Model-based experimental data evaluation of separation efficiency of multistage coarse particle classification in a zigzag apparatus

In most industrial processes dealing with particles, separation of fine (or light) and coarse (or heavy) particles in a fluid flow is an essential part to obtain the required product quality. These separation processes are typically designed based on the particles' terminal settling velocity as the dominant property. In this work, sand and gravel have been selected as suitable model grains representing mineral and agricultural raw materials and products. The terminal settling velocity depends on stochastically distributed physical and granulometric particle properties like size, density, and shape. Separation experiments in a pilot-scale zigzag separator have been performed using different channel velocities and solid mass loadings in order to improve the understanding of the separation process in this complex turbulent flow. Then, classification has been modeled as a multistage cross-flow separation process in a turbulent air flow. Performance has been analyzed and discussed with respect to separation functions and characteristic parameters like cut size, separation sharpness, separation stage utilization, and product quality, quantified by cumulative product purities of over- and underflow as well as specific energy consumption. Finally, a SMART analysis has been used to identify optimal process parameters. The obtained cut sizes differ significantly from those found in literature. Thus, a more detailed analysis accounting for aerodynamics and turbulence is developed to show the significant influence of channel geometry on separation efficiency.

[1]  Byung-Su Kim,et al.  Novel physical separation process for eco-friendly recycling of rare and valuable metals from end-of-life DVD-PCBs , 2013 .

[2]  Alain H. Cartellier,et al.  Analyzing preferential concentration and clustering of inertial particles in turbulence , 2012 .

[3]  Christoph Roloff,et al.  Simulation of Multi‐Stage Particle Classification in a Zigzag Apparatus , 2014 .

[4]  Jürgen Tomas Gravity Separation of Particulate Solids in Turbulent Fluid Flow , 2004 .

[5]  Peter Müller,et al.  Beschleunigter Sinkprozess fester Partikel bei laminarer und turbulenter Umströmung , 2015 .

[6]  Anja Maul,et al.  The effect of mechanical–physical pretreatment on hydrometallurgical extraction of copper and tin in residue from printed circuit boards from used consumer equipment , 2014 .

[7]  Fritz Kaiser Der Zickzack‐Sichter ‐ ein Windsichter nach neuem Prinzip , 1963 .

[8]  O. Levenspiel,et al.  Drag coefficient and terminal velocity of spherical and nonspherical particles , 1989 .

[9]  T. Gröger,et al.  Mehrstufige turbulente Aerosortierung von Bauschutt , 1999 .

[10]  J. F. Richardson,et al.  The sedimentation of a suspension of uniform spheres under conditions of viscous flow , 1954 .

[11]  Johannes M. Nitsche,et al.  Break-up of a falling drop containing dispersed particles , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  David L. Olson,et al.  Decision Aids for Selection Problems , 1995 .

[13]  P. F. Valuiskii,et al.  Testing of the zigzag classifier for granulated materials , 1975 .

[14]  D. Espig,et al.  Klassieren in turbulenten Zwei-Phasen-Strömungen , 1986 .

[15]  Michael W. Biddulph,et al.  A method of comparing the performance of air classifiers , 1989 .

[16]  Udo Fritsching,et al.  Zur mehrphasigen Strömung in einem Zick-Zack-Sichter , 1996 .

[17]  Jinki Jeong,et al.  Enrichment of the metallic components from waste printed circuit boards by a mechanical separation process using a stamp mill. , 2009, Waste management.

[18]  H F Wang,et al.  AIRFLOW FIELDS SIMULATION ON PASSIVE PULSING AIR CLASSIFIERS , 2005 .

[19]  P. Aarne Vesilind,et al.  Testing and evaluation of air classifier performance , 1979 .

[20]  P. Aarne Vesilind,et al.  Effect of feed rate on air classifier performance , 1981 .

[21]  Mmg Thijs Senden Stochastic models for individual particle behavior in straight and zig zag classifiers , 1979 .