Effects of soil–structure interaction on real time dynamic response of offshore wind turbines on monopiles

Abstract Offshore wind turbines are highly dynamically loaded structures, their response being dominated by the interrelation effects between the turbine and the support structure. Since the dynamic response of wind turbine structures occurs in a frequency range close to the excitation frequencies related to environmental and parametric harmonic loads, the effects of the support structure and the subsoil on the natural vibration characteristics of the turbine have to be taken into account during the dynamic simulation of the structural response in order to ensure reliable and cost-effective designs. In this paper, a computationally efficient modelling approach of including the dynamic soil–structure interaction into aeroelastic codes is presented with focus on monopile foundations. Semi-analytical frequency-domain solutions are applied to evaluate the dynamic impedance functions of the soil–pile system at a number of discrete frequencies. Based on a general and very stable fitting algorithm, a consistent lumped-parameter model of optimal order is calibrated to the impedance functions and implemented into the aeroelastic nonlinear multi-body code HAWC2 to facilitate the time domain analysis of a wind turbine under normal operating mode. The aeroelastic response is evaluated for three different foundation conditions, i.e. apparent fixity length, the consistent lumped-parameter model and fixed support at the seabed. The effect of soil–structure interaction is shown to be critical for the design, estimated in terms of the fatigue damage 1 Hz equivalent moment at the seabed. In addition, simplified foundation modelling approaches are only able to capture the dynamic response reasonably well after tuning of the first natural frequency and damping within the first mode to those of the integrated model. Nevertheless, significant loss of accuracy of the modal parameters related to the second tower modes is observed.

[1]  Milos Novak,et al.  Dynamic Response of Pile Foundations in Torsion , 1978 .

[2]  Milos Novak,et al.  Resistance of soil to a horizontally vibrating pile , 1977 .

[3]  Anestis S. Veletsos,et al.  LATERAL AND ROCKING VIBRATION OF FOOTINGS , 1971 .

[4]  Jose M. Roesset,et al.  Dynamic stiffness of piles , 1976 .

[5]  Boris Jeremić,et al.  Numerical modeling and simulation of pile in liquefiable soil , 2009 .

[6]  Milos Novak,et al.  Dynamic Stiffness and Damping of Piles , 1974 .

[7]  R. Guyan.  Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices , 1965 .

[8]  M. E. Naggar,et al.  Dynamic analysis for laterally loaded piles and dynamic p-y curves , 2000 .

[9]  John P. Wolf,et al.  Foundation Vibration Analysis Using Simple Physical Models , 1994 .

[10]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Cross-wind modal properties of offshore wind turbines identified by full scale testing , 2013 .

[11]  Varun,et al.  A generalized hysteresis model for biaxial response of pile foundations in sands , 2012 .

[12]  Nathan M. Newmark,et al.  A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics , 1959 .

[13]  M. Seidel,et al.  Validation of Offshore load simulations using measurement data from the DOWNVInD project , 2009 .

[14]  W. Thomson,et al.  Transmission of Elastic Waves through a Stratified Solid Medium , 1950 .

[15]  S. Kramer.  Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 1996 .

[16]  Milos Novak,et al.  Soil‐pile interaction in vertical vibration , 1976 .

[17]  Milos Novak,et al.  Nonlinear analysis for dynamic lateral pile response , 1996 .

[18]  M. F. Randolph.  Piles Subjected to Torsion , 1981 .

[19]  Kazuo Konagai,et al.  Nonlinear soil-pile interaction model for dynamic lateral motion , 1992 .

[20]  N. A. Haskell.  The Dispersion of Surface Waves on Multilayered Media , 1953 .

[21]  Ricardo Dobry,et al.  Horizontal Response of Piles in Layered Soils , 1984 .

[22]  Nenad Gucunski,et al.  Effects of obstacles on Rayleigh wave dispersion obtained from the SASW test , 1996 .

[23]  Milos Novak,et al.  Torsional Vibrations of Pile Foundations , 1977 .

[24]  D. P. Hurdle,et al.  Revision of SPM 1984 wave hindcast model to avoid inconsistencies in engineering applications , 1989 .

[25]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Three-Dimensional Elastodynamic analysis using multiple boundary element domains , 2001 .

[26]  Milos Novak,et al.  Nonlinear lateral interaction in pile dynamics , 1995 .

[27]  Suhol Bu,et al.  COUPLED HORIZONTAL-ROCKING IMPEDANCE FUNCTIONS FOR EMBEDDED SQUARE FOUNDATIONS AT HIGH FREQUENCY FACTORS , 1999 .

[28]  J. Jonkman,et al.  Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development , 2009 .

[29]  Mehrdad Kimiaei,et al.  Cyclic lateral response of pile foundations in offshore platforms , 2012 .

[30]  Varvara Zania,et al.  Natural vibration frequency and damping of slender structures founded on monopiles , 2014 .

[31]  D. Rixen,et al.  General Framework for Dynamic Substructuring: History, Review and Classification of Techniques , 2008 .

[32]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen.  Wave propagation in infinite structures and media , 2002 .

[33]  Milos Novak,et al.  Soil-pile interaction in horizontal vibration , 1977 .

[34]  L. A. Padrón,et al.  Effects of soil–structure interaction on the dynamic properties and seismic response of piled structures , 2013 .

[35]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Computationally efficient modelling of dynamic soil–structure interaction of offshore wind turbines on gravity footings , 2014 .

[36]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Nonlinear Programming , 1997 .