Pattern Recognition Reveals Characteristic Postprandial Glucose Changes: Non-Individualized Meal Detection in Diabetes Mellitus Type 1

Accurate continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is essential for fully automated glucose control in diabetes mellitus type 1. State-of-the-art glucose control systems automatically regulate the basal insulin infusion. Users still need to manually announce meals to dose the prandial insulin boluses. An automated meal detection could release the user and improve the glucose regulation. In this study, patterns in the postprandial CGM data are exploited for meal detection. Binary classifiers are trained to recognize the postprandial pattern in horizons of the estimated glucose rate of appearance and in CGM data. The appearance rate is determined by moving horizon estimation based on a simple model. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is used for classification. The proposed method is compared to methods that detect meals when thresholds are violated. Diabetes care data from 12 free-living pediatric patients was downloaded during regular screening. Experts identified meals and their start by retrospective evaluation. The classification was tested by cross-validation. Compared to the threshold-based methods, LDA showed higher sensitivity to meals with a low rate of false alarms. Classifying horizons outperformed the other methods also with respect to time of detection. The onset of meals can be detected by pattern recognition based on estimated model states and consecutive CGM measurements. No individual tuning is necessary. This makes the method easily adopted in the clinical practice.

[1]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Minimal model estimation of glucose absorption and insulin sensitivity from oral test: validation with a tracer method. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[2]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas Systems: Physiological Input to Enhance Next-Generation Devices , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[3]  Niels Kjølstad Poulsen,et al.  Fault and meal detection by redundant continuous glucose monitors and the unscented Kalman filter , 2017, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[4]  Hyunjin Lee,et al.  A closed-loop artificial pancreas based on model predictive control: Human-friendly identification and automatic meal disturbance rejection , 2009, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[5]  Ali Cinar,et al.  Automatic Detection and Estimation of Unannounced Meals for Multivariable Artificial Pancreas System. , 2018, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[6]  Ali Cinar,et al.  Meal Detection and Carbohydrate Estimation Using Continuous Glucose Sensor Data , 2017, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[7]  Josep Vehí,et al.  Unannounced Meals in the Artificial Pancreas: Detection Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring , 2018, Sensors.

[8]  Daniela M. Witten,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R , 2013 .

[9]  Ali Cinar,et al.  Real-time insulin bolusing for unannounced meals with artificial pancreas , 2017 .

[10]  Øyvind Stavdahl,et al.  Kalman Smoothing for Objective and Automatic Preprocessing of Glucose Data , 2019, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[11]  F. Doyle,et al.  Design of the Glucose Rate Increase Detector , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[12]  R. Hovorka,et al.  Nonlinear model predictive control of glucose concentration in subjects with type 1 diabetes. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[13]  C. Ramkissoon,et al.  Meal Detection in the Artificial Pancreas: Implications During Exercise , 2017 .

[14]  Joel Andersson,et al.  A General-Purpose Software Framework for Dynamic Optimization (Een algemene softwareomgeving voor dynamische optimalisatie) , 2013 .

[15]  Francesca Annan,et al.  Exercise management in type 1 diabetes: a consensus statement. , 2017, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[16]  A. Fougner,et al.  Impact of sensing and infusion site dependent dynamics on insulin bolus based meal compensation , 2017 .

[17]  James B. Rawlings,et al.  Efficient moving horizon estimation and nonlinear model predictive control , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[18]  R. Bergman,et al.  Physiologic evaluation of factors controlling glucose tolerance in man: measurement of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell glucose sensitivity from the response to intravenous glucose. , 1981, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[19]  Ali Cinar,et al.  Monitoring and fault detection of continuous glucose sensor measurements , 2015, 2015 American Control Conference (ACC).

[20]  T. Pieber,et al.  A Pooled Analysis of Clinical Pharmacology Trials Investigating the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Characteristics of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes , 2017, Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

[21]  Øyvind Stavdahl,et al.  Meal detection based on non-individualized moving horizon estimation and classification , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA).

[22]  Jay H. Lee,et al.  A moving horizon‐based approach for least‐squares estimation , 1996 .

[23]  A. Fougner,et al.  A Review of the Current Challenges Associated with the Development of an Artificial Pancreas by a Double Subcutaneous Approach , 2017, Diabetes Therapy.

[24]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  The oral glucose minimal model: Estimation of insulin sensitivity from a meal test , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Martin Holder,et al.  “Let the Algorithm Do the Work”: Reduction of Hypoglycemia Using Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy with Predictive Insulin Suspension (SmartGuard) in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes Patients , 2017, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[26]  F. Doyle,et al.  Detection of a Meal Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[27]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming , 2006, Math. Program..

[28]  LazaroCaterina,et al.  Automatic Detection and Estimation of Unannounced Meals for Multivariable Artificial Pancreas System , 2018 .

[29]  Ali Cinar,et al.  Meal Detection in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A New Module for the Multivariable Adaptive Artificial Pancreas Control System , 2016, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.