Specific and Non-Specific Adhesion in Cancer Cells with Various Metastatic Potentials

The majority of cancer deaths are caused by metastasis, not by the parent tumor. During metastasis, cancer cells detach from their neighbors in the tumor, enter the circulation system, and invade other organs. Thus metastasis initiates with the decrease of adhesion between cancer cells and regaining of adhesion to invade new organs during circulation. In this chapter, we first introduce the altered tumor cells’ behavior during malignant transition with the focus on alterations of cell adhesion. Second, we discuss the cell-cell vs. cell-matrix interaction during cancer metastasis in the context of hierarchical changes in cell-properties during metastasis. Finally, we review the current state-of-the-art devices of single-cell adhesion measurement and present our results on non-specific adhesion measurement between cancer cells and a glass micro probe, using a novel micro force sensor. Adhesion measurements are compared for malignant, metastatic cells (HCT-8), malignant, non-metastatic adenocarcinoma cells (Caco-2), and normal monkey kidney MA104 cells. The non-specific adhesion force for HCT-8 is about twice that compared to Caco-2, and insignificant for MA104. We then measured the specific homotypic cell-cell adhesion rates using a Coulter Counter for PC3M (highly metastatic human prostate cancer), PC3 (less metastatic than PC3M), HCT8 and MA104 cell lines. We found, specific cell adhesion rates decrease with increasing metastatic potential. These results suggest, while specific adhesion of malignant cancer cells are often reduced to facilitate their detachment from the parent tumor, the high non-specific adhesion force on them can strategically maximize their adherence and invasion to diverse tissues during metastasis.

[1]  Mina J. Bissell,et al.  Putting tumours in context , 2001, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[2]  Sterling C. Johnson,et al.  Reduced hippocampal activation during episodic encoding in middle-aged individuals at genetic risk of Alzheimer's Disease: a cross-sectional study , 2006, BMC medicine.

[3]  M. Kirk,et al.  Selective migration of neuralized embryonic stem cells to stem cell factor and media conditioned by glioma cell lines , 2005, Cancer Cell International.

[4]  M. Waltham,et al.  Vimentin and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Human Breast Cancer – Observations in vitro and in vivo , 2007, Cells Tissues Organs.

[5]  Yiider Tseng,et al.  Single-molecule analysis of cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[6]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[7]  P. Janmey,et al.  Cell mechanics: integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[8]  B. Fabry,et al.  Breakdown of the Endothelial Barrier Function in Tumor Cell Transmigration , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[9]  Shengyuan Yang,et al.  Micromachined force sensors for the study of cell mechanics , 2005 .

[10]  R. Bonnecaze,et al.  Extracellular matrix stiffness and architecture govern intracellular rheology in cancer. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[11]  H. Augustin,et al.  Induction of inflammatory angiogenesis by monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 , 1999, International journal of cancer.

[12]  J. Pickett-Heaps,et al.  Traction fibre: toward a "tensegral" model of the spindle. , 1997, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[13]  Frank Speleman,et al.  The αE-catenin gene (CTNNA1) acts as an invasion-suppressor gene in human colon cancer cells , 1999, Oncogene.

[14]  D. V. Essen,et al.  A tension-based theory of morphogenesis and compact wiring in the central nervous system , 1997, Nature.

[15]  D. Wirtz,et al.  Loss of α-Catenin Decreases the Strength of Single E-cadherin Bonds between Human Cancer Cells* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[17]  E. Sahai,et al.  PDK1 regulates cancer cell motility by antagonising inhibition of ROCK1 by RhoE , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[18]  I. Macdonald,et al.  Metastasis: Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[19]  D. R. Coman Decreased Mutual Adhesiveness, a Property of Cells from Squamous Cell Carcinomas , 1944 .

[20]  John Condeelis,et al.  Invadopodia and podosomes in tumor invasion. , 2006, European journal of cell biology.

