Lessons, narratives, and research directions for a sustainable circular economy

The current enthusiasm for the circular economy (CE) offers a unique opportunity to advance the impact of research on sustainability transitions. Diverse interpretations of CE by scholars, however, produce partly opposing assessments of its potential benefits, which can hinder progress. Here, we synthesize policy‐relevant lessons and research directions for a sustainable CE and identify three narratives—optimist, reformist, and skeptical—that underpin the ambiguity in CE assessments. Based on 54 key CE scholars’ insights, we identify three research needs: the articulation and discussion of ontologically distinct CE narratives; bridging of technical, managerial, socio‐economic, environmental, and political CE perspectives; and critical assessment of opportunities and limits of CE science–policy interactions. Our findings offer practical guidance for scholars to engage reflexively with the rapid expansion of CE knowledge, identify and pursue high‐impact research directions, and communicate more effectively with practitioners and policymakers.

[1]  Sina Leipold,et al.  Discursive dynamics and lock-ins in socio-technical systems: an overview and a way forward , 2022, Sustainability Science.

[2]  Sina Leipold,et al.  Why common interests and collective action are not enough for environmental cooperation – Lessons from the China-EU cooperation discourse on circular economy , 2021, Global Environmental Change.

[3]  Callie W. Babbitt,et al.  Thematic exploration of sectoral and cross-cutting challenges to circular economy implementation , 2021, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[4]  Sina Leipold.  Transforming ecological modernization ‘from within’ or perpetuating it? The circular economy as EU environmental policy narrative , 2021 .

[5]  Robert H. W. Boyer,et al.  Product Labels for the Circular Economy: Are Customers Willing to Pay for Circular? , 2020, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[6]  C. Lauk,et al.  Spaceship earth's odyssey to a circular economy - a century long perspective , 2020 .

[7]  W. Vermeulen.  Transdisciplinarity For Sustainability , 2020 .

[8]  C. Bening,et al.  Why “Circular” doesn't always mean “Sustainable” , 2020 .

[9]  M. Laubichler,et al.  A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[10]  Roberta Salomone,et al.  A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm , 2020 .

[11]  K. Sund,et al.  A modified Delphi method to elicit and compare perceptions of industry trends , 2020, MethodsX.

[12]  K. Hobson.  The limits of the loops: critical environmental politics and the Circular Economy , 2020, Environmental Politics.

[13]  N. Saccani,et al.  Circular Economy in the WEEE industry: a systematic literature review and a research agenda , 2020 .

[14]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  From elite folk science to the policy legend of the circular economy , 2020 .

[15]  J. Wills,et al.  Setting the agenda for social science research on the human microbiome , 2020, Palgrave Communications.

[16]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[17]  R. Geyer,et al.  Circular Economy Rebound , 2017 .

[18]  Michael P. Schlaile,et al.  Transitions to Sustainable Development , 2019, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

[19]  D. Magda,et al.  A tool for reflecting on research stances to support sustainability transitions , 2019, Nature Sustainability.

[20]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Towards sustainable development through the circular economy—A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics , 2019, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[21]  Susse Georg,et al.  Exploring circular economy imaginaries in European cities: A research agenda for the governance of urban sustainability transitions , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[22]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  How to monitor environmental pressures of a circular economy: An assessment of indicators , 2019, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[23]  T. McAloone,et al.  Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[24]  Tobias Börger,et al.  The Circular Economy: Swings and Roundabouts? , 2019, Ecological Economics.

[25]  Florian Lüdeke-Freund,et al.  A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns , 2019 .

[26]  P. Schroeder,et al.  The Relevance of Circular Economy Practices to the Sustainable Development Goals , 2019 .

[27]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  A taxonomy of circular economy indicators , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[28]  T. Domenech,et al.  Transition Towards a Resource Efficient Circular Economy in Europe: Policy Lessons From the EU and the Member States , 2017, Ecological Economics.

[29]  Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour,et al.  Unlocking the circular economy through new business models based on large-scale data: An integrative framework and research agenda , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[30]  A. Petit‐Boix,et al.  The circular economy and the bio-based sector - Perspectives of European and German stakeholders , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[31]  Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour,et al.  Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: a proposed research agenda and original roadmap for sustainable operations , 2018, Annals of Operations Research.

[32]  C. Boks,et al.  Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review , 2018, Sustainability.

[33]  C. Boks,et al.  Dimensions of Behaviour Change in the context of Designing for a Circular Economy , 2018, The Design Journal.

[34]  C. Boks,et al.  Marketing Approaches for a Circular Economy: Using Design Frameworks to Interpret Online Communications , 2018, Sustainability.

[35]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[36]  J. Korhonen,et al.  Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations , 2018 .

[37]  Keith R. Skene,et al.  Circles, spirals, pyramids and cubes: why the circular economy cannot work , 2018, Sustainability Science.

[38]  R. Merli,et al.  How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review , 2017 .

[39]  M. Ormazábal,et al.  Towards a consensus on the circular economy , 2017 .

[40]  Leonidas Milios,et al.  Advancing to a Circular Economy: three essential ingredients for a comprehensive policy mix , 2017, Sustainability Science.

[41]  D. Lazarevic,et al.  Narrating expectations for the circular economy: Towards a common and contested European transition , 2017 .

[42]  R. Kemp,et al.  Circular Economy Policies in China and Europe , 2017 .

[43]  F. Blomsma,et al.  The Emergence of Circular Economy: A New Framing Around Prolonging Resource Productivity , 2017 .

[44]  Kate Raworth.  A Doughnut for the Anthropocene: humanity's compass in the 21st century. , 2017, The Lancet. Planetary health.

[45]  K. Winans,et al.  The history and current applications of the circular economy concept , 2017 .

[46]  E. Hultink,et al.  The Circular Economy - A New Sustainability Paradigm? , 2017 .

[47]  Nicholas Lynch,et al.  Diversifying and de-growing the circular economy: Radical social transformation in a resource-scarce world , 2016 .

[48]  Paul Cairney,et al.  To Bridge the Divide between Evidence and Policy: Reduce Ambiguity as Much as Uncertainty , 2016 .

[49]  A. Rashid,et al.  Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry , 2016 .

[50]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems , 2016 .

[51]  Henning Friege,et al.  Circular economy: European policy on shaky ground , 2016, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[52]  P. Deutz,et al.  Introducing an international perspective on industrial ecology , 2015 .

[53]  M. Crang,et al.  Interrogating the circular economy: the moral economy of resource recovery in the EU , 2015 .

[54]  P. Deutz,et al.  International Perspectives on Industrial Ecology , 2015 .

[55]  Daniel Sousa,et al.  Validation in Qualitative Research: General Aspects and Specificities of the Descriptive Phenomenological Method , 2014 .

[56]  A. Heshmati,et al.  A review of the circular economy in China : Moving from rhetoric to implementation , 2013 .

[57]  R. Keller.  Doing Discourse Research: An Introduction for Social Scientists , 2012 .

[58]  Chettiyappan Visvanathan,et al.  Resources, Conservation and Recycling , 2011 .

[59]  J. Grin,et al.  Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change , 2010 .

[60]  S. Seuring,et al.  Core issues in sustainable supply chain management – a Delphi study , 2008 .

[61]  David W. Macdonald,et al.  The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK , 2006 .

[62]  D. Yanow,et al.  Interpretation and Method : Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn , 2006 .

[63]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[64]  Christian Kleinewächter,et al.  On identification , 2005, Electron. Notes Discret. Math..

[65]  T. D. Bolger,et al.  The Principles of Knowledge. , 1902 .