Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism

Epistatic interactions, manifested in the effects of mutations on the phenotypes caused by other mutations, may help uncover the functional organization of complex biological networks. Here, we studied system-level epistatic interactions by computing growth phenotypes of all single and double knockouts of 890 metabolic genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, using the framework of flux balance analysis. A new scale for epistasis identified a distinctive trimodal distribution of these epistatic effects, allowing gene pairs to be classified as buffering, aggravating or noninteracting. We found that the ensuing epistatic interaction network could be organized hierarchically into function-enriched modules that interact with each other 'monochromatically' (i.e., with purely aggravating or purely buffering epistatic links). This property extends the concept of epistasis from single genes to functional units and provides a new definition of biological modularity, which emphasizes interactions between, rather than within, functional modules. Our approach can be used to infer functional gene modules from purely phenotypic epistasis measurements.

[1]  S. Salthe.  Evolving Hierarchical Systems: Their Structure and Representation , 1985 .

[2]  M. Conrad.  Evolving hierarchical systems: Stanley N. Salthe, Columbia University Press, New York, 1985, 343pp. (US$32.50) , 1987 .

[3]  D. Hartl,et al.  Metabolic flux and fitness. , 1987, Genetics.

[4]  A. Kondrashov.  Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction , 1988, Nature.

[5]  Nature Genetics , 1991, Nature.

[6]  R. Lenski,et al.  Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria , 1997, Nature.

[7]  Santiago F. Elena,et al.  Little Evidence for Synergism Among Deleterious Mutations in a Nonsegmented RNA Virus , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[8]  J. Hopfield,et al.  From molecular to modular cell biology , 1999, Nature.

[9]  C. Ofria,et al.  Genome complexity, robustness and genetic interactions in digital organisms , 1999, Nature.

[10]  M. Wade,et al.  Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process , 2000 .

[11]  R. Korona,et al.  Epistatic interactions of spontaneous mutations in haploid strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2001 .

[12]  B. Garvik,et al.  Principles for the buffering of genetic variation. , 2001 .

[13]  Lingchong You,et al.  Dependence of epistasis on environment and mutation severity as revealed by in silico mutagenesis of phage t7. , 2002, Genetics.

[14]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[15]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Modularity in Metabolic Networks , 2002, Science.

[16]  G. Church,et al.  Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks , 2002 .

[17]  Kenneth J. Kauffman,et al.  Advances in flux balance analysis. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[18]  S. Leibler,et al.  Environmental stresses can alleviate the average deleterious effect of mutations , 2003, Journal of biology.

[19]  C. Burch,et al.  Patterns of epistasis in RNA viruses: a review of the evidence from vaccine design , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[20]  B. Palsson,et al.  Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. , 2003, Genome research.

[21]  D. Pe’er,et al.  Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[22]  B. Palsson,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae phenotypes can be predicted by using constraint-based analysis of a genome-scale reconstructed metabolic network , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  T. Mackay,et al.  The genetic architecture of odor-guided behavior in Drosophila: epistasis and the transcriptome , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Metabolic network analysis of the causes and evolution of enzyme dispensability in yeast , 2004 .

[25]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Global organization of metabolic fluxes in the bacterium Escherichia coli , 2004, Nature.

[26]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Global Mapping of the Yeast Genetic Interaction Network , 2004, Science.

[27]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  Minimal cut sets in biochemical reaction networks , 2004, Bioinform..

[28]  R. Lenski,et al.  Pervasive joint influence of epistasis and plasticity on mutational effects in Escherichia coli , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[29]  Jan Ihmels,et al.  Principles of transcriptional control in the metabolic network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  Eytan Ruppin,et al.  Multi-knockout genetic network analysis: the Rad6 example , 2004 .

[31]  Stephen S Fong,et al.  Metabolic gene–deletion strains of Escherichia coli evolve to computationally predicted growth phenotypes , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[32]  Bernhard O Palsson,et al.  Hierarchical thinking in network biology: the unbiased modularization of biochemical networks. , 2004, Trends in biochemical sciences.