Automated detection of analyzable metaphase chromosome cells depicted on scanned digital microscopic images

Visually searching for analyzable metaphase chromosome cells under microscopes is quite time-consuming and difficult. To improve detection efficiency, consistency, and diagnostic accuracy, an automated microscopic image scanning system was developed and tested to directly acquire digital images with sufficient spatial resolution for clinical diagnosis. A computer-aided detection (CAD) scheme was also developed and integrated into the image scanning system to search for and detect the regions of interest (ROI) that contain analyzable metaphase chromosome cells in the large volume of scanned images acquired from one specimen. Thus, the cytogeneticists only need to observe and interpret the limited number of ROIs. In this study, the high-resolution microscopic image scanning and CAD performance was investigated and evaluated using nine sets of images scanned from either bone marrow (three) or blood (six) specimens for diagnosis of leukemia. The automated CAD-selection results were compared with the visual selection. In the experiment, the cytogeneticists first visually searched for the analyzable metaphase chromosome cells from specimens under microscopes. The specimens were also automated scanned and followed by applying the CAD scheme to detect and save ROIs containing analyzable cells while deleting the others. The automated selected ROIs were then examined by a panel of three cytogeneticists. From the scanned images, CAD selected more analyzable cells than initially visual examinations of the cytogeneticists in both blood and bone marrow specimens. In general, CAD had higher performance in analyzing blood specimens. Even in three bone marrow specimens, CAD selected 50, 22, 9 ROIs, respectively. Except matching with the initially visual selection of 9, 7, and 5 analyzable cells in these three specimens, the cytogeneticists also selected 41, 15 and 4 new analyzable cells, which were missed in initially visual searching. This experiment showed the feasibility of applying this CAD-guided high-resolution microscopic image scanning system to prescreen and select ROIs that may contain analyzable metaphase chromosome cells. The success and the further improvement of this automated scanning system may have great impact on the future clinical practice in genetic laboratories to detect and diagnose diseases.

[1]  J. Márquez,et al.  Roughness feature of metaphase chromosome spreads and nuclei for automated cell proliferation analysis , 1998, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[2]  Shibo Li,et al.  Development and assessment of an integrated computer-aided detection scheme for digital microscopic images of metaphase chromosomes , 2008, J. Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Wei R. Chen,et al.  Automated identification of analyzable metaphase chromosomes depicted on microscopic digital images , 2008, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[4]  G. Corkidi,et al.  Automatic identification of metaphase spreads and nuclei using neural networks , 2001, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[5]  Jim Piper,et al.  Automation of chromosome analysis , 1980 .

[6]  K R Castleman.  The PSI automatic metaphase finder. , 1992, Journal of radiation research.

[7]  Xiaogang Ruan.  A classifier with the fuzzy Hopfield network for human chromosomes , 2000, Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (Cat. No.00EX393).

[8]  Tian-Li Wang,et al.  Apply innovative technologies to explore cancer genome , 2005, Current opinion in oncology.

[9]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Development and evaluation of automated systems for detection and classification of banded chromosomes: current status and future perspectives , 2005 .

[10]  Thierry Soussi,et al.  Quantitative fish determination of chromosome 3 arm imbalances in lung tumors by automated image cytometry. , 2004, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[11]  A. Oosterlinck,et al.  Chromosome Classification Using A Multi-layer Perceptron Neural Net , 1990, [1990] Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Using contrast transfer function to evaluate the effect of motion blur on microscope image quality , 2008, SPIE BiOS.

[13]  Shibo Li,et al.  Automated classification of metaphase chromosomes: Optimization of an adaptive computerized scheme , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[14]  Its'hak Dinstein,et al.  Feature extraction by neural network nonlinear mapping for pattern classification , 1996, Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[15]  Peter Kovesi,et al.  Surface Detection in 3D Confocal Microscope Images via Local Energy and Ridge Tracing , 1996 .

[16]  J. Rowley,et al.  Recurring chromosome abnormalities in leukemia and lymphoma. , 1990, Seminars in hematology.

[17]  D. Harnden,et al.  An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature (1985) : ISCN (1985) : report of the Standing Committee on Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature , 1985 .

[18]  Bin Zheng,et al.  A Computer-Aided Method to Expedite the Evaluation of Prognosis for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2006, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[19]  B H Mayall,et al.  The Athena semi-automated karyotyping system. , 1990, Cytometry.

[20]  P. Mousavi,et al.  Feature analysis and classification of chromosome 16 homologs using fluorescence microscopy images , 1999, Engineering Solutions for the Next Millennium. 1999 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (Cat. No.99TH8411).

[21]  T. Lörch,et al.  Automated fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of t(9;22)(q34;q11) in interphase nuclei , 2006, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[22]  S. Delshadpour.  Reduced size multi layer perceptron neural network for human chromosome classification , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[23]  N. Sweeney,et al.  A comparison of wavelet and Fourier descriptors for a neural network chromosome classifier , 1997, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 'Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering' (Cat. No.97CH36136).

[24]  Thomas Liehr,et al.  Rapid detection of subtelomeric deletion/duplication by novel real‐time quantitative PCR using SYBR‐green dye , 2004, Human mutation.