Landslide-susceptibility analysis using light detection and ranging-derived digital elevation models and logistic regression models: a case study in Mizunami City, Japan

Abstract To mitigate the damage caused by landslide disasters, different mathematical models have been applied to predict landslide spatial distribution characteristics. Although some researchers have achieved excellent results around the world, few studies take the spatial resolution of the database into account. Four types of digital elevation model (DEM) ranging from 2 to 20 m derived from light detection and ranging technology to analyze landslide susceptibility in Mizunami City, Gifu Prefecture, Japan, are presented. Fifteen landslide-causative factors are considered using a logistic-regression approach to create models for landslide potential analysis. Pre-existing landslide bodies are used to evaluate the performance of the four models. The results revealed that the 20-m model had the highest classification accuracy (71.9%), whereas the 2-m model had the lowest value (68.7%). In the 2-m model, 89.4% of the landslide bodies fit in the medium to very high categories. For the 20-m model, only 83.3% of the landslide bodies were concentrated in the medium to very high classes. When the cell size decreases from 20 to 2 m, the area under the relative operative characteristic increases from 0.68 to 0.77. Therefore, higher-resolution DEMs would provide better results for landslide-susceptibility mapping.

[1]  Manfred F. Buchroithner,et al.  Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Neuro-Fuzzy Approach in a Landslide-Prone Area (Cameron Highlands, Malaysia) , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  H. Saito,et al.  Comparison of landslide susceptibility based on a decision-tree model and actual landslide occurrence: The Akaishi Mountains, Japan , 2009 .

[3]  Abbas Alimohammadi,et al.  A GIS-based neuro-fuzzy procedure for integrating knowledge and data in landslide susceptibility mapping , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[4]  H. A. Nefeslioglu,et al.  Extraction of potential debris source areas by logistic regression technique: a case study from Barla, Besparmak and Kapi mountains (NW Taurids, Turkey) , 2008 .

[5]  L. Tham,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping based on Support Vector Machine: A case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China , 2008 .

[6]  E. Yesilnacar,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping : A comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek Region (Turkey) , 2005 .

[7]  Jon Finch,et al.  Can soil moisture be mapped onto the terrain , 2004 .

[8]  Saro Lee Application and verification of fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide susceptibility mapping , 2007 .

[9]  Manjeet Singh,et al.  Design and development of instrumentation network for landslide monitoring and issue an early warning , 2008 .

[10]  V. Doyuran,et al.  Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment, Turkey , 2004 .

[11]  Young-Kwang Yeon,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping in Injae, Korea, using a decision tree , 2010 .

[12]  Netra R. Regmi,et al.  Assessing susceptibility to landslides: Using models to understand observed changes in slopes , 2010 .

[13]  I. Yilmaz Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine , 2010 .

[14]  Biswajeet Pradhan,et al.  Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  Chein-Lee Wang,et al.  A back-propagation network for the assessment of susceptibility to rock slope failure in the eastern portion of the Southern Cross-Island Highway in Taiwan , 2009 .

[16]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[17]  Saro Lee Comparison of landslide susceptibility maps generated through multiple logistic regression for three test areas in Korea , 2007 .

[18]  M. Matteucci,et al.  Artificial neural networks and cluster analysis in landslide susceptibility zonation , 2008 .

[19]  Maria Petrou,et al.  Landslide Possibility Mapping Using Fuzzy Approaches , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[20]  A. Stein,et al.  Landslide susceptibility assessment using logistic regression and its comparison with a rock mass classification system, along a road section in the northern Himalayas (India) , 2010 .

[21]  I. Moore,et al.  Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications , 1991 .

[22]  C. Gokceoğlu,et al.  Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach , 2002 .

[23]  S. Bai,et al.  GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping of the Zhongxian segment in the Three Gorges area, China , 2010 .

[24]  Chandra Prakash Poudyal,et al.  Landslide susceptibility maps comparing frequency ratio and artificial neural networks: a case study from the Nepal Himalaya , 2010 .

[25]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models , 2010 .

[26]  Netra R. Regmi,et al.  Modeling susceptibility to landslides using the weight of evidence approach: Western Colorado, USA , 2010 .

[27]  Manoj K. Arora,et al.  Landslide risk assessment using concepts of danger pixels and fuzzy set theory in Darjeeling Himalayas , 2008 .

[28]  A. Shakoor,et al.  A GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses , 2010 .