[21]  Carlos Bustamante,et al.  Differential force microscope for long time-scale biophysical measurements. , 2007, The Review of scientific instruments.

[22]  R. Jove,et al.  Drug resistance in multiple myeloma: approaches to circumvention. , 1999, Seminars in oncology.

[23]  Akira Chiba,et al.  Mechanical tension contributes to clustering of neurotransmitter vesicles at presynaptic terminals , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  J. Pollard Tumour-educated macrophages promote tumour progression and metastasis , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[25]  Paolo P. Provenzano,et al.  Collagen reorganization at the tumor-stromal interface facilitates local invasion , 2006, BMC medicine.

[26]  A. Zijlstra,et al.  The membrane-anchored serine protease, TMPRSS2, activates PAR-2 in prostate cancer cells. , 2005, The Biochemical journal.

[27]  Desmond J. Higham,et al.  Geometric De-noising of Protein-Protein Interaction Networks , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[29]  Bethan Psaila,et al.  The metastatic niche: adapting the foreign soil , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[30]  E. Kohn,et al.  Anoikis: Cancer and the homeless cell , 2004, Nature.

[31]  G. Poste,et al.  Stephen Paget, M.D., F.R.C.S., (1855–1926) A retrospective , 1989, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[32]  Sean P. Palecek,et al.  Integrin-ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell-substratum adhesiveness , 1997, Nature.

[33]  S Paget,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF SECONDARY GROWTHS IN CANCER OF THE BREAST. , 1889 .

[34]  S. Oppenheimer Cellular basis of cancer metastasis: A review of fundamentals and new advances. , 2006, Acta histochemica.

[35]  T. Libermann,et al.  A secreted form of ADAM9 promotes carcinoma invasion through tumor-stromal interactions. , 2005, Cancer research.

[36]  R. Weinberg,et al.  The Biology of Cancer , 2006 .

[37]  M. Rijn,et al.  Alloantigen recognition is preceded by nonspecific adhesion of cytotoxic T cells and target cells. , 1986, Science.

[38]  W. Birchmeier,et al.  Cadherin expression in carcinomas: role in the formation of cell junctions and the prevention of invasiveness. , 1994, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[39]  Jeffrey Wyckoff,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression results in increased tumor cell motility in vivo coordinately with enhanced intravasation and metastasis. , 2006, Cancer research.

[40]  Mikala Egeblad,et al.  Matrix Crosslinking Forces Tumor Progression by Enhancing Integrin Signaling , 2009, Cell.

[41]  G. Sauter,et al.  Changes in Cytoskeletal Protein Composition Indicative of an Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Human Micrometastatic and Primary Breast Carcinoma Cells , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[42]  D. Ingber In search of cellular control: Signal transduction in context , 1998, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[43]  H. Lodish Molecular Cell Biology , 1986 .

[44]  Fabiana Bahna,et al.  Cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion: sticking together as a family. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[45]  P. Halban,et al.  Differential expression of E-cadherin at the surface of rat beta-cells as a marker of functional heterogeneity. , 2007, The Journal of endocrinology.

[46]  A. Harris,et al.  Association of macrophage infiltration with angiogenesis and prognosis in invasive breast carcinoma. , 1996, Cancer research.

[47]  Martin J. Yaffe,et al.  Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention , 2001, Current oncology reports.

[48]  D. R. Coman Mechanisms responsible for the origin and distribution of blood-borne tumor metastases: a review. , 1953, Cancer research.

[49]  T. Foster,et al.  Prostate cancer cells show elevated urokinase receptor in a mouse model of metastasis , 2006, Cancer Cell International.

[50]  P. Keely,et al.  Integrins and GTPases in tumour cell growth, motility and invasion. , 1998, Trends in cell biology.

[51]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Contractile forces in tumor cell migration. , 2008, European journal of cell biology.

[52]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[53]  Daniel A. Hammer,et al.  Integrin Clustering Is Driven by Mechanical Resistance from the Glycocalyx and the Substrate , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[54]  John Condeelis,et al.  Macrophages: Obligate Partners for Tumor Cell Migration, Invasion, and Metastasis , 2006, Cell.

