Agricultural drainage tile surveying using an unmanned aircraft vehicle paired with Real-Time Kinematic positioning - A case study

Abstract A 2012 agricultural census reported approximately 218,000 U.S. farms to have subsurface tile networks that artificially drain over 19.7 million hectares. These drainage networks present a significant expense to landowners during their installation, inspection, maintenance, and upgrading. The conventional methods for locating buried drain tiles are by excavation employing heavy machinery and hand tile probes which are expensive and time-consuming. Aerial photography offers promise as a less-expensive alternative for mapping tile networks over vast acreages. In aerial photography, ground-surface discolorations from the concentratio of draining moisture periodically appear directly atop functioning drains. We have noted drainage surface patterns occurring on Midwestern fields with minimal surface residue one to three days following significant rainfall. An unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) equipped with visible or thermal infrared (TIR) imaging can detect these distortions at appropriate times. Our study compared Real Time Kinematic (RTK) and Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Global Positioning System (GPS) for mapping of subsurface drain tiles. The case study revealed WAAS GPS provided insufficient accuracy and precision for physically locating the buried tiles. Although more expensive and complicated, satellite RTK technology increases the vertical and horizontal alignment of UAV surveys as it projects aerial imagery precisely and accurately onto a geodetic coordinate system. The pairing of RTK technology with the UAV survey was deemed essential for physically locating buried tile lines in the field.

[1]  S. J. Thomson,et al.  CONTINUOUS GEOREFERENCING FOR VIDEO–BASED REMOTE SENSING ON AGRICULTURAL AIRCRAFT , 2002 .

[2]  G. Sands,et al.  Effects of Agricultural Drainage on Aquatic Ecosystems: A Review , 2009 .

[3]  Steven J. Thomson,et al.  An instrumentation platform and GPS position latency issues for remote sensing on agricultural aircraft , 2007 .

[4]  R P Hooper,et al.  Nitrogen input to the Gulf of Mexico. , 2001, Journal of environmental quality.

[5]  Ross W. Irwin,et al.  EFFECTS OF LAND DRAINAGE ON STREAM FLOW , 1983 .

[6]  Barry J. Allred,et al.  A GPR Agricultural Drainage Pipe Detection Case Study: Effects of Antenna Orientation Relative to Drainage Pipe Directional Trend , 2013 .

[7]  Chi-Chih Chen,et al.  IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS FOR LOCATING BURIED AGRICULTURAL DRAINAGE PIPE USING GROUND PENETRATING RADAR , 2005 .

[8]  Lei Tian,et al.  Method for automatic georeferencing aerial remote sensing (RS) images from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platform , 2011 .

[9]  Chi-Chih Chen,et al.  DETECTION OF BURIED AGRICULTURAL DRAINAGE PIPE WITH GEOPHYSICAL METHODS , 2004 .

[10]  Robert S. Freeland,et al.  Effective and efficient agricultural drainage pipe mapping with UAS thermal infrared imagery: A case study , 2018 .

[11]  Laura C. Bowling,et al.  Detecting subsurface drainage systems and estimating drain spacing in intensively managed agricultural landscapes. , 2009 .

[12]  W. Mitsch,et al.  Reducing Nitrogen Loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin: Strategies to Counter a Persistent Ecological Problem , 2001 .

[13]  T. L. Chow,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF SUBSURFACE DRAIN LOCATIONS WITH GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR , 1989 .

[14]  Barry J. Allred,et al.  Location of Agricultural Drainage Pipes and Assessment of Agricultural Drainage Pipe Conditions Using Ground Penetrating Radar , 2010 .