002.

[7]  Bruce Allen χ2 time-frequency discriminator for gravitational wave detection , 2005 .

[8]  Kenneth A. Strain,et al.  Principles of calibrating the dual-recycled GEO 600 , 2004 .

[9]  M. M. Casey,et al.  Commissioning, characterization and operation of the dual-recycled GEO 600 , 2004 .

[10]  B. Krishnan,et al.  Chi-square test on candidate events from CW signal coherent searches , 2004, gr-qc/0408092.

[11]  E. Ochsner,et al.  A new waveform consistency test for gravitational wave inspiral searches , 2004, gr-qc/0404064.

[12]  P. Shawhan,et al.  Vetoes for inspiral triggers in LIGO data , 2004, gr-qc/0403114.

[13]  B. Schutz,et al.  First steps towards characterizing the hierarchical algorithm for curves and ridges pipeline , 2004 .

[14]  I. Heng,et al.  PQMon: a powerful veto for burst events , 2003 .

[15]  Calibration of the power-recycled gravitational wave detector, GEO 600 , 2003 .

[16]  Back reaction of the neutrino field in an Einstein universe , 2002, gr-qc/0212123.

[17]  Benno Willke,et al.  Dual recycling for GEO 600 , 2002 .

[18]  G. Prodi,et al.  χ2testing of optimal filters for gravitational wave signals: An experimental implementation , 2000, astro-ph/0001148.

[19]  M. Tinto,et al.  Near optimal solution to the inverse problem for gravitational-wave bursts. , 1989, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.