Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position

In an earlier paper (Maljkovic & Nakayama, 1994) we showed that repetition of an attention-driving feature primes the deployment of attention to the same feature on subsequent trials. Here we show that repetition of the targetposition also primes subsequent trials. Position priming shows a characteristic spatial pattern. Facilitation occurs when the target position is repeated on subsequent trials, and inhibition occurs when the target falls on a position previously occupied by a distractor. Facilitation and inhibition also exist, though somewhat diminished, for positions adjacent to those of the target and distractors. Assessing the effect of a single trial over time, we show that the characteristic memory trace exerts its strongest influence on immediately following trials and decays gradually over the succeeding, approximately five to eight, trials. Throughout this period, target-position facilitation is always stronger than distractor-position inhibition. The characteristics of position priming are also seen under conditions in which the attention-driving feature either stays the same or differs from the previous trial, suggesting that feature and position priming operate independently. In a separate experiment, using the fact that position priming is cumulative over trials, we show that position priming is largely object- or landmark-centered.

[1]  C. R. Snyder Selection, inspection, and naming in visual search. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control—IV. Anticipatory smooth eye movements depend on prior target motions , 1984, Vision Research.

[3]  E. Maylor,et al.  Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  R. Menzel Memory Traces in Honeybees , 1987 .

[5]  Robert Hockey,et al.  Effects of repetition on the facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  R. Andersen,et al.  The role of the posterior parietal cortex in coordinate transformations for visual-motor integration. , 1988, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[8]  R. Bajcsy Active perception , 1988, Proc. IEEE.

[9]  J Miller,et al.  Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[11]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Dana H. Ballard,et al.  Behavioural constraints on animate vision , 1989, Image Vis. Comput..

[13]  B. Kröse,et al.  The control and speed of shifts of attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[14]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  S P Tipper,et al.  Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identification and localization tasks: time course and disruption. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.

[17]  R. Desimone,et al.  A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex. , 1991, Science.

[18]  S. Tipper,et al.  Short Report: Object-Centred Inhibition of Return of Visual Attention , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  A. Treisman,et al.  Automaticity and preattentive processing. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[20]  M. Bravo,et al.  The role of attention in different visual-search tasks , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Ee Sutter,et al.  A deterministic approach to nonlinear systems analysis , 1992 .

[22]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  Detection of cryptic prey: search image or search rate? , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[23]  H Egeth,et al.  Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  D. Schacter,et al.  Implicit memory: a selective review. , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  K. Shapiro,et al.  The locus of inhibition in the priming of static objects: object token versus location. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[27]  L. Valdes,et al.  Negative priming without probe selection , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Negative priming for spatial locations: identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition , 1994 .