Leaf sequencing algorithms for segmented multileaf collimation.

The delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with a multileaf collimator (MLC) requires the conversion of a radiation fluence map into a leaf sequence file that controls the movement of the MLC during radiation delivery. It is imperative that the fluence map delivered using the leaf sequence file is as close as possible to the fluence map generated by the dose optimization algorithm, while satisfying hardware constraints of the delivery system. Optimization of the leaf sequencing algorithm has been the subject of several recent investigations. In this work, we present a systematic study of the optimization of leaf sequencing algorithms for segmental multileaf collimator beam delivery and provide rigorous mathematical proofs of optimized leaf sequence settings in terms of monitor unit (MU) efficiency under most common leaf movement constraints that include minimum leaf separation constraint and leaf interdigitation constraint. Our analytical analysis shows that leaf sequencing based on unidirectional movement of the MLC leaves is as MU efficient as bidirectional movement of the MLC leaves.

[1]  S Webb,et al.  Generation of discrete beam-intensity modulation by dynamic multileaf collimation under minimum leaf separation constraints. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  James A. Purdy,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: current status and issues of interest. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  W Schlegel,et al.  Dynamic X-ray compensation for conformal radiotherapy by means of multi-leaf collimation. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  S. Spirou,et al.  Generation of arbitrary intensity profiles by dynamic jaws or multileaf collimators. , 1994, Medical physics.

[5]  J. V. van Santvoort,et al.  Leaf trajectory calculation for dynamic multileaf collimation to realize optimized fluence profiles. , 1998, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[6]  P. C. Williams,et al.  The design and performance characteristics of a multileaf collimator , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  D Followill,et al.  Estimates of whole-body dose equivalent produced by beam intensity modulated conformal therapy. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  D. Convery,et al.  The generation of intensity-modulated fields for conformal radiotherapy by dynamic collimation , 1992 .

[9]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Realization and verification of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with modulated fields. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  P. Xia,et al.  Multileaf collimator leaf sequencing algorithm for intensity modulated beams with multiple static segments. , 1998, Medical physics.

[11]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  A L Boyer,et al.  An optimized leaf-setting algorithm for beam intensity modulation using dynamic multileaf collimators , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  M. Langer,et al.  Improved leaf sequencing reduces segments or monitor units needed to deliver IMRT using multileaf collimators. , 2001, Medical physics.

[14]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Beam characteristics of a retrofitted double-focused multileaf collimator. , 1998, Medical physics.

[15]  S Mutic,et al.  Room shielding for intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment facilities. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  J. V. van Santvoort,et al.  Dynamic multileaf collimation without 'tongue-and-groove' underdosage effects. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.