An Evaluation of Level of Detail Degradation in Head-Mounted Display Peripheries

A paradigm for the design of systems that manage level of detail in virtual environments is proposed. As an example of the prototyping step in this paradigm, a user study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of high-detail insets used with head-mounted displays. Ten subjects were given a simple search task that required the location and identification of a single target object. All subjects used seven different displays (the independent variable), varying in inset size and peripheral detail, to perform this task Frame rate, target location, subject input method, and order of display use were all controlled. Primary dependent measures were search time on trials with correct identification, and the percentage of all trials correctly identified. ANOVAs of the results showed that insetless, high-detail displays did not lead to significantly different search times or accuracies than displays with insets. In fact, only the insetless, low-detail display returned significantly different results. Further research is being performed to examine the effect of varying task complexity, inset size, and level of detail.

[1]  Henry Fuchs,et al.  Research directions in virtual environments: report of an NSF Invitational Workshop, March 23-24, 1992, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , 1992, COMG.

[2]  Mel Slater,et al.  Simulating peripheral vision in immersive virtual environments , 1993, Comput. Graph..

[3]  Peter Shirley,et al.  Visual navigation of large environments using textured clusters , 1995, I3D '95.

[4]  Warren Robinett,et al.  Implementing virtual reality , 1994, CHI '94.

[5]  A. van Dam,et al.  VR as a forcing function: Software implications of a new paradigm , 1993 .

[6]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  The Mental Rotation and Perceived Realism of Computer-Generated Three-Dimensional Images , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[7]  John H. Reif,et al.  Design and applications of a high-resolution insert head-mounted-display , 1995, Proceedings Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '95.

[8]  Warren Robinett,et al.  A Computational Model for the Stereoscopic Optics of a Head-Mounted Display , 1991, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[9]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  A Method of Computational Correction for Optical Distortioin in Head-Mounted Displays , 1993 .

[10]  E. Mingolla,et al.  Perception of surface curvature and direction of illumination from patterns of shading. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  A. B. Nutt.  Binocular vision. , 1945, The British orthoptic journal.

[12]  David Zeltzer,et al.  Autonomy, Interaction, and Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[13]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  Michael Garland,et al.  Multiresolution Modeling for Fast Rendering , 1999 .

[15]  Carrie Heeter,et al.  Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[16]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Greg Turk,et al.  Re-tiling polygonal surfaces , 1992, SIGGRAPH.

[18]  N. Graham.  Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[19]  R AthertonPeter,et al.  A subjective judgment study of polygon based curved surface imagery , 1985 .

[20]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Visual Perception: The Neurophysiological Foundations , 1989 .

[21]  Kees C. J. Overbeeke,et al.  Visual resolution and spatial performance: the trade-off between resolution and interactivity , 1995, Proceedings Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '95.

[22]  Carlo H. Séquin,et al.  Adaptive display algorithm for interactive frame rates during visualization of complex virtual environments , 1993, SIGGRAPH.

[23]  Mel Slater,et al.  Representations Systems, Perceptual Position, and Presence in Immersive Virtual Environments , 1993, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[24]  Jarek Rossignac,et al.  Multi-resolution 3D approximations for rendering complex scenes , 1993, Modeling in Computer Graphics.

[25]  Kellogg S. Booth,et al.  On the parameters of human visual performance: an investigation of the benefits of antialiasing , 1987, CHI 1987.

[26]  R. Nelson,et al.  Visual Navigation , 1996 .

[27]  Benjamin Watson,et al.  Managing Level of Detail in Virtual Environments: A Perceptual Framework , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[28]  Eric M. Howlett,et al.  High-resolution inserts in wide-angle head-mounted stereoscopic displays , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[29]  Peter R. Atherton,et al.  A subjective judgment study of polygon based curved surface imagery , 1985, CHI '85.