[55]  M. Stack,et al.  Multi-step pericellular proteolysis controls the transition from individual to collective cancer cell invasion , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[56]  S. Rafii,et al.  VEGFR1-positive haematopoietic bone marrow progenitors initiate the pre-metastatic niche , 2005, Nature.

[57]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Mechanics, malignancy, and metastasis: The force journey of a tumor cell , 2009, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[58]  Daniel A. Fletcher,et al.  Combined atomic force microscopy and side-view optical imaging for mechanical studies of cells , 2009, Nature Methods.

[59]  Paul Ducheyne,et al.  The effect of non-specific interactions on cellular adhesion using model surfaces. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[60]  Erik Sahai,et al.  Illuminating the metastatic process , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[61]  E. Sahai,et al.  Tumor cell migration in three dimensions. , 2006, Methods in enzymology.

[62]  Shengyuan Yang,et al.  Force response and actin remodeling (agglomeration) in fibroblasts due to lateral indentation. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[63]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[64]  M. Mareel,et al.  Induction of invasion in vivo of α‐catenin‐positive HCT‐8 human colon‐cancer cells , 2000 .

[65]  Nariyoshi Shinomiya,et al.  Proliferation and invasion: plasticity in tumor cells. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  Shengyuan Yang Micromachined Sensors and Their Applications in the Study of Mechanical Response of Single Living Cells , 2007 .

[67]  P. Friedl,et al.  Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[68]  D E Ingber,et al.  Cellular control lies in the balance of forces. , 1998, Current opinion in cell biology.

[69]  Erik Sahai,et al.  Tumor cells caught in the act of invading: their strategy for enhanced cell motility. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[70]  R. Assoian,et al.  Growth control by intracellular tension and extracellular stiffness. , 2008, Trends in cell biology.

[71]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[72]  R. Assoian,et al.  Regulation of growth factor signaling and cell cycle progression by cell adhesion and adhesion-dependent changes in cellular tension. , 2005, Cytokine & growth factor reviews.

[73]  J. Condeelis,et al.  Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in cancer cell migration and invasion. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[74]  H. Goldsmith,et al.  Kinetics of specific and nonspecific adhesion of red blood cells on glass. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[75]  R. Assoian,et al.  Cell adhesion, cellular tension, and cell cycle control. , 2007, Methods in enzymology.

[76]  Erik Sahai,et al.  Mechanisms of cancer cell invasion. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[77]  H. Suemizu,et al.  Liver metastasis models of colon cancer for evaluation of drug efficacy using NOD/Shi-scid IL2Rgammanull (NOG) mice. , 2008, International journal of oncology.

[78]  Specific Molecular Recognition and Nonspecific Contributions to Bacterial Interaction Forces , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[79]  Sean X. Sun,et al.  α-Catenin mediates initial E-cadherin-dependent cell–cell recognition and subsequent bond strengthening , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[80]  I. Stamenkovic,et al.  Metastatic cancer cell. , 2008, Annual review of pathology.

[81]  C Kung,et al.  Two types of mechanosensitive channels in the Escherichia coli cell envelope: solubilization and functional reconstitution. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[82]  J. Segall,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of invadopodium formation , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[83]  Matthew J. Paszek,et al.  The Tension Mounts: Mechanics Meets Morphogenesis and Malignancy , 2004, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[84]  R. Mansel,et al.  Expression of Autocrine Motility Factor (AMF) and Its Receptor, AMFR, in Human Breast Cancer , 2006, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[85]  S. Vilaró,et al.  Vimentin filaments follow the preexisting cytokeratin network during epithelial-mesenchymal transition of cultured neonatal rat hepatocytes. , 1996, Experimental cell research.

[86]  Ning Wang,et al.  Self-Organized Podosomes Are Dynamic Mechanosensors , 2008, Current Biology.